The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), signed into law in 2011, was designed to improve public health by strengthening the food safety system. The law provided authority to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to write and enforce regulations that focus on preventing food safety issues. The law also directs FDA to enforce food safety standards for foods imported from other countries, with the intent that these foods meet the same safety standards as those grown or processed in the U.S. FDA regulated foods that are grown, manufactured, or processed outside the U.S. are therefore covered under several FSMA regulations including the Produce Safety Rule, the Preventive Controls for Human Foods Rule, and the Preventive Controls for Animal Foods Rule. The Foreign Verification Program Rule (FSVP) requires that importers perform certain risk-based activities to verify that food imported into the United States has been produced in a manner that meets applicable U.S. safety standards.
One of the first challenges for food importers is determining if a particular food falls under FSMA or is excluded. There are many foods imported into the U.S. that may be excluded from FSMA coverage because pre-existing regulation are already in place. These include foods regulated under previously enacted FDA regulations for seafood and juice products. Foods that fall under USDA jurisdiction, specifically meat and poultry products, are excluded because USDA has established its own import regulations. There are also exclusions for imported foods that will not be consumed in the U.S., as well as foods imported solely for test purposes. A general rule to remember is that if a food that is not excluded, it will fall under one or more of the FSMA rules.
A key point for importers to understand is that all foods that are brought into the U.S., and then consumed in the US, must meet U.S. food safety standards. This means that fresh fruits and vegetables grown in another country for export to the U.S. must be grown, harvested, packed, and held under the standards established in the Produce Safety Rule. Foods (human or animal) or food ingredients imported into the U.S. for further processing by U.S. manufacturers will fall under the food safety requirements written in the Preventive Controls Rule for Human Foods or the similar rule for animals food. Imported foods that will not be processed by the importer such as those directly sold through retail entities must assume responsibility, in conjunction with their foreign supplier for the safety the product by developing a plan by to ensure that the safety of the product is properly controlled by the foreign supplier. It is the importer’s responsibility to understand the requirements of this rule and implement necessary measures to ensure that their foreign supplier has adequate food safety controls in place.
In some cases, the determination of who the importer is is not easy. Imported foods may by touched by a number of different entities as they make their way into the U.S. The key part of the regulation is to make sure that the importer is identified before the food enters the U.S. FDA requires this in order to assign responsibility for the imported product to that entity. This responsible entity must have a U.S. address where the proper documentation will be kept.
The designated FSVP importer is required, through development of a hazard analysis, to determine what potential hazards, if any, represent a potential risk for the given imported food. For those identified hazards having significant potential risk, the importer must ensure, or verify, that the foreign supplier has adequate controls to prevent or eliminate that risk. As a means of verification, importers can use one or more ways, including implementing testing requirements, conducting food safety audits, and collecting pertinent documentation. Verification must take place beforehand as part of a supplier approval process, and then monitored on an ongoing basis.
Individuals tasked with writing and implementing an a Foreign Supplier Verification Program must be qualified through training to do the task. This can be accomplished through attending a FSVP training course developed by the Food Safety and Preventive Control Alliance (FSPCA) and which is offered by Penn State. This training is not just necessary for those who import foods and therefore must write a FSVP plan. It is also important for U.S. food processors, retailers, and other food businesses who buy food from foreign sources; because in the end, they will also pay a price for a foreign supplier’s inadequate food safety program.
As you can see, the FSVP is complex and requires training to understand how the rule could affect your food operation. Visit the Penn State Extension FSMA website at extension.psu.edu/fsma for more information on the FSVP Rule and when and where Penn State will be offering training.
Links.
Registration site for the Penn State Foreign Supplier Verification Workshop
https://extension.psu.edu/foreign-supplier-verification-workshop
FSMA Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVP) for Importers of Food for Humans and Animals
https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/ucm361902.htm
Friday, February 16, 2018
People Have Gene to Produce Chitin Digesting Enzyme - Please Pass the Stinkbugs
A study in Molecular Biology and Evolution shows that people do have the enzyme that can break down insect casings. Primates, including humans do have the gene that breaks down chitin, the substance that forms the exoskeleton of bugs. Most of us were taught that chitin would not be broken down in our digestive systems. Not so.
An article in National Geographic from 2013, U.N. Urges Eating Insects; 8 Popular Bugs to Try, suggests these bug species:
1. Beetles
2. Butterflies and Moths
3. Bees and wasps
4. Ants
5. Grasshoppers, crickets, and locusts
6. Flies and mosquitos
7. Water boatmen and backswimmers
8. Stinkbugs
Yes, Stinkbugs....from the article "If you can get past the funky smell, these insects apparently add an apple flavor to sauces and are a valuable source of iodine. They're also known to have anesthetic and analgesic properties. Who would have thought?" Not me, that is for sure.
So what wine should we pair with our bowl of crunchy crickets.....a nice grassy sauvignon blanc perhaps? An article on the subject in Food and Wine magazine suggests pairing a Riesling with honey mustard crickets.
IFT Weekly Newsletter
http://www.ift.org/Food-Technology/Newsletters/IFT-Weekly-Newsletter/2018/February/021418.aspx
Study finds most primates, including humans, can digest insects
An article in National Geographic from 2013, U.N. Urges Eating Insects; 8 Popular Bugs to Try, suggests these bug species:
1. Beetles
2. Butterflies and Moths
3. Bees and wasps
4. Ants
5. Grasshoppers, crickets, and locusts
6. Flies and mosquitos
7. Water boatmen and backswimmers
8. Stinkbugs
Yes, Stinkbugs....from the article "If you can get past the funky smell, these insects apparently add an apple flavor to sauces and are a valuable source of iodine. They're also known to have anesthetic and analgesic properties. Who would have thought?" Not me, that is for sure.
So what wine should we pair with our bowl of crunchy crickets.....a nice grassy sauvignon blanc perhaps? An article on the subject in Food and Wine magazine suggests pairing a Riesling with honey mustard crickets.
IFT Weekly Newsletter
http://www.ift.org/Food-Technology/Newsletters/IFT-Weekly-Newsletter/2018/February/021418.aspx
Study finds most primates, including humans, can digest insects
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
Iowa Retailer Recalls Chicken Salad After Reported Cases of Salmonella Infection
An Iowa retailer is recalling chicken salad after the product was linked to several cases of Salmonella infection. The chicken salad was produced by a third party establishment.
Iowa Department of Public Health News Release
Iowa Department of Public Health News Release
https://idph.iowa.gov/News/ArtMID/646/ArticleID/158205/Consumer-Advisory-Issued-for-Chicken-Salad-Purchased-at-Fareway-21318
Consumer Advisory Issued for Chicken Salad Purchased at Fareway (2/13/18)
Author: Polly Carver-Kimm/
Tuesday, February 13, 2018/
Categories: Infectious Disease Prevention
FDA Issues Alert for Raw Pet Food Brands About Potential Pathogens
FDA issued an alert for raw pet food products under the Darwin’s Natural and ZooLogics brand labels. "The FDA is alerting pet owners to a history of four recalls of and multiple complaints associated with Darwin’s Natural and ZooLogics pet foods, manufactured by Arrow Reliance Inc., dba Darwin’s Natural Pet Products, over the period from October 17, 2016 to February 10, 2018. In each instance, the company recalled these products after being alerted to positive findings of Salmonella and/or Listeria monocytogenes in samples of their raw pet food products."
There have been a number of complaints of illness and deaths associated with the product. "As part of an ongoing investigation into complaints associated with products manufactured by Arrow Reliance/Darwin’s Natural of Tukwila, WA, the FDA has confirmed that new samples of Darwin’s Natural Pet Products raw pet foods have tested positive for Salmonella." In addition to illness, there have also been injuries associated with bone shards.
As FDA states on this Alert, "Raw pet food is more likely than other types of pet food to contain Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes. Pet owners who choose to feed raw pet food should be aware of the risks associated with these products." But it further states, "The FDA has a zero-tolerance policy for Salmonella or other pathogenic bacteria in all pet food, meaning the agency will take action, as appropriate, against any pet food found to be contaminated with the harmful bacteria."
So why aren't these processors using High Pressure Processing to eliminate pathogens? Why do we recall it knowing that pathogens can be present? Why do people buy this knowing that the harm to the dog can far outweigh any benefit? Really, if people want to feed raw meat to dogs, buy whole cuts of meat, surface sanitize and cut it yourself. While this will not eliminate the risk completely, it is less risky than buying commercially made product.
FDA Alert
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596594.htm
FDA Investigates Pattern of Contamination in Certain Raw Pet Foods Made by Arrow Reliance Inc., Including Darwin’s Natural Pet Products and ZooLogics Pet Food
For Immediate Release
February 13, 2018
There have been a number of complaints of illness and deaths associated with the product. "As part of an ongoing investigation into complaints associated with products manufactured by Arrow Reliance/Darwin’s Natural of Tukwila, WA, the FDA has confirmed that new samples of Darwin’s Natural Pet Products raw pet foods have tested positive for Salmonella." In addition to illness, there have also been injuries associated with bone shards.
As FDA states on this Alert, "Raw pet food is more likely than other types of pet food to contain Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes. Pet owners who choose to feed raw pet food should be aware of the risks associated with these products." But it further states, "The FDA has a zero-tolerance policy for Salmonella or other pathogenic bacteria in all pet food, meaning the agency will take action, as appropriate, against any pet food found to be contaminated with the harmful bacteria."
So why aren't these processors using High Pressure Processing to eliminate pathogens? Why do we recall it knowing that pathogens can be present? Why do people buy this knowing that the harm to the dog can far outweigh any benefit? Really, if people want to feed raw meat to dogs, buy whole cuts of meat, surface sanitize and cut it yourself. While this will not eliminate the risk completely, it is less risky than buying commercially made product.
FDA Alert
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596594.htm
FDA Investigates Pattern of Contamination in Certain Raw Pet Foods Made by Arrow Reliance Inc., Including Darwin’s Natural Pet Products and ZooLogics Pet Food
For Immediate Release
February 13, 2018
Online Consumer Complaint Portals - Too Much Transparency?
An interesting article in the NY Times titled Too Much Power to the People? A Food Safety Site Tests the Limits discusses the online complaint site IWasPoisoned.com and the impact it has on food companies. According the article, the site has collected about 89,000 reports since starting in 2009. The site provides an outlet for consumers to voice their issues, in this case, the blame for their illness.
The website does review complain submissions and they do provide an opportunity for those establishments which have been blamed for an illness to appeal any complaints.
While it has proved a key for pointing out linkages to foodborne illness associated with less-than-good operators such as Chipolte, there are some major drawbacks of having too much transparency.
"Restaurant executives have criticized IWasPoisoned for allowing anonymous and unverified submissions, which they say leads to false reports and irresponsible fear-mongering. Some public health officials have objected on the grounds that food poisoning victims can’t be trusted to correctly identify what made them sick."
So for one, people can publicly bash a restaurant with out substantiating the restaurants involvement. Depending on the type of agent involved in foodborne illness, the food may have been consumed hours before or days before the symptoms show up. Unfortunately, people are apt to blame the food they last ate.
People may just want to pile on without actually being sick. In some cases, people may do it because they don't like a given food establishment, or perhaps they favor a competitor.
The website does review complain submissions and they do provide an opportunity for those establishments which have been blamed for an illness to appeal any complaints.
However, the high level of transparency makes this information readily available for all, including news media outlets who are always hungry to report an outbreak of foodborne illness.
One fact is interesting in how a website like this makes money - they provide an early warning to investor and others willing to pay for leads on a given restaurant that may be involved in an outbreak scenario.
NY Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/13/business/too-much-power-to-the-people-a-food-safety-site-tests-the-limits.html
Business Day
Too Much Power to the People? A Food Safety Site Tests the Limits
The Shift
By KEVIN ROOSE FEB. 13, 2018
NY Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/13/business/too-much-power-to-the-people-a-food-safety-site-tests-the-limits.html
Business Day
Too Much Power to the People? A Food Safety Site Tests the Limits
The Shift
By KEVIN ROOSE FEB. 13, 2018
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Dog Treats Recalled After Positive Laboratory Test
A CA pet products company is recalling a single product, bully stick dog chews, after the Colorado Department of Agriculture found that a single sample collected from a retail location detected positive for Salmonella. According to the owner, every product lot before it tested before it leaves the manufacturing plant. This lot code in question was tested both at the company lab as well as by a third-party testing facility.
Hopefully the positive was analyzed to determine that it was not from the laboratory. But conducting further analysis, specifically DNA testing, will help in determining the source and whether this organism was transient or established within the facility.
Is it possible for a facility to do finished product testing and still have a positive sampling? Absolutely. Small levels of contamination may not be found by limited finished product testing. More important is having a comprehensive monitoring system that focuses on the environment.
FDA Recall Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596190.htm
Redbarn Pet Products Issues Voluntary Recall of Dog Chews
For Immediate Release
February 9, 2018
Hopefully the positive was analyzed to determine that it was not from the laboratory. But conducting further analysis, specifically DNA testing, will help in determining the source and whether this organism was transient or established within the facility.
Is it possible for a facility to do finished product testing and still have a positive sampling? Absolutely. Small levels of contamination may not be found by limited finished product testing. More important is having a comprehensive monitoring system that focuses on the environment.
FDA Recall Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596190.htm
Redbarn Pet Products Issues Voluntary Recall of Dog Chews
For Immediate Release
February 9, 2018
Study Assesses Exposure to PAA for Food Processing Employee Safety
With peracetic acid (PAA) being used more in food processing operations, a study reported in Meatingplace looked at exposure levels to employees who work in poultry facilities. In summary, the level of exposure to employees was below proposed threshold limits for health and safety, but the researchers recommended additional work is needed.
Meatingplace - Industry News - AM
Meatingplace - Industry News - AM
http://www.meatingplace.com/Industry/News/Details/78054
Study assesses poultry workers’ exposure to peracetic acid
By Tom Johnston on 2/13/2018
Study assesses poultry workers’ exposure to peracetic acid
By Tom Johnston on 2/13/2018
Monday, February 12, 2018
FDA Releases 2017 Food Code - What's New in the Regulation
FDA released the 2017 version of the Food Code. The Food Code is a model for ensuring safe food that is provided for adoption by local, state, and federal governmental jurisdictions for administration to food service, retail food stores, or food vending operations. Every 4 years, a new version is issued with updates. According to the release, there are 4 significant changes.
Item #1 - Revised requirement for the Person in Charge (PIC) to be a Certified Food Protection Manager (CFPM) (Section 2-102.12)
What’s changed – in the 2013 version, section 2-102.12 specifies that one person within the operation be a certified person. The update removes the 'one person' but puts in that the person in charge is teh certified person. The change makes the regulation less prescriptive, so instead of saying at least one person, now it says whoever has the duties of the person in change (2-103.11), that person has to be certified. This may make it easier for small multi-unit operations to comply.
Item #2 - Added a new section that addresses the use of bandages, finger cots or finger stalls (Section 2-401.13)
What’s new – This section was added into the code. While covered in the ServSafe training, covering a wound on the hand is now detailed in the regulation - the wound is covered by bandage or cot (or stall) and then covered by a glove. (A finger cot and stall are essentially the same, but a stall generally refers to a finger covering that has a support back to the wrist).
LINK to 2017 Food Code
The specific sections are covered below showing impacted sections of the regulation.
FDA Constituent Update
LINK To Announcement
FDA Releases 2017 Food Code
Item #1 - Revised requirement for the Person in Charge (PIC) to be a Certified Food Protection Manager (CFPM) (Section 2-102.12)
What’s changed – in the 2013 version, section 2-102.12 specifies that one person within the operation be a certified person. The update removes the 'one person' but puts in that the person in charge is teh certified person. The change makes the regulation less prescriptive, so instead of saying at least one person, now it says whoever has the duties of the person in change (2-103.11), that person has to be certified. This may make it easier for small multi-unit operations to comply.
Item #2 - Added a new section that addresses the use of bandages, finger cots or finger stalls (Section 2-401.13)
What’s new – This section was added into the code. While covered in the ServSafe training, covering a wound on the hand is now detailed in the regulation - the wound is covered by bandage or cot (or stall) and then covered by a glove. (A finger cot and stall are essentially the same, but a stall generally refers to a finger covering that has a support back to the wrist).
Item #3 Harmonized cooking time/temperature parameters for intact and non-intact meat and poultry in accordance with guidance from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) (Section 3-401.11)
What's changed - There are two significant changes here - the first is the dwell time for ground meat, injected meat, mechanically tenderized meat - it is 155ºF for 17 seconds, instead of 15 seconds. The second is for poultry and stuffed meat - the temperature is 165ºF is an instantaneous time, instead of of what is listed in the earlier versions as 15 seconds.
Item #4 Updated procedures for retail food establishment operations to continue during an extended water or electrical outage if a written emergency operation plan has been pre-approved by the Regulatory Authority, immediate corrective action taken and the Regulatory Authority has been notified upon implementation of the plan (Section 8-404.11)
What's changed - More detail was added to the regulation about continuing operation when an outage of electrical or water service is encountered. It gives the regulatory authority and the operator means of writing and approving a plan provided there is no risk.
The specific sections are covered below showing impacted sections of the regulation.
FDA Constituent Update
LINK To Announcement
FDA Releases 2017 Food Code
Friday, February 9, 2018
Recall Data from Past Five Years - What is Changing?
Each quarter, Stericycle Expert Solutions releases their Recall Index which analyzes the frequency, volume, and causes of U.S. product recalls. This week they issued a 5 year summary of making these reports. From this article, Reflections on Recalls: Five Years of the Stericycle Expert Solutions Recall Index
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reflections-on-recalls-five-years-of-the-stericycle-expert-solutions-recall-index-300594063.html
Reflections on Recalls: Five Years of the Stericycle Expert Solutions Recall Index
Q4 2017 Recall Index Reveals Zero Fines for Consumer Products, Continued Decreases in Medical Device Recalls, and Severity of Drug Recalls Continuing to Rise, Among Other Findings
"The food and beverage industry experienced the most dramatic spike in units recalled over the past five years. Food products recalled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) skyrocketed 92.7 percent since 2012, and recalled pounds regulated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which largely oversees meat production, jumped 83.4 percent in the same period. Technological improvements in food testing, combined with factory farming and growing automation in food production were major drivers of the increases. "Many have interpreted this report to make it seem like things are out of control. Not really. Increased testing, improved testing, and a risk-averse public have more to do with the number of recalls. Our systems of supply have not changed as much as our testing requirements and capabilities and with that, our threshold for the issues that are found. Because of this, our food supply is becoming more safe, not less safe.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reflections-on-recalls-five-years-of-the-stericycle-expert-solutions-recall-index-300594063.html
Reflections on Recalls: Five Years of the Stericycle Expert Solutions Recall Index
Q4 2017 Recall Index Reveals Zero Fines for Consumer Products, Continued Decreases in Medical Device Recalls, and Severity of Drug Recalls Continuing to Rise, Among Other Findings
FDA Has Increased Number of Imported Shrimp Refusals
According to Seafood Source, the FDA has had an increase in the number of import refusals for shrimp in the month of January. The issues were due to the presence of Salmonella while others were rejected for the presence of banned antibiotics.
As stated in the article, many of these suppliers are on import alert which holds the import until the proper testing can be completed. Once a supplier is place on import alert, it can be very difficult to get off of that list.
Seafood Source
https://www.seafoodsource.com/news/food-safety-health/fdas-shrimp-import-refusals-rose-in-january
FDA’s shrimp import refusals rose in January
By Christine Blank
https://www.seafoodsource.com/news/food-safety-health/fdas-shrimp-import-refusals-rose-in-january
FDA’s shrimp import refusals rose in January
By Christine Blank
Lawsuit Against Cruise Line After Ship Has Eight Consecutive Norovirus Outbreaks
In 2016/2017, there was a norovirus outbreak on eight consecutive cruises on the Sun Princess cruise ship. A lawsuit is being filed that "Carnival was negligent in its sanitation of the vessel, leading to continued outbreaks." While the ship has had satisfactory inspection, this case points to the difficulty of eliminating an pathogen such as norovirus.
Norovirus is highly infectious, so there does not need for a lot of virus particle to be present. As a non-enveloped virus, it can remain on surfaces for weeks. Thirdly, it is resistant to normal strength sanitizers, so you have to clean and then hit with a strong sanitizer. This can be a problem when the particles get onto carpeting, bedding, and other non-easy-to-clean surfaces. Add this to the fact that these cruise ships are huge - this one has a capacity over 2000 passengers with 15 decks, 1000 cabins, and a slew of lounges, bars, and recreational areas. And then, if the article below is correct, they are turning this ship around for the next cruise in hours.
Miami Herald
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/tourism-cruises/article198720189.html
On eight cruises in a row, passengers got ‘violently ill.’ A lawsuit may be coming
By Chabeli Herrera cherrera@miamiherald.com
February 06, 2018 06:00 PM
Updated February 07, 2018 03:10 PM
Miami Herald
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/tourism-cruises/article198720189.html
On eight cruises in a row, passengers got ‘violently ill.’ A lawsuit may be coming
By Chabeli Herrera cherrera@miamiherald.com
February 06, 2018 06:00 PM
Updated February 07, 2018 03:10 PM
Pork Extract Broth Recalled for Improper Processing
An Okla. establishment, is recalling approximately 4,202 pounds of fully cooked pork products due to a processing deviation that may have allowed potential spore-forming pathogen growth including Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium perfringens, It is a paitan which is a soup base made from meat, bone and cartilage extract, so contains fats and collagen to form a hearty thick broth.
This product is a cooked product that is packed in plastic pouches (pillow pack) and then frozen. This is used as an ingredient. Processing is not designed to rid products of spores, so the issue would have had to have been related to the cooling to freezing. If not cooled properly, Clostridial spores, which survive the cooking, would have had an opportunity to grow.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-009-2018-release
Guymon Extracts, Inc. Recalls Fully Cooked Pork Products Due to Possible Processing Deviation
Class I Recall
009-2018
Health Risk: High
Feb 6, 2018
This product is a cooked product that is packed in plastic pouches (pillow pack) and then frozen. This is used as an ingredient. Processing is not designed to rid products of spores, so the issue would have had to have been related to the cooling to freezing. If not cooled properly, Clostridial spores, which survive the cooking, would have had an opportunity to grow.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-009-2018-release
Guymon Extracts, Inc. Recalls Fully Cooked Pork Products Due to Possible Processing Deviation
Class I Recall
009-2018
Health Risk: High
Feb 6, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Product - Week Ending February 9, 2018
Wasabi Almonds Packaged in an Unsalted Almond Package - Kanan Enterprises announces the voluntary recall of Southern Grove Unsalted Almond 14 oz., Best By SEP 25 2018 KN due to the presence of wheat and soy that are not listed as ingredients. The company was notified by a customer that wasabi almonds were packaged in a bag of Southern Grove Unsalted Almonds.
In-store Label Missing Allergens Associated with Mayonnaise and Sour Cream - Weis Markets today announced it had issued a recall for its store-made Weis Quality Dried Beef Party Rye dip for failing to list egg and milk allergens on its label.
In-store Label Missing Allergens Leaves Out Milk - Weis Markets today announced it had issued a recall for its pre-made Penne Pasta with Asiago Sauce and Grilled Chicken single serving meal for failing to list a milk allergen on its label. The problem was discovered during a label review.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm595459.htm
Kanan Enterprises Conducts Voluntary Recall of Southern Grove Unsalted Almond Due to Undeclared Wheat and Soy
For Immediate Release
February 2, 2018
Contact
Consumers 1-800-860-5464
In-store Label Missing Allergens Associated with Mayonnaise and Sour Cream - Weis Markets today announced it had issued a recall for its store-made Weis Quality Dried Beef Party Rye dip for failing to list egg and milk allergens on its label.
In-store Label Missing Allergens Leaves Out Milk - Weis Markets today announced it had issued a recall for its pre-made Penne Pasta with Asiago Sauce and Grilled Chicken single serving meal for failing to list a milk allergen on its label. The problem was discovered during a label review.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm595459.htm
Kanan Enterprises Conducts Voluntary Recall of Southern Grove Unsalted Almond Due to Undeclared Wheat and Soy
For Immediate Release
February 2, 2018
Contact
Consumers 1-800-860-5464
Retailer Recalls Yogurt for Potential Glass Contamination
Meijer is recalling of their Greek and Low-fat yogurt as a precautionary measure due to the potential risk of a small glass particles after customer returned a yogurt cup containing two small pieces of glass. "Upon investigation at the retailer’s manufacturing facility, there may have been a possible risk of contamination."
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596050.htm
Meijer Recalls Select Meijer Greek and Low Fat Yogurt Products
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596050.htm
Meijer Recalls Select Meijer Greek and Low Fat Yogurt Products
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
Raw Ground Turkey Pet Food Recalled for Salmonella Contamination
A Minnesota Pet Food Company, Raw for Paws, is recalling its Ground Turkey Pet Food after two reported illnesses and "testing by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) revealed the presence of Salmonella in some packages of Turkey Pet Food."
Raw ground turkey AND Salmonella...is this surprising?....wouldn't one think that there may be some Salmonella present?. Tried to determine if this product was HPP processed, but the company website is down. The company does have safe handling instructions, but of course does not include cooking.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596043.htm
Raws For Paws Recalls Turkey Pet Food Because of Possible Salmonella Health Risk
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
Raw ground turkey AND Salmonella...is this surprising?....wouldn't one think that there may be some Salmonella present?. Tried to determine if this product was HPP processed, but the company website is down. The company does have safe handling instructions, but of course does not include cooking.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596043.htm
Raws For Paws Recalls Turkey Pet Food Because of Possible Salmonella Health Risk
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
Beefy Munchies Dog Treats Recalled After Salmonella Positive Test
A California Pet Food company, Smokehouse Pet Products, Inc. "is recalling 4-oz bags of dog treats labeled as “Beefy Munchies,” because it has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella." The issue was found through routine sampling by the Colorado Department of Agriculture which resulted in a Salmonella positive sample.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596038.htm
Smokehouse Pet Products Inc Recalls Limited Lots of “Beefy Munchies” Sold Regionally Because of Possible Salmonella Contamination
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596038.htm
Smokehouse Pet Products Inc Recalls Limited Lots of “Beefy Munchies” Sold Regionally Because of Possible Salmonella Contamination
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
A CO Eatery Responsible for 33 Cases of Salmonella Infection
A Denver CO Mexican Eatery has been identified as the source of a Salmonella outbreak that sickened 33 and one death. One of the ill was an employee. The outbreak occurred back in November
As part of the investigation, a facility inspection was conducted on November 22, 2017. "Health department officials found four “critical” violations: cross-contamination, improper or lack of hand washing, improper hot-holding of foods, improper cooling of foods and lack of hot water at a hand sink." The food inspector recommended that “food safety training is strongly recommended.” Follow-up visits were conducted in November and December to determine whether their recommendations were followed. "Follow-up inspections, however, found there were “continued problems” with cross-contamination, improper washing of the hands, improper hot-holding of foods, improper cooling of foods, and a lack of hot water at a hand sink."
At what point does one shut down a facility?
Denver Ch 7 ABC
https://www.thedenverchannel.com/lifestyle/health/one-dead-33-others-sickened-after-salmonella-outbreak-at-aurora-restaurant-health-department-says?page=2
One dead, 33 others sickened after salmonella outbreak at Aurora restaurant, health department says
By: Oscar Contreras
Posted: 12:09 AM, Feb 9, 2018
Updated: 12:09 AM, Feb 9, 2018
As part of the investigation, a facility inspection was conducted on November 22, 2017. "Health department officials found four “critical” violations: cross-contamination, improper or lack of hand washing, improper hot-holding of foods, improper cooling of foods and lack of hot water at a hand sink." The food inspector recommended that “food safety training is strongly recommended.” Follow-up visits were conducted in November and December to determine whether their recommendations were followed. "Follow-up inspections, however, found there were “continued problems” with cross-contamination, improper washing of the hands, improper hot-holding of foods, improper cooling of foods, and a lack of hot water at a hand sink."
At what point does one shut down a facility?
https://www.thedenverchannel.com/lifestyle/health/one-dead-33-others-sickened-after-salmonella-outbreak-at-aurora-restaurant-health-department-says?page=2
One dead, 33 others sickened after salmonella outbreak at Aurora restaurant, health department says
By: Oscar Contreras
Posted: 12:09 AM, Feb 9, 2018
Updated: 12:09 AM, Feb 9, 2018
Tuesday, February 6, 2018
Ozone as a Sanitizing Agent - Applications and Limitations
There have been many questions on the use of ozone in food operations, specifically fruit. An article in Growing Produce provides a good synopsis of the advantages and limitations of ozone as a sanitize. In summary, ozone is not a magic bullet and does not provide tremendous results in fresh produce packing. In the author's opinion, "the most straightforward and beneficial use of ozone in fruit handling and packing is as a terminal rinse step and as the post-ultrafiltration treatment of re-circulated water in postharvest wash and fluming systems". "Another commonly beneficial application is cold storage or forced-air treatment with gaseous ozone or room fogging."
One issue is that some product are more susceptible to the ozone that results in damage compared to the microbes. Ozone is a strong oxidizer, but gets utilized quickly. Notice that in the two suggested applications, water and air treatment, are essentially applications that do not come in direct contact with the food.
Growing Produce
http://www.growingproduce.com/fruits/food-safety-ozone/
Food Safety: Once More Into the Ozone
By Trevor Suslow|February 3, 2018
Growing Produce
http://www.growingproduce.com/fruits/food-safety-ozone/
Food Safety: Once More Into the Ozone
By Trevor Suslow|February 3, 2018
Friday, February 2, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Product - Week Ending 2/2/18
Milk Missing on Beef Jerky Label - A Mass. establishment, is recalling approximately 1,391 pounds of beef jerky products due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen - the products contain milk which is not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered by FSIS personnel during routine verification activities. Likely issue - Inadequate label approval process
Kimchi Product Recalled After Allergenic Reaction to Shellfish - JFC International Inc. of Los Angeles, CA is voluntarily recalling a Kimchi Hot Pot Soup Base because it was found to contain undeclared Crustacean Shellfish (Shrimp, Crab). The recall was initiated after JFC was notified of an allergic reaction by a consumer who consumed this product. Likely issue - cross contamination due to poor sanitation, or an ingredient issue
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-007-2018-release
Whip City Jerky, LLC Recalls Beef Jerky Products Due to Misbranding and an Undeclared Allergen
Kimchi Product Recalled After Allergenic Reaction to Shellfish - JFC International Inc. of Los Angeles, CA is voluntarily recalling a Kimchi Hot Pot Soup Base because it was found to contain undeclared Crustacean Shellfish (Shrimp, Crab). The recall was initiated after JFC was notified of an allergic reaction by a consumer who consumed this product. Likely issue - cross contamination due to poor sanitation, or an ingredient issue
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-007-2018-release
Whip City Jerky, LLC Recalls Beef Jerky Products Due to Misbranding and an Undeclared Allergen
Salmonella Outbreak Strain in French Baby Milk Facility For Over a Decade
Researchers have determined that the strain of Salmonella found in an European outbreak linked to baby milk product is the same that caused an outbreak in 2005 from the same facility. The facility, which is owned by Lactalis since 2006, was "closed in December after it emerged that contamination had started in one [of two] of its drying towers". Of course the question is...has this milk caused any other illnesses over the past decade.
For a strain of Salmonella to persist in a facility for over a decade is not unusual, and points to the difficulty of eradicating an entrenched environmental contaminate like Salmonella. In a news article, it was stated that the current outbreak began after construction was conducted. "It is thought that the disassembly of partitions and repair of floors in the building at the beginning of 2017, may have led to the accidental release of the bacteria, despite controls put in place to contain the spaces under construction." And this type of event may provide the organism to reemerge from a subterranean location. If they occurred, probably not at a sufficient level to raise concern.
I think it is also important to point out that the company had been doing testing. The facility "conducted more than 16,000 analyzes on finished products, all of which proved to be compliant." This points to the limitations of testing when one is looking for small levels of contamination.
BBC News
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42908706
Lactalis baby milk scare in France: Salmonella taint 'began in 2005'
1 February 2018
BBC News
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42908706
Lactalis baby milk scare in France: Salmonella taint 'began in 2005'
1 February 2018
Thursday, February 1, 2018
CDC MMWR - Pet Rats Source of Seoul Virus (a Type of Hantavirus) - 2017
Considering a new pet rat? Well, as part of the assessment, you may need to consider Seoul virus. A report in MMWR reviews a 2017 outbreak of Seoul virus that had been linked to pet Norway rats. In addition to two individuals who became ill and 183 who were serum positive, "the investigation identified 31 facilities in 11 states with human and/or rat Seoul virus infections; six facilities also reported exchanging rats with Canadian ratteries."
Seoul virus is a type of hantavirus that causes symptoms ranging from mild influenza-like illness to severe disease with kidney failure and even death. Norway rats are an asymptomatic carriers for the virus and transmit this virus to humans through contact with contaminated rat urine or droppings, or inhalation of virus particles in dust from contaminated bedding. This is the first known case of pet rats being the source for human infection.
Norway rats, also known as brown rats, are considered a pest for food operations and can be the source of a number of different pathogens. With a high birth rate and a diet that can consist of most anything, rat issues in a food facility can be an issue, being very difficult to eradicate once the rodents become established. So the thought of owning a rat, is difficult for many.. And now, if this Seoul virus is not enough to make you think twice, just have to watch Willard.
CDC MMWR
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6704a5.htm?s_cid=mm6704a5_e
Outbreak of Seoul Virus Among Rats and Rat Owners — United States and Canada, 2017
Seoul virus is a type of hantavirus that causes symptoms ranging from mild influenza-like illness to severe disease with kidney failure and even death. Norway rats are an asymptomatic carriers for the virus and transmit this virus to humans through contact with contaminated rat urine or droppings, or inhalation of virus particles in dust from contaminated bedding. This is the first known case of pet rats being the source for human infection.
Norway rats, also known as brown rats, are considered a pest for food operations and can be the source of a number of different pathogens. With a high birth rate and a diet that can consist of most anything, rat issues in a food facility can be an issue, being very difficult to eradicate once the rodents become established. So the thought of owning a rat, is difficult for many.. And now, if this Seoul virus is not enough to make you think twice, just have to watch Willard.
CDC MMWR
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6704a5.htm?s_cid=mm6704a5_e
Outbreak of Seoul Virus Among Rats and Rat Owners — United States and Canada, 2017
Wednesday, January 31, 2018
What is the Likelihood That Salmonella is On Your Chicken...or Beef...or Pork
USDA FSIS released their yearly sampling results that indicate the prevalence, or percent positive samples, for raw meat products. As FSIS points out, "These calculations may vary significantly from the actual prevalence of the population, but FSIS cannot make a more precise calculation with the data currently available." It is important to note that this does not evaluate the amount present, only if any are present.
Beef - In ground meat, Salmonella was present in just over 2% of the samples while pathogenic E. coli was present in 0.05% of samples. While the prevalence of E. coli is low, there is still a risk of it being present, and considering the seriousness of the illness (and the fact that Salmonella could be present as well) it still remains important to cook meat to the proper temperature.
Pork - While there is extremely low to no risk for pathogenic E. coli, there is a higher risk of Salmonella being present in pork compared to beef. For cuts, the prevalence of Salmonella is over 7%, but in comminuted pork meat (ground, stuff used in sausages), the prevalence is 22 percent. Cook those brats to the right temperature.
Chicken - as the chicken moves from whole to parts to ground, the prevalence increases for both Salmonella and Campylobacter. For whole chickens, there is a prevalence of 5.8% for Salmonella and 1.9% for Campylobacter. In mechanically separated meat, the prevalence is almost 76% for Salmonella and 23% for Campylobacter.
Turkey - the stated prevalence is lower than that for chicken with whole birds at 0.56% for Salmonella and 0.16% for Campylobacter. Much of difference between whole turkey and chicken may be due in part to how they are sampled, with a sponge being used for turkeys and a whole bird rinse used for chickens.
In the end, the risk is there, so it remains important to properly cook raw meat and poultry products. And of course, to use a thermometer to verify.
Beef - In ground meat, Salmonella was present in just over 2% of the samples while pathogenic E. coli was present in 0.05% of samples. While the prevalence of E. coli is low, there is still a risk of it being present, and considering the seriousness of the illness (and the fact that Salmonella could be present as well) it still remains important to cook meat to the proper temperature.
Pork - While there is extremely low to no risk for pathogenic E. coli, there is a higher risk of Salmonella being present in pork compared to beef. For cuts, the prevalence of Salmonella is over 7%, but in comminuted pork meat (ground, stuff used in sausages), the prevalence is 22 percent. Cook those brats to the right temperature.
Chicken - as the chicken moves from whole to parts to ground, the prevalence increases for both Salmonella and Campylobacter. For whole chickens, there is a prevalence of 5.8% for Salmonella and 1.9% for Campylobacter. In mechanically separated meat, the prevalence is almost 76% for Salmonella and 23% for Campylobacter.
Turkey - the stated prevalence is lower than that for chicken with whole birds at 0.56% for Salmonella and 0.16% for Campylobacter. Much of difference between whole turkey and chicken may be due in part to how they are sampled, with a sponge being used for turkeys and a whole bird rinse used for chickens.
In the end, the risk is there, so it remains important to properly cook raw meat and poultry products. And of course, to use a thermometer to verify.
Monday, January 29, 2018
Panera Recalls Cream Cheese Products After Positive Listeria Sample
Panera Bread is conducting a recall of all 2 oz. and 8 oz. cream cheese products sold in its U.S. bakery-cafes. This recall was initiated after samples of one variety of 2 oz. cream cheese from a single production day showed a positive result for the presence of Listeria monocytogenes. The company is recalling all varieties of unexpired 2 oz. and 8 oz. cream cheese products with an expiration date on or before 4/2/18, even though it was found in only one production run.
Recalling all unexpired product is a preemptive move. Too often with Listeria related recalls, companies try to minimize the recall to the one date only to have to recall additional product when they find they did not have sufficient control on Listeria in the processing environment.
FDA Recal Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm594219.htm
Panera Bread Preemptively Recalls All 2 oz. and 8 oz. Cream Cheese ProductsFor Immediate Release
January 28, 2018
Recalling all unexpired product is a preemptive move. Too often with Listeria related recalls, companies try to minimize the recall to the one date only to have to recall additional product when they find they did not have sufficient control on Listeria in the processing environment.
FDA Recal Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm594219.htm
Panera Bread Preemptively Recalls All 2 oz. and 8 oz. Cream Cheese ProductsFor Immediate Release
January 28, 2018
Neglected Parasitic Infections of Poverty - Impact on Mental Health
An article in the NY Times brings to light the issue of neglected parasitic infections that may impact mental health. In this case, Toxocara, a roundworm that lives in the intestines of stray or poorly kept cats and dogs, that can have health impacts on humans who become infected - breathing, liver function, eyesight and even intelligence. The impact of infection on the brain is not well understood, but "has been linked to lower intelligence and epilepsy". This is an issue in poorer areas where there are more stray cats and dogs.
Another common parasitic infection, that from Taxoplasmosis gondii, has been linked to cases of schizophrenia. As we know, cats are a definitive host for this parasite.
Another common parasitic infection, that from Taxoplasmosis gondii, has been linked to cases of schizophrenia. As we know, cats are a definitive host for this parasite.
In a 2014 piece sited in the NY Times article, the author discusses a group of parasites that have been linked to mental performance and illness. The author states, "These chronic infections may partially account for the achievement gap noted among socioeconomically disadvantaged students." He further states, "additional information has determined that the neglected infections of poverty also cause important psychiatric and neurological effects on vulnerable populations in the southern United States." A table from that article summarizes this impact.
(Hotez, 2014. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(10):1099-1100)
CDC web site for neglected parasitic infections (NPIs).
JAMA Psychiatry
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/1895572
Neglected Infections of Poverty in the United States and Their Effects on the Brain
Peter J. Hotez, MD, PhD1,2,3
Author Affiliations |Article Information
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(10):1099-1100. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1045
CDC web site for neglected parasitic infections (NPIs).
JAMA Psychiatry
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/1895572
Neglected Infections of Poverty in the United States and Their Effects on the Brain
Peter J. Hotez, MD, PhD1,2,3
Author Affiliations |Article Information
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71(10):1099-1100. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1045
Friday, January 26, 2018
Federal Court Upholds Hefty Prison Sentences for PCA Executives in 2008 Salmonella Outbreak
A federal appeals court upheld the sentences handed down in the Peanut Corporation of America case where Salmonella-contaminated peanut butter was allowed to be sold by company executives.
- PCA president Stewart Parnell’s 28-year prison term
- Operation manager - Michael Parnell’s 20-year prison sentence
In this 2008/2009 outbreak, over 700 people become infected with Salmonella after eating the contaminated PCA peanut products. "The outbreak led to one of the largest food recalls in U.S. history, and Peanut Corp. permanently shuttered its operations. Stewart Parnell had directed PCA to retest products that had tested positive for salmonella until a negative result was obtained, the appeals court said. The company also shipped peanut products before receiving test results and even shipped products after receiving confirmed, positive results."
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
http://www.myajc.com/news/court-upholds-lengthy-sentences-for-peanut-corp-executives/cDazByM3FkHtN1FMDeqA4N/
Court upholds stiff sentences for Peanut Corp. executives
President serving 28 years in deadly salmonella case
By Bill Rankin - The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Posted: 3:23 p.m. Thursday, January 25, 2018
- PCA president Stewart Parnell’s 28-year prison term
- Operation manager - Michael Parnell’s 20-year prison sentence
- Quality assurance director - Mary Wilkerson- 5-year prison sentence
In this 2008/2009 outbreak, over 700 people become infected with Salmonella after eating the contaminated PCA peanut products. "The outbreak led to one of the largest food recalls in U.S. history, and Peanut Corp. permanently shuttered its operations. Stewart Parnell had directed PCA to retest products that had tested positive for salmonella until a negative result was obtained, the appeals court said. The company also shipped peanut products before receiving test results and even shipped products after receiving confirmed, positive results."
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
http://www.myajc.com/news/court-upholds-lengthy-sentences-for-peanut-corp-executives/cDazByM3FkHtN1FMDeqA4N/
Court upholds stiff sentences for Peanut Corp. executives
President serving 28 years in deadly salmonella case
By Bill Rankin - The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Posted: 3:23 p.m. Thursday, January 25, 2018
California - Health Officials Warn People to Be Aware of Poisonous Wild Mushrooms
California officials warn consumers about the risks of eating wild mushrooms that may be poisonous. In over 14 months, there have been 1,038 reported cases where poisonous mushrooms were ingested. Some of these cases resulted in severe health issues including liver failure.
Generally, wild mushrooms are not allowed to be offered for sales. This is because of the difficulty in determining how to approve a 'wild mushroom expert'.
Generally, wild mushrooms are not allowed to be offered for sales. This is because of the difficulty in determining how to approve a 'wild mushroom expert'.
From the US Food Code - 3-201.16 Wild Mushrooms.
Frozen RTE Meatballs Recalled Due to Listeria Concerns
Rich Products Corporation, a Vineland, N.J. establishment, is recalling approximately 3,420 pounds of RTE beef meatball products produced on Dec 17, 2017 due to the potential for Listeria contamination. "The problem was discovered on Jan. 24, 2018 when FSIS received notification from the firm that they shipped adulterated product into commerce."
A concern for FSIS is that because this is a frozen product, people may have put into freezers and not check to see if this is the recalled lot. Another concern may be that if this one lot is positive for Listeria, what about other other production lots.
While it is not indicated how the company determined the product had a Listeria contamination issue, it is important to note that the product was produced over a month prior to issuing the recall. So either internal testing was delayed or a customer company did the testing. If the former, then one would expect a test-and-hold procedure for the frozen product.
The risk - although this product will likely be heated before being served, as a fully cooked product, the heating instructions will be for heat and serve rather than fully cooking the product. The heat-and-serve heating conditions may not be sufficient to eliminate the organisms present.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-006-2018-release
Rich Products Corporation Recalls Beef Products due to Possible Listeria Contamination
Class I Recall
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-006-2018-release
Rich Products Corporation Recalls Beef Products due to Possible Listeria Contamination
Class I Recall
006-2018
Health Risk: High
Health Risk: High
Jan 24, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Products - Week Ending 1/26/18
Eggs not on Label - Perdue Foods LLC, a Monterey, Tenn. establishment, is recalling approximately 530 pounds of chicken products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens -the product contains eggs which is not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered by the firm while performing routine label verification activities.
Supplier Mislabels Protein Source - Bulletproof 360, Inc. is voluntarily recalling one lot #1017088 of Bulletproof Collagen Protein dietary supplement due to undeclared milk. This voluntary recall was initiated after we discovered that bulk whey (milk) protein was mis-labeled as collagen protein by our third-party manufacturer during the manufacturing process.
Wrong Label Applied - Sun Noodle of Carlstadt, NJ is voluntarily recalling one lot of their retail Tonkotsu Ramen because it is mis-labeled. While it is labeled Tonkotsu, the actual flavor packet inside is Assari Shoyu, which contains an additional undeclared allergen of fish (sardines). The decision to recall this product was initiated after it was discovered that the product had the wrong label applied to the product, and did not accurately represent what was packaged. Subsequent investigation indicated that the problem was caused by mis-labeling of the product at the New Jersey facility.
Allergens and Colors Missing from Label - A Puerto Rico company is collecting the following PACHECO brand products because they may contain undeclared allergens (Wheat, Soy, Egg, Milk) and artificial colors not listed in ingredients (Red # 40, Yellow # 5, Yellow # 6.)
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-005-2018-release
Perdue Foods LLC Recalls Chicken Products due to Misbranding and Undeclared Allergens
Class I Recall 005-2018
Health Risk: High
Jan 23, 2018
Wrong Label Applied - Sun Noodle of Carlstadt, NJ is voluntarily recalling one lot of their retail Tonkotsu Ramen because it is mis-labeled. While it is labeled Tonkotsu, the actual flavor packet inside is Assari Shoyu, which contains an additional undeclared allergen of fish (sardines). The decision to recall this product was initiated after it was discovered that the product had the wrong label applied to the product, and did not accurately represent what was packaged. Subsequent investigation indicated that the problem was caused by mis-labeling of the product at the New Jersey facility.
Allergens and Colors Missing from Label - A Puerto Rico company is collecting the following PACHECO brand products because they may contain undeclared allergens (Wheat, Soy, Egg, Milk) and artificial colors not listed in ingredients (Red # 40, Yellow # 5, Yellow # 6.)
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-005-2018-release
Perdue Foods LLC Recalls Chicken Products due to Misbranding and Undeclared Allergens
Class I Recall 005-2018
Health Risk: High
Jan 23, 2018
Frozen Green Beans and Mixed Veggies Recalled After Pet Food Customer Test Indicates Listeria
National Frozen Foods Corporation (NFFC) is voluntarily recalling a limited quantity of Not-Ready-To Eat IQF green beans and IQF mixed vegetables because they have the potential to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. The recall was initiated based on a 3rd party test result of the IQF Green Beans only by a downstream customer that revealed that the finished products may potentially be contaminated with the bacteria.
This customer was a company who manufactured foods for pets using restaurant grade ingredients. They also issued a recall for the pet foods. "JustFoodForDogs (JFFD) of Los Alamitos, CA, is voluntarily recalling its Beef & Russet Potato, Fish & Sweet Potato and Turducken dog food meals in all sizes. JFFD uses 100% USDA and other restaurant grade ingredients in all of its pet food, and because the green beans used in these meals may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes". "While testing demonstrates that only several dates of production were affected, out of an abundance of caution, JFFD is recalling all of the above mentioned products made from the dates of November 1, 2017 through January 14, 2018. These represent Best By lot code dates on all three of the JustFoodForDogs’ recalled products of 11/01/18 through 01/14/19."
This is another case of a not-ready-to-eat product being recalled for Listeria. In this case, a the pet food customer who purchased this product to use as an ingredient in making another product, tested and found Listeria. Was this customer considering this a RTE product or did the see that there may be some issue where the product coudl be under-cooked? Regardless, it then triggered the selling company to issue a recall, and thus affecting product sold to customers that would not have had any issue because they would have followed label instructions for cooking.
This customer was a company who manufactured foods for pets using restaurant grade ingredients. They also issued a recall for the pet foods. "JustFoodForDogs (JFFD) of Los Alamitos, CA, is voluntarily recalling its Beef & Russet Potato, Fish & Sweet Potato and Turducken dog food meals in all sizes. JFFD uses 100% USDA and other restaurant grade ingredients in all of its pet food, and because the green beans used in these meals may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes". "While testing demonstrates that only several dates of production were affected, out of an abundance of caution, JFFD is recalling all of the above mentioned products made from the dates of November 1, 2017 through January 14, 2018. These represent Best By lot code dates on all three of the JustFoodForDogs’ recalled products of 11/01/18 through 01/14/19."
This is another case of a not-ready-to-eat product being recalled for Listeria. In this case, a the pet food customer who purchased this product to use as an ingredient in making another product, tested and found Listeria. Was this customer considering this a RTE product or did the see that there may be some issue where the product coudl be under-cooked? Regardless, it then triggered the selling company to issue a recall, and thus affecting product sold to customers that would not have had any issue because they would have followed label instructions for cooking.
For the seller, this information needs to be part of the sales agreement with a realistic understanding of the capabilities of meeting that agreement- how the product is going to be used, what are the microbiological requirements that were stated on the specification, will there be any testing of the ingredient was going - because as in this case, this can affect the sales of a lot of other product sold to other customers. And if these customers made product, then we can expect cascading recalls to occur.
It is a dog-eat-dog...scratch that....a dog-eat-human food world...
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm593835.htm
National Frozen Foods Corporation Recalls Frozen Green Beans and Frozen Mixed Vegetables Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
January 24, 2018
It is a dog-eat-dog...scratch that....a dog-eat-human food world...
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm593835.htm
National Frozen Foods Corporation Recalls Frozen Green Beans and Frozen Mixed Vegetables Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
January 24, 2018
Friday, January 19, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Product - Week Ending 1/20/17
Misprinting of Label Leaves Off Milk - Ottogi America, Inc. of Gardena, CA is recalling 6.40 ounce “Rice cake soup” food, because it may contain undeclared milk. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that the milk-containing product was distributed in packaging that did not reveal the presence of milk. Subsequent investigation indicates the problem was caused by a misprinting in the company's packaging processes.
Chicken Salad with Wrong Lid - Duke Sandwich Productions, Inc., an Easley, S.C. establishment, is recalling approximately 743 pounds of chicken salad products due to misbranding - the products were packaged with two different product names. The chicken salad was packaged in the pimento cheese container, but it had “Chicken Salad” listed on the lid. The problem was discovered on Jan. 16, 2018, after the firm received a complaint from a retail store manager.
Chicken Salad with Wrong Label Café Spice GCT Inc., a New Windsor, N.Y. establishment, is recalling approximately 289 pounds of chicken salad products due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen, - the chicken salad was packaged with a chicken wrap label. The chicken salad contains milk, a known allergen, which is not declared on the chicken wraps’ product labels. The problem was discovered by a retail customer, who then notified the company. Following the company’s internal investigation, they contacted FSIS.
Almond Flour In Cheesecake Due to Supplier Error - Nine Whole Foods Market stores in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island are voluntarily recalling cheesecake bars because the product potentially contained a tree nut allergen (almond flour) that was not listed on the product label. The issue was discovered by Whole Foods Market after the incorrect product was shipped by the supplier to the distributor.
Inadequate Line Cleaning - Palmer Candy Company (www.palmercandy.com), is recalling Sea Salt Caramel Hearts (that were only sold at one store in the Midwest States) due to possible peanut allergen contamination. "The issue was discovered by Palmer Candy Team Members. During the packing process a peanut was observed stuck to the outside of the Sea Salt Caramel Heart." This may indicate that the processing line was inadequately cleaned after a peanut production run.
Wrong Package Label - Bellisio Foods, Inc., a Jackson, Ohio, manufacturer, is voluntarily recalling certain Michelina’s Fettuccine Alfredo due to the possibility some packages may contain undeclared chicken with soy that is not listed on packaging. This recall was issued on 12/22/17, but FDA issued this report this week. While details are limited, one would guess this was a packaging error when the Alfredo was placed on a chicken and soy containing product.
Chicken Salad with Wrong Lid - Duke Sandwich Productions, Inc., an Easley, S.C. establishment, is recalling approximately 743 pounds of chicken salad products due to misbranding - the products were packaged with two different product names. The chicken salad was packaged in the pimento cheese container, but it had “Chicken Salad” listed on the lid. The problem was discovered on Jan. 16, 2018, after the firm received a complaint from a retail store manager.
Chicken Salad with Wrong Label Café Spice GCT Inc., a New Windsor, N.Y. establishment, is recalling approximately 289 pounds of chicken salad products due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen, - the chicken salad was packaged with a chicken wrap label. The chicken salad contains milk, a known allergen, which is not declared on the chicken wraps’ product labels. The problem was discovered by a retail customer, who then notified the company. Following the company’s internal investigation, they contacted FSIS.
Almond Flour In Cheesecake Due to Supplier Error - Nine Whole Foods Market stores in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island are voluntarily recalling cheesecake bars because the product potentially contained a tree nut allergen (almond flour) that was not listed on the product label. The issue was discovered by Whole Foods Market after the incorrect product was shipped by the supplier to the distributor.
Inadequate Line Cleaning - Palmer Candy Company (www.palmercandy.com), is recalling Sea Salt Caramel Hearts (that were only sold at one store in the Midwest States) due to possible peanut allergen contamination. "The issue was discovered by Palmer Candy Team Members. During the packing process a peanut was observed stuck to the outside of the Sea Salt Caramel Heart." This may indicate that the processing line was inadequately cleaned after a peanut production run.
Wrong Package Label - Bellisio Foods, Inc., a Jackson, Ohio, manufacturer, is voluntarily recalling certain Michelina’s Fettuccine Alfredo due to the possibility some packages may contain undeclared chicken with soy that is not listed on packaging. This recall was issued on 12/22/17, but FDA issued this report this week. While details are limited, one would guess this was a packaging error when the Alfredo was placed on a chicken and soy containing product.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm592996.htm
Ottogi America, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Milk in Rice Cake Soup
For Immediate Release
January 19, 2018
Salmonella Outbreak Linked to Sprouts Sold at Sub Shop Chain
A Salmonella outbreak is being linked to raw sprouts sold at Jimmy John's in Illinois. The State Health Department has requested that the sub shop chain remove sprouts from the menu. Sprouts have been implicated in a number of outbreaks, including sprouts sold at Jimmy John's (2012).
The Packer
The Packer
https://www.thepacker.com/article/salmonella-infections-linked-sprouts-jimmy-johns
Salmonella infections linked to sprouts from Jimmy John’s
Ashley Nickle
January 19, 2018 02:26 PM
New Development to Modify Stainless Steel to Prevent Bacterial Growth
A new process was developed in which stainless steel can be modified to prevent the growth of bacteria. This is an interesting new development for application to the medical field. Is it something that can be applied to food operations?
Technology Networks.com
https://www.technologynetworks.com/applied-sciences/news/stainless-steel-that-is-more-resistant-to-bacteria-296387
Stainless Steel That Is More Resistant to Bacteria
News Jan 17, 2018 | Original Story from the University of Montreal.
Technology Networks.com
https://www.technologynetworks.com/applied-sciences/news/stainless-steel-that-is-more-resistant-to-bacteria-296387
Stainless Steel That Is More Resistant to Bacteria
News Jan 17, 2018 | Original Story from the University of Montreal.
Thursday, January 18, 2018
CDC MMWR Report - 2017 Legionella Outbreak Associated with Memphis Hotel Hot Tub
In the January 19th MMWR release, an investigative report into a 2017 Legionella outbreak associated with a hotel hot tub and pool. While the outbreak came to light because of a few cases, many more were found through old-fashioned investigative work rather than sample analysis.
Initially 3 cases were identified, and this led them to the hot tub. Through proceeding to survey past guest, 92 cases were identified, including nine laboratory-confirmed (urinary antigen positive) cases, 19 probable (self-reported pneumonia) cases, and 64 suspected (self-reported fever and ≥1 compatible symptom*) cases. Of these, 70 had required medical care, and 16 people were hospitalized and there was one reported death.
Not the way to meet up with Elvis after going into a Memphis hotel hot tub, or any hotel water for that matter. But how do you know? In this case, "environmental health specialists conducted an assessment of the hotel aquatics facility and identified improper water treatment monitoring and low chlorine residuals (0 ppm; acceptable range = 1–3 ppm)." "Laboratory testing of the aquatics facility water samples identified three Legionella polymerase chain reaction–positive samples from the pool, pool sand filter, and hot tub sand filter, and isolated Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 from the hot tub sand filter." Something to be said about that smell of chlorine when poolside.
CDC MMWR
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6702a5.htm?s_cid=mm6702a5_e
Notes from the Field: Legionellosis Outbreak Associated with a Hotel Aquatics Facility — Tennessee, 2017
Not the way to meet up with Elvis after going into a Memphis hotel hot tub, or any hotel water for that matter. But how do you know? In this case, "environmental health specialists conducted an assessment of the hotel aquatics facility and identified improper water treatment monitoring and low chlorine residuals (0 ppm; acceptable range = 1–3 ppm)." "Laboratory testing of the aquatics facility water samples identified three Legionella polymerase chain reaction–positive samples from the pool, pool sand filter, and hot tub sand filter, and isolated Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 from the hot tub sand filter." Something to be said about that smell of chlorine when poolside.
CDC MMWR
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6702a5.htm?s_cid=mm6702a5_e
Notes from the Field: Legionellosis Outbreak Associated with a Hotel Aquatics Facility — Tennessee, 2017
FDA to Expedite Recall Postings by Eliminating the Need to Have Classification Status at Time of Posting
FDA released a statement on its plan to expedite the recall postings / alerts to consumer. The plan to remove the need for the 'recall classification' at the time of posting. Normally, "only recalls that have already been classified into one of three categories based on the severity of the hazard have been listed in the report". And, these "recall classifications can sometimes take weeks – or even months when FDA needs to conduct a complex evaluation."
Wow, that was the hold up. I bet most could probably predict what the classification is just by reading the notice. For others, it probably doesn't even matter. But for FDA, determining whether a recall is Class I, II or III can be a lengthy process. "Such analysis can involve determining whether any diseases or injuries have already occurred, the likelihood that a hazard might occur, or whether vulnerable segments of the population, such as children, are more at risk"
Through some process improvement determination, "FDA has decided that the public would benefit by having recall information about FDA-regulated products as soon as possible, even though further evaluation remains to be done. Moving forward, FDA will include “not-yet-classified” recalls of human drugs, foods, and veterinary products in the weekly Enforcement Report, even while classification work is still ongoing."
FDA Voice
https://blogs.fda.gov/fdavoice/index.php/2018/01/fda-to-expedite-release-of-recall-information
FDA Voice
https://blogs.fda.gov/fdavoice/index.php/2018/01/fda-to-expedite-release-of-recall-information
FDA to Expedite Release of Recall Information
Posted on January 18, 2018 by FDA Voice
Posted on January 18, 2018 by FDA Voice
France - Investigation Deepens Regarding French Infant Milk Contaminated with Salmonella
Investigators are searching French dairy Lactalis for information related to Salmonella outbreak linked to their infant milk. More than 12 million boxes have been recalled in 83 different countries. "At least 37 babies are so far reported to have been affected in France, with one case reported in Spain and a further unconfirmed case in Greece."
Reports were also released that the French grocery stores still continued to sell the recalled product.
"This is a major dysfunction in the withdrawal and recall by the operators, who bear responsibility," Agriculture Minister Stephane Travert told reporters.
BBC News
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42715187
France's baby milk scare: Police search Lactalis sites
17 January 2018
"This is a major dysfunction in the withdrawal and recall by the operators, who bear responsibility," Agriculture Minister Stephane Travert told reporters.
BBC News
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-42715187
France's baby milk scare: Police search Lactalis sites
17 January 2018
Monday, January 15, 2018
CDC and FDA Hold Off from Implicating Romaine Lettuce in E. coli Outbreak
FDA and CDC did not pull the trigger on making a public notice to avoid romaine lettuce for involvement in an E. coli outbreak. The Canadians were first to issue a public notice implicating Romaine lettuce on Dec 14th. At this point, however, there were no additional cases of E. coli infection reported with the last case on December 12th being reported (and recognizing there is a delay from infection and reporting).
In the end, that call was right. Even if it is found that romaine lettuce was the source, that contaminated product would had already been through the system (considering the short shelf-life of product). A public notice would have been missed the target and resulted in needless waste.
However, what we did see was a lot of confusion on the part of various entities issuing reactionary notices. FDA and CDC would have done better to put their findings out there earlier. Outbreak investigations are not perfect, and while it would have been easier on their part to trash the leafy green industry, relaying the findings would have gone a long way to quieting the alarmists.
https://www.fda.gov/Food/RecallsOutbreaksEmergencies/SafetyAlertsAdvisories/ucm591989.htm
FDA Information about E. coli O157:H7 Outbreak Likely Linked to Leafy Greens
January 10, 2018
https://www.fda.gov/Food/RecallsOutbreaksEmergencies/SafetyAlertsAdvisories/ucm591989.htm
FDA Information about E. coli O157:H7 Outbreak Likely Linked to Leafy Greens
January 10, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Product - Ending Jan 13, 2018
Juice Products May Contain Milk Protein - Hiland Dairy is announcing a voluntary recall of two products produced at the Omaha, Nebraska facility, over concerns the products may contain milk protein that could affect those individuals that have sensitivity to milk allergens. Hiland Dairy initially learned of a potential issue during internal quality control testing at the Omaha facility.
Tofu Product Does Not Declare Soy on Label - Rico Brand of Salt Lake City, Utah is recalling Tofu Breakfast Burrito, because it may contain undeclared Soy [And tofu is fermented soy, so must realize that some consumers may not recognize that fact?]. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that the product “Tofu Breakfast Burrito” containing Soybean was distributed in packaging that did not reveal the presence of Soybean. Subsequent investigation indicates the problem was caused by a temporary breakdown in the company's packaging processes.
Supplier Mistakenly Labels Coconut Macaroons as Oatmeal Cookies - Dollar General Corporation announced a voluntary recall of a lot of its 12-ounce packages of Clover Valley® Iced Oatmeal Cookies over concerns of undeclared milk and tree nuts. Dollar General initially learned of a potential issue based upon information received from a store level employee. The Company promptly contacted the product’s manufacturer who confirmed a production facility labeling error in which Clover Valley® Coconut Macaroons were inadvertently placed in Clover Valley® Iced Oatmeal Cookie packaging.
Hiland Dairy Announces Voluntary Recall Of Hiland Dairy Orange Juice And Tampico Citrus Punch
For Immediate Release
January 13, 2018
Tofu Product Does Not Declare Soy on Label - Rico Brand of Salt Lake City, Utah is recalling Tofu Breakfast Burrito, because it may contain undeclared Soy [And tofu is fermented soy, so must realize that some consumers may not recognize that fact?]. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that the product “Tofu Breakfast Burrito” containing Soybean was distributed in packaging that did not reveal the presence of Soybean. Subsequent investigation indicates the problem was caused by a temporary breakdown in the company's packaging processes.
Supplier Mistakenly Labels Coconut Macaroons as Oatmeal Cookies - Dollar General Corporation announced a voluntary recall of a lot of its 12-ounce packages of Clover Valley® Iced Oatmeal Cookies over concerns of undeclared milk and tree nuts. Dollar General initially learned of a potential issue based upon information received from a store level employee. The Company promptly contacted the product’s manufacturer who confirmed a production facility labeling error in which Clover Valley® Coconut Macaroons were inadvertently placed in Clover Valley® Iced Oatmeal Cookie packaging.
Hiland Dairy Announces Voluntary Recall Of Hiland Dairy Orange Juice And Tampico Citrus Punch
For Immediate Release
January 13, 2018
Frozen Novelty Recall Expanded and Revised
A recall of frozen orange cream bars initially posted on 1/5/18 has been expanded on 1/9/18 and then clarified on 1/11/18 to include all //product produced on one production line at one of the company's facility due to the potential for Listeria contamination. The recall now includes chocolate covered vanilla bars in addition to the orange cream bars, as well as raspberry cream bars sold in split cases. The recall covers close to 30 different brands.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm592326.htm
Fieldbrook Foods Corporation Clarifies Scope of its Voluntary Recall. Products Include Orange Cream
For Immediate Release
January 11, 2018
"The potential for contamination was noted after routine industry testing revealed the presence of Listeria monocytogenes in only a few ice cream bar samples of many tested. The expansion of the recall is out of precaution for consumer health and food safety after a few additional samples tested positive for the presence of Listeria monocytogenes. There is no evidence of any contamination prior to October 31, 2017, but the company has issued the recall back to January 1, 2017 through an abundance of caution and in full cooperation with the FDA."The Recall Notice goes on to state:
"The company has suspended production and distribution of all products produced on this production line while it cooperates with the FDA to fully investigate the source of the problem."Which would indicate that they do not yet know what the problem was...and being they don't know the source, the recall was expanded.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm592326.htm
Fieldbrook Foods Corporation Clarifies Scope of its Voluntary Recall. Products Include Orange Cream
For Immediate Release
January 11, 2018
Wednesday, January 10, 2018
Sushi Recalled by Grocery Chain After Supplier has Potential Listeria Contamination Issues
Price Chopper, a northeast-based supermarket chain is recalling sushi product produced by AFC Franchise Corp due to the potential to be contaminated by Listeria. There was no information on which item was involved, but being that two stores from different states had suspect product, it is more likely an ingredient issue than a store issue.
AFC franchises sushi bars that are often located in supermarkets. AFC provides the know-how and materials to allow a franchisee to operate a sales space in a grocery store. AFC had a recall early this past year for packages of edamame due to Listeria.
AFC franchises sushi bars that are often located in supermarkets. AFC provides the know-how and materials to allow a franchisee to operate a sales space in a grocery store. AFC had a recall early this past year for packages of edamame due to Listeria.
Many of the ingredients used in making sushi have the sufficient nutrients and are stored under conditions that allow the growth of Listeria. Once the product is made and packaged in the store, there is always the risk of consumer mishandling, in this case, storing at elevated temperatures. This would exacerbate the situation by allowing more growth.
WBNG.com
http://www.wbng.com/story/37228295/price-chopper-recalls-packaged-sushi-made-with-tuna
Price Chopper recalls packaged sushi made with tuna
By David Hermanovitch
Posted: Jan 09, 2018
WBNG.com
http://www.wbng.com/story/37228295/price-chopper-recalls-packaged-sushi-made-with-tuna
Price Chopper recalls packaged sushi made with tuna
By David Hermanovitch
Posted: Jan 09, 2018
Monday, January 8, 2018
New Trend - Drinking 'Raw Water'
There is a new trend...'raw water'...water that is unfiltered, untreated spring water. A article in the New York Times, Unfiltered Fervor: The Rush to Get Off the Water Grid discusses a Oregon operation, Live Water, is selling water for $14.99/bottle refill while a San Diego operation sells their version for $2.50/gallon.
National Review
‘Raw Water’ Makes a Mockery of Human Suffering
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455235/raw-water-movement-mocks-human-suffering
by Jibran Khan January 8, 2018 1:05 PM
It’s a play-act of poverty that puts ‘slum tourism’ to shame. Every few months, there’s a new trend that promises life-changing health benefits — a spice, or a juice, or another mundane consumable, often with an Indian or East Asian name thrown in to make it seem ancient and exotic. We see these things, laugh, and move on with our lives. We live and let live.
"The quest for pure water is hardly new; people have been drinking from natural springs and collecting rainwater from time immemorial. The crusade against adding fluoride to public water began in the 1950s among Americans who saw danger in the protective measures that had been adopted over decades to protect the populace from disease and contamination. But the off-grid water movement has become more than the fringe phenomenon it once was, with sophisticated marketing, cultural cachet, millions of dollars in funding and influential supporters from Silicon Valley."
One can also purchase water collection systems that capture moisture from the air.
From a safety perspective, without treating water, one opens themselves to increased risk to a host of microbial pathogens including bacteria and parasites such as Giardia and Cryptosporidium, . Beyond that, people across globe do not have access to clean water and would prefer avoid drinking 'raw' water. The article below, from National Review, sums that up pretty well.
National Review
‘Raw Water’ Makes a Mockery of Human Suffering
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/455235/raw-water-movement-mocks-human-suffering
by Jibran Khan January 8, 2018 1:05 PM
It’s a play-act of poverty that puts ‘slum tourism’ to shame. Every few months, there’s a new trend that promises life-changing health benefits — a spice, or a juice, or another mundane consumable, often with an Indian or East Asian name thrown in to make it seem ancient and exotic. We see these things, laugh, and move on with our lives. We live and let live.
Orange Cream Bars Recalled After Lot Tests Positive for Listeria
A NY firm is recalling 340 cases of orange cream bars due to potential contamination with Listeria monocytogenes. This comes after the company's routine testing revealed the presence of Listeria monocytogenes in another production lot that had been fully contained.
Unfortunately, in these cases where Listeria is found in product, the recall often is expanded unless the company can clearly demonstrate that Listeria control had been maintained over time with some plausible exception for the lot that tested positive.
FDA Recall Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm591580.htm
Fieldbrook Foods Corporation, Announces a Voluntary Recall of Orange Cream Bars for Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
January 5, 2018
Unfortunately, in these cases where Listeria is found in product, the recall often is expanded unless the company can clearly demonstrate that Listeria control had been maintained over time with some plausible exception for the lot that tested positive.
FDA Recall Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm591580.htm
Fieldbrook Foods Corporation, Announces a Voluntary Recall of Orange Cream Bars for Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
January 5, 2018
Friday, January 5, 2018
FDA Recalls Too Slow? Is Romaine Lettuce the Source of an E. coli Outbreak? A Food Safety Vortex
Last week, the US Inspector General issued a report that criticized the FDA for not moving quickly enough to recall foods. At the same time, an E. coli outbreak has caused illness in 17 people in the US. While Canada has identified romaine lettuce as the causative agent in E. coli cases that occurred there, the CDC and FDA have not followed the Canadians in blaming romaine lettuce. Of course, the US agencies have been criticized for this and Consumer Reports has issued a news release stating the consumers avoid romaine lettuce for now.
As romaine lettuce is being pulled from the store shelves (which, if considering the short shelf-life and the time frame of the outbreak, will not amount to much), we look back at the 2008 Salmonella outbreak where tomatoes were falsely accused, and can see why the federal agencies are acting in a judicious manner. I guess we don't expect the federal agencies to have the correct answer immediately, especially considering the tediousness of conducting an outbreak investigation, but I do agree with others saying that the agencies should be providing more information about that investigation. Not only will it let people decide for themselves (rather than having the Canadians decide for us), but will help inform all of us of the difficulties that are entailed in an outbreak investigation.
For the consumer, there is a lot of confusion. If you have romaine lettuce in your refrigerator, do you return it?
USA Today
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/01/02/fda-food-recalls-still-too-slow-editorials-debates/993481001/
Why is FDA so slow on food recalls?
The Editorial Board, USA TODAY
Published 5:54 p.m. ET Jan. 2, 2018 | Updated 6:59 p.m. ET Jan. 2, 2018
As romaine lettuce is being pulled from the store shelves (which, if considering the short shelf-life and the time frame of the outbreak, will not amount to much), we look back at the 2008 Salmonella outbreak where tomatoes were falsely accused, and can see why the federal agencies are acting in a judicious manner. I guess we don't expect the federal agencies to have the correct answer immediately, especially considering the tediousness of conducting an outbreak investigation, but I do agree with others saying that the agencies should be providing more information about that investigation. Not only will it let people decide for themselves (rather than having the Canadians decide for us), but will help inform all of us of the difficulties that are entailed in an outbreak investigation.
For the consumer, there is a lot of confusion. If you have romaine lettuce in your refrigerator, do you return it?
USA Today
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/01/02/fda-food-recalls-still-too-slow-editorials-debates/993481001/
Why is FDA so slow on food recalls?
The Editorial Board, USA TODAY
Published 5:54 p.m. ET Jan. 2, 2018 | Updated 6:59 p.m. ET Jan. 2, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Product for Week Ending 1/5/18
Ice Bars Recalled After Reported Complaint for Allergic Reaction - California Popsicle, Inc. dba Polly Ann Ice Cream of South San Francisco, CA is recalling ice bars, because it may contain undeclared milk. The recall was initiated after notification by FDA of a consumer complaint in Canada.
Instant Coffee Mix Missing Milk on Label - Hong Lee Trading Inc., NY, is recalling its CHAO CAFÉ VIETNAMESE INSTANT COFFEE MIXED 3 IN 1, 384 GRAM, CONTAINER CODE JUNE 06 2018, because they contain undeclared milk allergens. The recall was initiated after routine sampling by New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Food Inspectors and subsequent analysis by Food Laboratory personnel revealed the presence of milk allergens in the packages [of product] which did not declare a milk ingredient on the label.
Veggie Cups labeled as Fruit Cups - Condies Foods of Kearns, UT is recalling 166 cases of veggies cups because they were labeled as fruit cups. The veggie cups had dressing which was not on the fruit cup label so there is a possibility that this may contain undeclared milk and egg allergens. After getting an initial complaint from a customer about the label not matching the description of the product, after seeing the pictures from the email it was decided to initiate a voluntary recall to ensure that our public would not get further exposure to an erroneous product.
Eggs Left Off Label - New Seasons Market has initiated a voluntary recall of its New Seasons Market Grab and Go pre-packaged Macaroni and Cheese because it may contain undeclared egg. An employee noticed the mislabeled packages during a routine stock rotation check. New Seasons Market Macaroni and Cheese normally contains eggs, but eggs were accidentally left off the ingredients list and the “contains” allergens statement on the label.
Milk Not Declared on Label - Daisy’s Bakery Inc. of Clifton, New Jersey is recalling 4 ounce packages of Gourmet Concha, because it may contain undeclared milk. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that the milk containing product was distributed with a label that did not reveal the presence of milk. Subsequent investigation indicates the problem was caused by a temporary breakdown in the company’s production and packaging processes.
Soy Found In Product - PFP Enterprises LLC, also doing business as Texas Meat Packers, a Fort Worth, Texas establishment, is recalling approximately 7,570 pounds of ground beef products due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen, soy, which is not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered when FSIS received a complaint from a school about the product’s packaging. FSIS laboratory testing confirmed that the product contained soy and added water.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm591278.htm
California Popsicle, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Milk in Ice Bars
For Immediate Release
January 3, 2018
Contact
Consumers 650-745-809
Instant Coffee Mix Missing Milk on Label - Hong Lee Trading Inc., NY, is recalling its CHAO CAFÉ VIETNAMESE INSTANT COFFEE MIXED 3 IN 1, 384 GRAM, CONTAINER CODE JUNE 06 2018, because they contain undeclared milk allergens. The recall was initiated after routine sampling by New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Food Inspectors and subsequent analysis by Food Laboratory personnel revealed the presence of milk allergens in the packages [of product] which did not declare a milk ingredient on the label.
Veggie Cups labeled as Fruit Cups - Condies Foods of Kearns, UT is recalling 166 cases of veggies cups because they were labeled as fruit cups. The veggie cups had dressing which was not on the fruit cup label so there is a possibility that this may contain undeclared milk and egg allergens. After getting an initial complaint from a customer about the label not matching the description of the product, after seeing the pictures from the email it was decided to initiate a voluntary recall to ensure that our public would not get further exposure to an erroneous product.
Eggs Left Off Label - New Seasons Market has initiated a voluntary recall of its New Seasons Market Grab and Go pre-packaged Macaroni and Cheese because it may contain undeclared egg. An employee noticed the mislabeled packages during a routine stock rotation check. New Seasons Market Macaroni and Cheese normally contains eggs, but eggs were accidentally left off the ingredients list and the “contains” allergens statement on the label.
Milk Not Declared on Label - Daisy’s Bakery Inc. of Clifton, New Jersey is recalling 4 ounce packages of Gourmet Concha, because it may contain undeclared milk. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that the milk containing product was distributed with a label that did not reveal the presence of milk. Subsequent investigation indicates the problem was caused by a temporary breakdown in the company’s production and packaging processes.
Soy Found In Product - PFP Enterprises LLC, also doing business as Texas Meat Packers, a Fort Worth, Texas establishment, is recalling approximately 7,570 pounds of ground beef products due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen, soy, which is not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered when FSIS received a complaint from a school about the product’s packaging. FSIS laboratory testing confirmed that the product contained soy and added water.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm591278.htm
California Popsicle, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Milk in Ice Bars
For Immediate Release
January 3, 2018
Contact
Consumers 650-745-809
Recall Issued for Shredded Coconut After State Lab Test Positive for Salmonella
Evershing International Trading Company is recalling 16 ounces Coconut Tree Brand Frozen Shredded Coconut because they have the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella. The issue was discovered by testing performed by the State of Massachusetts.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm591335.htm
Evershing International Trading Company Recalls Frozen Shredded Coconut Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
January 3, 2018
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm591335.htm
Evershing International Trading Company Recalls Frozen Shredded Coconut Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
January 3, 2018
Washington Establishment Recalls Pepperoni After Receiving Metal Complaints
A Washington establishment is recalling over 4000 pounds of pepperoni sticks products after receiving 3 consumer complaints for extraneous material, specifically small metal pieces. There have been no "confirmed" reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products.
USDA Recall Notice
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-001-2018-release
Hempler Foods Group, LLC Recalls Pepperoni Products due to Possible Extraneous Material Contamination
Class I Recall
001-2018
Health Risk: High
Jan 4, 2018
USDA Recall Notice
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-001-2018-release
Hempler Foods Group, LLC Recalls Pepperoni Products due to Possible Extraneous Material Contamination
Class I Recall
001-2018
Health Risk: High
Jan 4, 2018
Tuesday, January 2, 2018
Recall Issued after Supermarket Chain Identifies Foreign Material in Beef Stew Product
Swift Beef Co., doing business as JBS USA Food Company, a Cactus, Texas establishment, is recalling approximately 4,702 pounds of beef stew product that may be contaminated with foreign matter , specifically plastic and metal. The problem was discovered on Dec. 24, 2017, by the HEB grocery store chain in San Antonio, Texas, when they opened boxes containing the multi-vac packages. That same day HEB locked the sales of all stew meat from their registers and pulled all products from shelves in all the stores.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2017/recall-131-2017-release
Swift Beef Company Recalls Beef Stew Products Due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class I Recall
131-2017
Health Risk: High
Dec 26, 2017
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2017/recall-131-2017-release
Swift Beef Company Recalls Beef Stew Products Due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class I Recall
131-2017
Health Risk: High
Dec 26, 2017
E. coli (STEC) Outbreak in US and Canada Under Investigation
CDC, several states, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration are investigating a multistate outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli O157:H7 infections where 17 people have become ill in 13 states. A possible link may exist to an outbreak in Canada. While the Canadian Public Health Agency has identified romaine lettuce as the source of the outbreak in Canada, no particular product has been identified in the U..
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/s1228-e-coli-outbreak.html
CDC Investigating Multistate Outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 Infections
For Immediate Release: Thursday, December 28, 2017
Contact: Media Relations
(404) 639-3286
https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2017/s1228-e-coli-outbreak.html
CDC Investigating Multistate Outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 Infections
For Immediate Release: Thursday, December 28, 2017
Contact: Media Relations
(404) 639-3286
Ohio Company Issues Recall for Biscuits Due to the Potential for Listeria Contamination
An Ohio company, T. Marzetti Company, is recalling biscuit products for potential Listeria contamination. The products were sold under various store brands includign Food Lion, Piggly Wiggly, and Shur Fine, and were distributed in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia. According to one report, there may have been a contamination issue at one of the T. Marzetti Company plants.
FDA Recall Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm590976.htm
T. Marzetti Company Voluntarily Recalls Frozen Biscuit Dough Packed Under Various Brands Due to Potential Listeria Contamination
For Immediate Release
December 29, 2017
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm590976.htm
T. Marzetti Company Voluntarily Recalls Frozen Biscuit Dough Packed Under Various Brands Due to Potential Listeria Contamination
For Immediate Release
December 29, 2017
FDA Issues Summary of Inspection Items Listed on 483 Reports Issued in FY2017
FDA posted the summary of inspectional observation items listed on 483 reports from FY 2017 (10/2016 to 9/2017). During an inspection, ORA investigators may observe conditions they deem to be objectionable. These observations, are listed on an FDA Form 483 when, in an investigator’s judgment, the observed conditions or practices indicate that an FDA-regulated product may be in violation of FDA’s requirements. "These spreadsheets are not a comprehensive listing of all inspectional observations but represent the area of regulation and the number of times it was cited as an observation on an FDA Form 483 during inspections conducted by FDA and its representatives."
According to the posting, there were 2662 483's issued during FY 2017, compared to 2196 in 2016. While the top 5 are similar to those listed in 2016, and most issues involve pest control, sanitation, processing concerns, and building structure issues, there is a new item which is the Failure to Develop a FSVP (Foreign Supplier Verification Program). The FSVP is for controlling foreign suppliers when a company not operating under Preventive Controls is importing the food.
According to the posting, there were 2662 483's issued during FY 2017, compared to 2196 in 2016. While the top 5 are similar to those listed in 2016, and most issues involve pest control, sanitation, processing concerns, and building structure issues, there is a new item which is the Failure to Develop a FSVP (Foreign Supplier Verification Program). The FSVP is for controlling foreign suppliers when a company not operating under Preventive Controls is importing the food.
Sliced Apples Recalled After Supplier Issued Recall of Whole Apples for Potential Listeria
Two companies are recalling sliced apple products after their supplier, Jack Brown Produce recalled whole apples for Listeria.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm590372.htm
Fresh Pak Inc. Recalls Lot Specific Sliced Apple Products Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
December 22, 2017
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm590372.htm
Fresh Pak Inc. Recalls Lot Specific Sliced Apple Products Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
December 22, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)