The cascade of recalls continues...for Listeria in frozen produce, for Listeria in sunflower seeds, and Listeria in Walnuts.
LISTERIA IN FROZEN PRODUCE
Updated: Ajinomoto Windsor Recall of Products Related to CRF Frozen Vegetable Recallhttp://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm499858.htm
Ajinomoto Windsor, Inc. is voluntarily recalling various Not-Ready-To Eat frozen food items due to the potential for these products to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. This voluntary action is being undertaken in cooperation with the US Food and Drug Administration because the recalled products contain vegetables that are part of the recent CRF Frozen Foods recall.
Updated: Stahlbush Island Farms, Inc. Recalls IQF Green Beans Because of Possible Health Riskhttp://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm499775.htm
Stahlbush Island Farms, Inc. (SIFI) of Corvallis, Ore., is voluntarily recalling 10 oz. Stahlbush® IQF Green Bean retail packages because it has the potential to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes
Hy-Vee Voluntarily Recalls Frozen Hy-Vee Vegetable Fried Rice and Frozen Hy-Vee Chicken Fried Rice Due to Possible Health Risk
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm501017.htm
Hy-Vee, Inc., based in West Des Moines, Iowa, is voluntarily recalling its frozen Hy-Vee Vegetable Fried Rice and frozen Hy-Vee Chicken Fried Rice products across its eight-state region due to possible contamination with Listeria monocytogenes.
The potential for contamination was discovered after Ajinomoto Windsor, Hy-Vee’s supplier, announced they were recalling specific frozen foods due to the potential for Listeria monocytogenes.
Dr. Praeger's Sensible Foods, Inc. Announces Voluntary Recall of Various Dr. Praeger's and Ungar's Products Related to CRF Frozen Vegetable Recall for Possible Health Risk
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm501243.htm
Dr. Praeger’s Sensible Foods, Inc. is voluntarily recalling various not-ready-to-eat frozen food items due to the potential for these products to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. This voluntary action is being undertaken in cooperation with the US Food and Drug Administration because the recalled products contain vegetables that are part of the recent CRF Frozen Foods recall.
Voluntary Recall on Piggly Wiggly Brand Yellow Cut Corn
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm500859.htm
As part of the CRF Frozen Foods recall, McCall Farms Incorporated is notifying consumers that it is recalling Piggly Wiggly brand frozen Yellow Cut Corn due to the potential risk that it may contain Listeria monocytogenes. McCall Farms was notified by its supplier, CRF Frozen Foods, of this potential contamination. No other McCall Farms products have been affected by this recall.
LISTERIA IN WALNUTS
HMSHost Recalls Multiple Brands of Cape Cod Cranberry Trail Mix Because of Possible Health Riskhttp://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm501041.htm
HMSHost of Bethesda, Maryland is recalling multiple brands of trail mix, because they have the potential to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. HMSHost was recently notified by one of its snack manufacturers, Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, that during their routine testing, the presence of Listeria monocytogenes was revealed in two lots of walnuts used in one of its trail mixes
LISTERIA IN SUNFLOWER SEEDS
The Quaker Oats Company Issues Voluntary Recall of Quaker Quinoa Granola Bars Due to Possible Health Risk
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm501248.htm
The Quaker Oats Company, a subsidiary of PepsiCo, Inc., today announced a voluntary recall of a small quantity of Quaker Quinoa Granola Bars after an ingredient supplier was found to have distributed sunflower kernels that may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes (L.mono).
Wednesday, May 18, 2016
National Academy of Science Finds GMOs Generally Safe
GMO or Genetically Modified Foods....a very controversial topic. Well, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine concluded that this food is generally safe. In their report "no substantiated evidence that foods from GE [genetically engineered] crops were less safe than foods from non-GE crops,". Still, they are not the panacea.
Even the Center for Science in Public Interest (CSPI) was not overly hostile to the this announcement, and posted this:
As for me, I am old fashion and feel that one shouldn't fool with Mother Nature too much. Selective breeding is one thing, but insertion of genes into other species that we are going to eat, that is another thing.
"Feed me.."
CBS/AP
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/genetically-modified-foods-are-safe-to-eat-report-finds/
Major science group weighs in on safety of genetically modified foods
May 18, 2016, 11:58 AM
Even the Center for Science in Public Interest (CSPI) was not overly hostile to the this announcement, and posted this:
CSPI supports the report’s call for transparency and public participation in the oversight of GE crops and for the federal agencies to do more to communicate their regulatory decisions to the public. However, it is disappointing that the report does not recommend that FDA’s oversight change from a voluntary to a mandatory process. That would have been consistent with the report’s acknowledgement that federal oversight is important to ensure both safety and public confidence.
As for me, I am old fashion and feel that one shouldn't fool with Mother Nature too much. Selective breeding is one thing, but insertion of genes into other species that we are going to eat, that is another thing.
"Feed me.."
CBS/AP
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/genetically-modified-foods-are-safe-to-eat-report-finds/
Major science group weighs in on safety of genetically modified foods
May 18, 2016, 11:58 AM
Friday, May 13, 2016
FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Qualified Facilities within the Preventive Controls Rule
As part of the Preventive Controls Rule, FDA establishes 'Qualified Facilities' as those facilities exempt from having to establish HACCP based systems (Preventive Controls), but only having to comply with GMPs. But in order to become 'Qualified', they must submit a form to FDA attesting to their status as 'Qualified". This guidance provides detail on how to submit the required form, Form FDA 3942.
‘Qualified Facility’’ as defined by FSMA:
• Business with average annual sales of <$500,000 and at least half the sales to consumers or local retailers or restaurants (within the same state or within 275 miles); or.
• Very small business, which the rule defines as a business (including any subsidiaries and affiliates) averaging less than $1,000,000, adjusted for inflation, per year, during the 3-year period preceding the applicable calendar year in sales of human food plus the market value of human food manufactured, processed, packed, or held without sale (e.g., held for a fee).
‘Qualified Facility’’ as defined by FSMA:
• Business with average annual sales of <$500,000 and at least half the sales to consumers or local retailers or restaurants (within the same state or within 275 miles); or.
• Very small business, which the rule defines as a business (including any subsidiaries and affiliates) averaging less than $1,000,000, adjusted for inflation, per year, during the 3-year period preceding the applicable calendar year in sales of human food plus the market value of human food manufactured, processed, packed, or held without sale (e.g., held for a fee).
You can access that document here.
Kale Edamame Salad Recalled Due to Potential Salmonella Contamination in Kale
Trader Joe's is recalling Kale and Edamame Salad after the supplier of the kale notified the salad manufacturer, WCD Kitchens, that the kale may have Salmonella.
Retails such as Trader Joe's, who utilize a lot of small firms to provide their stores unique products seem to have more than their share of recalls. This is certainly the challenge of working with firms that may have supplier issues of their own.
Another issue here is testing of product with short shelf-life. By the time tests are taken and then confirmed, that product is already out in the market.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm500286.htm
World Class Distribution Issues Voluntary Recall on Kale & Edamame Salad Due to Possible Health Risk
May 10, 2016
Contact
Consumers WCD Kitchen, LLC (909) 574-4140
Retails such as Trader Joe's, who utilize a lot of small firms to provide their stores unique products seem to have more than their share of recalls. This is certainly the challenge of working with firms that may have supplier issues of their own.
Another issue here is testing of product with short shelf-life. By the time tests are taken and then confirmed, that product is already out in the market.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm500286.htm
World Class Distribution Issues Voluntary Recall on Kale & Edamame Salad Due to Possible Health Risk
May 10, 2016
Contact
Consumers WCD Kitchen, LLC (909) 574-4140
Media Paul Mestas (909) 574-4140
Announcement
View Product Photos
WCD Kitchen, LLC of Fontana, California is voluntarily recalling Trader Joe’s Kale & Edamame Salad (UPC 00967112), sold only in the Midwest, with a “USE BY May 05, 2016 through May 14, 2016”, because the product may be contaminated withSalmonella. No illnesses have been reported to date.
View Product Photos
WCD Kitchen, LLC of Fontana, California is voluntarily recalling Trader Joe’s Kale & Edamame Salad (UPC 00967112), sold only in the Midwest, with a “USE BY May 05, 2016 through May 14, 2016”, because the product may be contaminated withSalmonella. No illnesses have been reported to date.
Listeria Tracking and Whole Genome Sequencing - How Close is Close
As the CRF frozen produce recall has resulted in a cascade of recalls and millions of pounds of produce being pulled from shelves across the country, one can look at what triggered this - an Ohio Lab finding Listeria in frozen foods and an investigation of a frozen food plant that led to finding the organism in the plant.
According to CDC: Epidemiological and laboratory evidence available at this time indicates that frozen vegetables produced by CRF Frozen Foods of Pasco, Washington and sold under various brand names are one likely source of illnesses in this outbreak. This is a complex, ongoing investigation, and updates will be provided when more information is available.Further in that report
Whole genome sequencing showed that the Listeria isolate from the frozen corn was closely related genetically to seven bacterial isolates from ill people, and the Listeria isolate from the frozen peas was closely related genetically to one isolate from an ill person. This close genetic relationship provides additional evidence that some people in this outbreak became ill from eating frozen vegetables produced by CRF Frozen Foods.Whole genome sequencing has had a huge impact on outbreak investigations. It allows investigators to match the organism involved in an outbreak back to the organisms found in the plant. Using this output, one can look in time to past illness and do the same matching, what is termed retrospective analysis. But just because that organism is found in food or in the food plant, does that implicate that food? And how close is close when CDC says there is a close genetic relationship? We asked Dr. Edward Dudley of Penn State to provide some insight.
"A 5 base pair difference (or 5 SNPs) is strong evidence that the two are related. [Listeria has 3 million base pairs] Even within an outbreak, it isn’t unusual for clones to vary by a few SNPs. This is one of the reasons the FDA is sequencing large collections of food borne pathogens including Listeria, in order to get a handle on how much genetic variation exists in natural populations. As we collect more of this data, it will tell us how quickly the DNA of these pathogens change in foods, food processing environments or during an outbreak, informing us how many SNPs should be allowed for us to still make strong case that two isolates are related."
"Keep in mind though, that genome sequencing should not be used by itself to make any conclusions. We still need the epidemiological (epi) data that provides a statistical link between the patient and an event, for example "did patients with Listeria eat frozen vegetables more commonly than healthy individuals during the time frame of the outbreak?”. The genome sequencing of isolates obtained from patient and foods is used to support the conclusions of the epi investigation when isolates from linked sources are found to be highly related on the DNA level."
So in the end, old fashion epidemiological evidence is still needed. And there is still understanding is needed. As for produce, many of the companies forced into a recall are doing so without knowing if there is actually Listeria in their product and in the absence of illnesses associated with their product.
Thursday, May 12, 2016
Chipotle Retains Food Safety Gurus as Board Wants Ability to Pick Executive Board
Chipotle shareholders approved a proposal to give the chain's board approval to be able to nominate directors to the board. At the same time, the chain acknowledge that it had hired two additional food safety experts.
Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-chipotle-shareholders-idUSKCN0Y2049
Business | Wed May 11, 2016 6:22pm EDT
Chipotle shareholders vote for more power to pick board
LOS ANGELES | By Lisa Baertlein
Reuters
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-chipotle-shareholders-idUSKCN0Y2049
Business | Wed May 11, 2016 6:22pm EDT
Chipotle shareholders vote for more power to pick board
LOS ANGELES | By Lisa Baertlein
CRF Recall Triggers Recalls by Additional Processors and Retailers
A number of other packers of frozen foods issued recalls after an ingredient supplier, CRF issued a recall last week. What started off as a massive recall continues to get bigger as product produced by CRF was repacked by other frozen food companies.
The list below in includes recalls from Stahlbush Island Farms, Harris Teeter, Twin Cities, Pictsweet, and NORPAC.
The list below in includes recalls from Stahlbush Island Farms, Harris Teeter, Twin Cities, Pictsweet, and NORPAC.
Wednesday, May 11, 2016
Walnuts Recalled Due to Listeria
A Woodstock, NJ company is recalling various Walnut products purchased from Gibson Farms after a sample of that product tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes. This comes after another recall last week for sunflower seeds, although there does not appear to be any real connection.
Makes you wonder whether people will start testing the heck out of nut products for Listeria? These products, because of low moisture / water activity, will not support the growth of Listieria. And because they are produced in a dry environment, one would expect that environmental contamination would be minimal. That being said, one would expect levels to be very low.
The biggest risk for these nuts would be if they were added as an ingredient to a product that supported growth. And depending on the level, which would be expected to be very low, would only be a risk to those with a highly impaired immune system.
With two recalls, more research is needed to understand how Listeria is getting onto nuts, the levels present, and what real risk it poses.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm500345.htm
United Natural Trading LLC Announces Voluntary Recall of Walnuts
For Immediate Release
May 10, 2016
Makes you wonder whether people will start testing the heck out of nut products for Listeria? These products, because of low moisture / water activity, will not support the growth of Listieria. And because they are produced in a dry environment, one would expect that environmental contamination would be minimal. That being said, one would expect levels to be very low.
The biggest risk for these nuts would be if they were added as an ingredient to a product that supported growth. And depending on the level, which would be expected to be very low, would only be a risk to those with a highly impaired immune system.
With two recalls, more research is needed to understand how Listeria is getting onto nuts, the levels present, and what real risk it poses.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm500345.htm
United Natural Trading LLC Announces Voluntary Recall of Walnuts
For Immediate Release
May 10, 2016
Hoijicha Tea Recalled Due to Salmonella in Ingredient
Frontier Natural Product Co-op based in and a self proclaimed 'major supplier in the booming natural products industry', is recalling Organic Hojicha Tea due to potential to be contaminated with Salmonella. The recall indicates the recall was initiated after an ingredient tested positive for Salmonella. (While it seems the supplier did the testing, it is hard to determine from how the notice was written.)..
So what is Hojicha tea? Good question. Well, Hojicha tea is a roasted tea that is more mild and has less caffeine. The roasting process makes the tea leaves reddish in color and gives the tea a ' a toasty, slightly caramel-like flavor'. Because of the lower caffeine level, it is often served with dinner.
So how would Salmonella get in the Hojicha? Another good question. If the tea supplier was responsible, and being the leaves were roasted, it would have to be a case of cross contamination in the post-roasting environment.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm500342.htm
So what is Hojicha tea? Good question. Well, Hojicha tea is a roasted tea that is more mild and has less caffeine. The roasting process makes the tea leaves reddish in color and gives the tea a ' a toasty, slightly caramel-like flavor'. Because of the lower caffeine level, it is often served with dinner.
So how would Salmonella get in the Hojicha? Another good question. If the tea supplier was responsible, and being the leaves were roasted, it would have to be a case of cross contamination in the post-roasting environment.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm500342.htm
Frontier Co-op Initiates Voluntary Recall of Organic Hojicha Tea Due to Possible Health Risk
CRF Vegetables Leads to Recall of Fried Rice Product Which Leads to Recall of Chicken Fried Rice Product
In a series of recalls following the CRF vegetable recall - Ajinomoto Windsor, Inc recalled its fried rice products because they had CRF as a supplier of the vegetables used in the rice mixes. This then triggered Garland Ventures LTD, a Garland, Texas establishment to recall 114,870 pounds of chicken fried rice products. Both items are considered not ready-to-eat.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm499858.htm
Ajinomoto Windsor Recall of Products Related to CRF Frozen Vegetable Recall
For Immediate Release
May 7, 2016
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm499858.htm
Ajinomoto Windsor Recall of Products Related to CRF Frozen Vegetable Recall
For Immediate Release
May 7, 2016
Friday, May 6, 2016
Sunflower Seed Recall Forces a Large Cascade of Recalls
After SunOptima issued a recall for Listeria in sunflower seed, a number of their customers issued recalls. Probably more to come?
One this that would be good to know is how the sampling / testing occurred after product had shipped and was utilized by their customers.
Recalls listed below:
One this that would be good to know is how the sampling / testing occurred after product had shipped and was utilized by their customers.
Related Frozen Foods Recalls Point to Weakness in Supply Chain Controls - Only as Good as Your Supplier's Supplier
Two recalls for Listeria have been announced in wake of the CRF frozen produce recall, with probably more to come, One is from ConAgra Foods for organic frozen corn and peas sold under the Trader Joe's and Watts Brother labels. The other issued recall was by a Texas firm that is recalling fresh corn relish and bean salad. There will no doubt be more recalls to come as companies evaluate their supply chain.
At the heart of this is a very complex supply chain. CRF and Oregon Potato, two frozen food companies based in the Northwest are ground zero. The problem is that these companies produce product not only for retailers, but also for other manufactures through sales of bulk frozen product. What happens is this...as these seasonal produce items are harvested, much of it goes into bulk. Bulk allows manufacturers to repack product as needed to meet customer demand throughout the year. Within a given season, one company may pack more corn than they have sales for, so they sell bulk product to someone else who needs that product to fill their own orders. These transfers occur throughout the year and allow companies to be efficient in meeting the demand of their customers. That is the good part.
The problem arises when one of the companies has an issue, say Listeria, that then affects the whole chain. For example, Company A is repacking some mixed vegetable product and needs to purchase bulk peas or onions form Supplier B to help fill the order.. Now Company A, who has a great internal Listeria program, purchases Supplier B who may or may not have a good Listeria Program.. Supplier B provides a COA showing that lot was good (Listeria negative). But FDA makes a visit to Supplier B and in conducting environmental testing, they find Listeria in Supplier B's facility.. It could even be that Supplier B sold product to another company who is then implicated in an outbreak that traces back to Supplier B. In these cases, Company A must conduct a recall.
This can even go further back. Supplier B was a little short on onions and purchased onions from Supplier C to help fill their order to Company A. And it is found that Supplier C has an issue. That issue now becomes a problem for Supplier B as well as Company A. And if Company A is producing product for 10 different retailers, now you have a whole lot of retailers having to recall product. And if Supplier C was also selling bulk product to two other repacking companies who were producing product for a dozen more retailers, we can easily see how this can expand.
It is difficult to ensure that suppliers are adequately controlling risk, it can even be harder to make sure that the supplier's supplier is adequately controlling risk. Unfortunately, as logistics / purchasing people look to take advantage of co-packing opportunities, the true cost of risk control may not be considered. These costs can include extensive product testing, on-site visits, insistence that supplier institute aggressive Listeria control programs, etc. To be fair, Listeria control was probably not on many people mind when these deals were made. However, moving forward, it must become a part of the picture.
FDA Recall Notices
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm499623.htm
Company Announcement
When a company announces a recall, market withdrawal, or safety alert, the FDA posts the company's announcement as a public service. FDA does not endorse either the product or the company.
Watts Brothers Farms Organic Mixed Vegetables, Organic Super Sweet Corn, And Organic Peas And Trader Joe's Organic Super Sweet Corn Recalled Because Of Possible Health RiskFor Immediate Release
At the heart of this is a very complex supply chain. CRF and Oregon Potato, two frozen food companies based in the Northwest are ground zero. The problem is that these companies produce product not only for retailers, but also for other manufactures through sales of bulk frozen product. What happens is this...as these seasonal produce items are harvested, much of it goes into bulk. Bulk allows manufacturers to repack product as needed to meet customer demand throughout the year. Within a given season, one company may pack more corn than they have sales for, so they sell bulk product to someone else who needs that product to fill their own orders. These transfers occur throughout the year and allow companies to be efficient in meeting the demand of their customers. That is the good part.
The problem arises when one of the companies has an issue, say Listeria, that then affects the whole chain. For example, Company A is repacking some mixed vegetable product and needs to purchase bulk peas or onions form Supplier B to help fill the order.. Now Company A, who has a great internal Listeria program, purchases Supplier B who may or may not have a good Listeria Program.. Supplier B provides a COA showing that lot was good (Listeria negative). But FDA makes a visit to Supplier B and in conducting environmental testing, they find Listeria in Supplier B's facility.. It could even be that Supplier B sold product to another company who is then implicated in an outbreak that traces back to Supplier B. In these cases, Company A must conduct a recall.
This can even go further back. Supplier B was a little short on onions and purchased onions from Supplier C to help fill their order to Company A. And it is found that Supplier C has an issue. That issue now becomes a problem for Supplier B as well as Company A. And if Company A is producing product for 10 different retailers, now you have a whole lot of retailers having to recall product. And if Supplier C was also selling bulk product to two other repacking companies who were producing product for a dozen more retailers, we can easily see how this can expand.
It is difficult to ensure that suppliers are adequately controlling risk, it can even be harder to make sure that the supplier's supplier is adequately controlling risk. Unfortunately, as logistics / purchasing people look to take advantage of co-packing opportunities, the true cost of risk control may not be considered. These costs can include extensive product testing, on-site visits, insistence that supplier institute aggressive Listeria control programs, etc. To be fair, Listeria control was probably not on many people mind when these deals were made. However, moving forward, it must become a part of the picture.
FDA Recall Notices
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm499623.htm
Company Announcement
When a company announces a recall, market withdrawal, or safety alert, the FDA posts the company's announcement as a public service. FDA does not endorse either the product or the company.
Watts Brothers Farms Organic Mixed Vegetables, Organic Super Sweet Corn, And Organic Peas And Trader Joe's Organic Super Sweet Corn Recalled Because Of Possible Health RiskFor Immediate Release
Wednesday, May 4, 2016
Nut Products Recalled After Sunflower Seed Supplier Notifies of Potential Listeria Contamination
Tree House Foods is recalling a wide variety of snack bars and nut / trail mixes after receiving notification from their supplier that the sunflower seed may contain Listeria monocytogenes. Sun Optima, a Canadian firm, is also recalling sunflower seed products.
Sunflower seed would be considered a low risk product since they would not support growth, however the ingredient would be added as a RTE ingredient.
PRN Newsire
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/treehouse-foods-issues-voluntary-product-recall-due-to-possible-health-risk-300262111.html
TreeHouse Foods Issues Voluntary Product Recall Due to Possible Health Risk
Sunflower seed would be considered a low risk product since they would not support growth, however the ingredient would be added as a RTE ingredient.
PRN Newsire
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/treehouse-foods-issues-voluntary-product-recall-due-to-possible-health-risk-300262111.html
TreeHouse Foods Issues Voluntary Product Recall Due to Possible Health Risk
Case of Intentional Contamination in Michigan - Man Sprays Salad Bars with Chemical Mixture
In Michigan, a person was arrested after intentionally contaminating salad bars in local restaurants with a chemical mixture that included mouse poison. There have been no injuries reported.
This is a reminder that intentional contamination can occur and that employee in food establishments must always be on the lookout.
This is a reminder that intentional contamination can occur and that employee in food establishments must always be on the lookout.
Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development News Release
Advisory: Consumers Urged to Throw Away Potentially Contaminated Foods
Agency: Agriculture and Rural Development
Chicken Nuggets Recalled Due to Foreign Material
Foster Poultry is recalling 220,000 lbs of chicken nuggets because of the potential for foreign material - blue plastic and black rubber. The problem was discovered due to consumer complaints received by the company.
So far this year there have been a number of recalls due to foreign materials inclusion in product including another cook poultry product last month. These are extremely expensive mistakes that may not be given their due when complaints are received. These recalls should be a siren to evaluate consumer complaints and ensure that corrective action is being completed.
So far this year there have been a number of recalls due to foreign materials inclusion in product including another cook poultry product last month. These are extremely expensive mistakes that may not be given their due when complaints are received. These recalls should be a siren to evaluate consumer complaints and ensure that corrective action is being completed.
FSIS News Release
Foster Poultry Farms Recalls Poultry Products Due To Possible Foreign Materials Contamination
Class I Recall 033-2016
Health Risk: High Apr 29, 2016
Important Points in FSMA Final Rule on Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
Earlier this month, FDA issued the FSMA Final Rule on Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food. What are some interesting points you should know?
This rule defines transportation as “any movement of food in commerce by motor vehicle or rail vehicle” and establishes requirements for sanitary transportation practices applicable to shippers, loaders, carriers by motor vehicle and rail vehicle, and receivers engaged in food transportation operations. The rule address vehicles and transportation equipment; transportation operations; training; records; and waivers.
The goal is to ensure that practices are in place that prevents food from becoming adulterated during transport from such issues as failure to control temperatures or cross contamination or cross contact (allergens) from inadequate cleaning.
The rule makes the shipper responsible for compliance to the rule. The shipper is defined as the one who arranges for the transportation of food by the carrier. The shipper could be the manufacturer or a freight broker. By rule, the shipper must develop and implement procedures for required parameters such as temperature control and cleanliness of the vehicle. The shipper can transfer some of this responsibility to the ‘loader’ or the ‘carrier’ based upon contractual agreement. They must have documentation to demonstrate this.
The rule is not prescriptive in that FDA does not establish mandatory procedures; rather it allows industry to use best practices to do this. So there are no regulatory requirements for continuous temperature monitoring, or the sharing of documentation for each load, or how a truck should be cleaned. Rather, it requires the shipper determine what is best in order for that food to be transported without becoming adulterated.
While there are some exemptions from the rule for food that is transported, such as farm activities, most other transport is covered including intra-company transport and food destined for food banks.
What about food that arrives and is out of temperature? According to the rule "An inconsequential failure by a carrier to meet the shipper's temperature control specifications will not necessarily create a per se presumption that the affected food has become adulterated. However, if a person subject to this rule becomes aware of an indication of a possible material failure of temperature control or other conditions that may render the food unsafe during transportation, the person must take appropriate action to ensure that the food is not sold or otherwise distributed, unless a determination is made by a qualified individual that the temperature deviation or other condition did not render the food unsafe. Failure to take such action may render the food adulterated."
For Loaders, those who put product onto the trucks, they must check the vehicle for sanitary condition and ensure proper temperature control prior to loading.
For receivers, those who unload the product, they must ensure that the product was not temperature abused and intact.
Carriers, those transporting product, must meet conditions established by the shipper – to include having the right equipment to meet sanitary and temperature requirements. The must also provide cleaning as required.
When carriers have responsibilities put on them by the shippers, their employees must be trained about potential food safety problems and basic sanitary practices. This must be documented.
Here is a link to the final rule.
This rule defines transportation as “any movement of food in commerce by motor vehicle or rail vehicle” and establishes requirements for sanitary transportation practices applicable to shippers, loaders, carriers by motor vehicle and rail vehicle, and receivers engaged in food transportation operations. The rule address vehicles and transportation equipment; transportation operations; training; records; and waivers.
The goal is to ensure that practices are in place that prevents food from becoming adulterated during transport from such issues as failure to control temperatures or cross contamination or cross contact (allergens) from inadequate cleaning.
The rule makes the shipper responsible for compliance to the rule. The shipper is defined as the one who arranges for the transportation of food by the carrier. The shipper could be the manufacturer or a freight broker. By rule, the shipper must develop and implement procedures for required parameters such as temperature control and cleanliness of the vehicle. The shipper can transfer some of this responsibility to the ‘loader’ or the ‘carrier’ based upon contractual agreement. They must have documentation to demonstrate this.
The rule is not prescriptive in that FDA does not establish mandatory procedures; rather it allows industry to use best practices to do this. So there are no regulatory requirements for continuous temperature monitoring, or the sharing of documentation for each load, or how a truck should be cleaned. Rather, it requires the shipper determine what is best in order for that food to be transported without becoming adulterated.
While there are some exemptions from the rule for food that is transported, such as farm activities, most other transport is covered including intra-company transport and food destined for food banks.
What about food that arrives and is out of temperature? According to the rule "An inconsequential failure by a carrier to meet the shipper's temperature control specifications will not necessarily create a per se presumption that the affected food has become adulterated. However, if a person subject to this rule becomes aware of an indication of a possible material failure of temperature control or other conditions that may render the food unsafe during transportation, the person must take appropriate action to ensure that the food is not sold or otherwise distributed, unless a determination is made by a qualified individual that the temperature deviation or other condition did not render the food unsafe. Failure to take such action may render the food adulterated."
For Loaders, those who put product onto the trucks, they must check the vehicle for sanitary condition and ensure proper temperature control prior to loading.
For receivers, those who unload the product, they must ensure that the product was not temperature abused and intact.
Carriers, those transporting product, must meet conditions established by the shipper – to include having the right equipment to meet sanitary and temperature requirements. The must also provide cleaning as required.
When carriers have responsibilities put on them by the shippers, their employees must be trained about potential food safety problems and basic sanitary practices. This must be documented.
Here is a link to the final rule.
Justice Department Investigates Salad Plant After Listeria Outbreak
The US Justice Department is investigating the Dole with regard to the Salad / Listeria outbreak. The question being raised is 'what did they know'? This comes after an FDA inspection of the facility found Listeria monocytogenes.
The outcome of this investigation is important for processors who manufacturer products that can be affected by Listeria, especially those that had been regarded as lower risk (do not support appreciable growth). Why? Many manufacturers have Listeria Control Programs that have verification monitoring that focuses on Listeria species testing before production, or pre-operational, on non-food-contact environmental surfaces. If found, then corrective action focuses on cleaning that area.
The concern is that this may not be aggressive enough. We have now seen that Listeria can be an issue in product that supports minimal to no growth. For one, we do not know how the consumer is going to handle products - perhaps using them as an ingredient in foods that better support growth, and in light of the Blue Bell outbreak, what minimal levels can cause illness in those at highest risk. A more aggressive sampling would look at sampling during production and looking more at food contact surfaces.
Can you fault the plant? Not based upon the current FDA Listeria Control Guidance. What will it look like going further?
Wall Street Journal
http://www.wsj.com/articles/dole-food-under-investigation-over-listeria-outbreak-linked-to-salads-1461966955#:tqCQf4DgV4N9hA
Business
U.S. Probes Dole Food Over Listeria Outbreak Linked to Salads
Samples suggest Dole had evidence of bacteria at Ohio plant a year earlier
The outcome of this investigation is important for processors who manufacturer products that can be affected by Listeria, especially those that had been regarded as lower risk (do not support appreciable growth). Why? Many manufacturers have Listeria Control Programs that have verification monitoring that focuses on Listeria species testing before production, or pre-operational, on non-food-contact environmental surfaces. If found, then corrective action focuses on cleaning that area.
The concern is that this may not be aggressive enough. We have now seen that Listeria can be an issue in product that supports minimal to no growth. For one, we do not know how the consumer is going to handle products - perhaps using them as an ingredient in foods that better support growth, and in light of the Blue Bell outbreak, what minimal levels can cause illness in those at highest risk. A more aggressive sampling would look at sampling during production and looking more at food contact surfaces.
Can you fault the plant? Not based upon the current FDA Listeria Control Guidance. What will it look like going further?
Wall Street Journal
http://www.wsj.com/articles/dole-food-under-investigation-over-listeria-outbreak-linked-to-salads-1461966955#:tqCQf4DgV4N9hA
Business
U.S. Probes Dole Food Over Listeria Outbreak Linked to Salads
Samples suggest Dole had evidence of bacteria at Ohio plant a year earlier
Massive Recall of Frozen Vegetables Follows Linkage to Listeria Outbreak
A Washington state frozen food manufacturer is recalling frozen vegetable products affecting approximately 2 years of production, 358 consumer products sold under 42 separate brands
This was an expansion of a recall that was issued on April 23rd after the Ohio state health officials reported the finding. Since that time, it had been linked to 8 cases. (2 deaths are listed on the CDC website, but they state it was not due to Listeria. Complications from Listeria?). CRF had suspended operations after the first recall in April and had not resumed production. FDA did isolate Listeria monocytogenes from the facility and "...... were found to be closely related genetically to seven of the isolates of ill people associated with this outbreak."
In the CDC report [below], a linkage was made after the Ohio state isolated the organism from frozen product. It does not appear this product was sampled because of linkage to the outbreak in that the report states there were no reported illnesses. It is also important to not that while 2 cases were from 2016, the other cases were said to have been done in a 'retrospective analysis' where the DNA from the isolated organism was matched against past outbreak cases.
According to the CDC Report, "Whole genome sequencing showed that the Listeria isolate from the frozen corn was closely related genetically to seven bacterial isolates from ill people, and the Listeria isolate from the frozen peas was closely related genetically to one isolate from an ill person. The way his case has unfolded looks very similar to the Blue Bell outbreak/recall.
The products include organic and non-organic broccoli, butternut squash, carrots, cauliflower, corn, edamame, green beans, Italian beans, kale, leeks, lima beans, onions, peas, pepper strips, potatoes, potato medley, root medley, spinach, sweet potatoes, various vegetable medleys, blends, and stir fry packages, blueberries, cherries, cranberries, peaches, raspberries, and strawberries. Brands include Trader Joes, Kirkland, and Great Value as well as others.
There are some things that would be good to know.
1) The products in question required cooking....were they cooked by the consumers who became ill?
2) The report states that he Listeria isolated from product and in the outbreak cases were closely related. How close is close?
3) What type of Listeria Control Program did the facility have?
FDA News Release
http://www.fda.gov/Food/RecallsOutbreaksEmergencies/Outbreaks/ucm499157.htm
FDA Investigates Listeria Outbreak Linked to Frozen Vegetables
May 4, 2016
What is the Problem and What is Being Done About It?
The FDA, CDC and state and local officials are investigating a multi-state outbreak of listeriosis identified in March 2016.
This was an expansion of a recall that was issued on April 23rd after the Ohio state health officials reported the finding. Since that time, it had been linked to 8 cases. (2 deaths are listed on the CDC website, but they state it was not due to Listeria. Complications from Listeria?). CRF had suspended operations after the first recall in April and had not resumed production. FDA did isolate Listeria monocytogenes from the facility and "...... were found to be closely related genetically to seven of the isolates of ill people associated with this outbreak."
In the CDC report [below], a linkage was made after the Ohio state isolated the organism from frozen product. It does not appear this product was sampled because of linkage to the outbreak in that the report states there were no reported illnesses. It is also important to not that while 2 cases were from 2016, the other cases were said to have been done in a 'retrospective analysis' where the DNA from the isolated organism was matched against past outbreak cases.
According to the CDC Report, "Whole genome sequencing showed that the Listeria isolate from the frozen corn was closely related genetically to seven bacterial isolates from ill people, and the Listeria isolate from the frozen peas was closely related genetically to one isolate from an ill person. The way his case has unfolded looks very similar to the Blue Bell outbreak/recall.
The products include organic and non-organic broccoli, butternut squash, carrots, cauliflower, corn, edamame, green beans, Italian beans, kale, leeks, lima beans, onions, peas, pepper strips, potatoes, potato medley, root medley, spinach, sweet potatoes, various vegetable medleys, blends, and stir fry packages, blueberries, cherries, cranberries, peaches, raspberries, and strawberries. Brands include Trader Joes, Kirkland, and Great Value as well as others.
There are some things that would be good to know.
1) The products in question required cooking....were they cooked by the consumers who became ill?
2) The report states that he Listeria isolated from product and in the outbreak cases were closely related. How close is close?
3) What type of Listeria Control Program did the facility have?
FDA News Release
http://www.fda.gov/Food/RecallsOutbreaksEmergencies/Outbreaks/ucm499157.htm
FDA Investigates Listeria Outbreak Linked to Frozen Vegetables
May 4, 2016
What is the Problem and What is Being Done About It?
The FDA, CDC and state and local officials are investigating a multi-state outbreak of listeriosis identified in March 2016.
Friday, April 29, 2016
Thriving in a Post-Chipotle World
In light of their food safety gaffs, the restaurant chain Chipotle is still struggle to recover. In their first quarter report, sales are down 30% in same-store sales and their share price is down about 40%.
But where there is decline for one, others have thrived. Panera sales have increased, with same-stores increase of 4.7%
Business Insider
http://www.businessinsider.com/panera-benefits-from-chipotles-downfall-2016-4
PANERA PRESIDENT: 'We live in a post-Chipotle world'
Kate Taylor
Apr. 27, 2016, 10:57 AM
As Chipotle struggles, Panera is thriving.
But where there is decline for one, others have thrived. Panera sales have increased, with same-stores increase of 4.7%
Business Insider
http://www.businessinsider.com/panera-benefits-from-chipotles-downfall-2016-4
PANERA PRESIDENT: 'We live in a post-Chipotle world'
Kate Taylor
Apr. 27, 2016, 10:57 AM
As Chipotle struggles, Panera is thriving.
FDA Inspection Report from Salad Facility Responsible for Listieria Outbreak
Earlier this year, bagged salads produced by Dole in their Ohio facility, were involved in a Listeria outbreak. According to the CDC Final Report, issued March 31 2016, 19 people became infected and there was 1 death. In Canada, the CFIA reported 14 cases and 3 deaths, although stated that the deaths may or may not be related to Listeria monocytogenes (LM).
FDA conducted an investigation of the facility and during that investigation, completed environmental sampling. A 483 report was issued, and thanks to the Marler Blog, that report was posted (a 2014 report was also included there, but was not included here). In reviewing this 483 report, there were some important findings. A summary of those below as well as reports.
(An FDA 483 Report 'lists observations made by the FDA representative(s) during the inspection of your facility. They are inspectional observations, and do not represent a final Agency determination regarding your compliance')
OBSERVATION 1
Failure to perform microbial testing where necessary to identify sanitation failures and possible food contamination.
FDA conducted an investigation of the facility and during that investigation, completed environmental sampling. A 483 report was issued, and thanks to the Marler Blog, that report was posted (a 2014 report was also included there, but was not included here). In reviewing this 483 report, there were some important findings. A summary of those below as well as reports.
(An FDA 483 Report 'lists observations made by the FDA representative(s) during the inspection of your facility. They are inspectional observations, and do not represent a final Agency determination regarding your compliance')
OBSERVATION 1
Failure to perform microbial testing where necessary to identify sanitation failures and possible food contamination.
Thursday, April 28, 2016
Cooked Poultry Products Recalled Because of Foreign Material
Pilgrim's Pride is recalling 4.5 million pounds of cooked chicken products, institutional or foodservice packs, due to the potential for foreign matter. The issue was initially identified by customer complaints received by the company, and after notifying FSIS, FSIS then identified additional consumer complaint issues. No injuries have been reported.
The recalled product has the EST. 20728 posted, indicating the product came out of their Waco TX processing facility. The period of time is 18months from August of 2014 to March of 2015.
This is a surprising amount of product in a very large time frame to be included in a Class 1 recall, especially considering there were no injuries reported. This is the expansion of the April 7th recall that focused on institutional packs of chicken nuggets.
USDA Recall Notice
http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2016/recall-027-2016-expanded
Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. Recalls Poultry Products Due To Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class I Recall 027-2016 EXP
Health Risk: High Apr 26, 2016
The recalled product has the EST. 20728 posted, indicating the product came out of their Waco TX processing facility. The period of time is 18months from August of 2014 to March of 2015.
This is a surprising amount of product in a very large time frame to be included in a Class 1 recall, especially considering there were no injuries reported. This is the expansion of the April 7th recall that focused on institutional packs of chicken nuggets.
USDA Recall Notice
http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2016/recall-027-2016-expanded
Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. Recalls Poultry Products Due To Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class I Recall 027-2016 EXP
Health Risk: High Apr 26, 2016
Sunday, April 24, 2016
Tea Bags Recalled for Salmonella After Ingredient Tests Positive for Salmonella
CVS Pharmacy is recalling tea bags after an ingredient produced by the manufacturer’s raw material supplier tested positive for Salmonella in another company’s product.
The tea, if prepared with boiling water, would eliminate the pathogen. However, it is one of the reasons why drinking sun tea is not a good idea.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm497299.htm
CVS Pharmacy Announces Voluntary Recall of Gold Emblem Abound Organic Spiced Herbal Tea Due to Possible Health Risk
The tea, if prepared with boiling water, would eliminate the pathogen. However, it is one of the reasons why drinking sun tea is not a good idea.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm497299.htm
CVS Pharmacy Announces Voluntary Recall of Gold Emblem Abound Organic Spiced Herbal Tea Due to Possible Health Risk
Frozen Vegetables Recalled due to Positive Listeria Tests
A Washington state firm is recalling frozen vegetables after a lot of IQF organic peas and a lot of IQF organic corn tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes. The testing was completed by Ohio state health officials. There have been no injuries to report.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm497297.htm
CRF Frozen Foods Recalls Frozen Vegetables Due to Possible Health Risk
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm497297.htm
CRF Frozen Foods Recalls Frozen Vegetables Due to Possible Health Risk
Friday, April 22, 2016
Earth Day - Reducing Food Waste and the Challenge for Food Safety
One of the challenges that will increasingly challenge food safety professionals is the increased pressure on becoming more sustainable, especially on reducing food waste. As people are told to reduce their food waste, there will be more pressure to keep food longer than it should be, or to use food that may not be as good as it should be (trying to rescue decaying fruit for example). Throw in the fact that there are more agricultural commodities coming from organic practices which can have higher rates of product deterioration.
Much of this will come down to improving our systems from farm to table. Culling systems that can remove real spoilage issues at the farm and packing house. Improved logistics to move product quickly and under the right conditions to the point of sale or processing. An understanding by consumers of what is actually bad versus not pretty but okay to eat. Planning by the consumer is another important control....that is, don't buy so much or make too much of something that you get to the spot when you have to decide if it is still good because of shelf-life. We answer so many questions from people who are worried about a chicken dish they made days ago or a jar of pickles that is two months past the shelf-life. The key is to manage what you have so you never get to that point.
Then there are some who insist that the issue is the shelf-life dates used by manufacturers. Correct, these dates are mainly based on quality, not safety. However, increasing the date could mean that you get a lower quality product. Did you ever taste a shelf-stable juice product in a plastic container past the shelf-life...it may be safe, but it tastes...well, it doesn't taste...no flavor.
USDA News Release
http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/newsroom/news-releases-statements-transcripts/news-release-archives-by-year/archive/2016/nr-041816-01
Much of this will come down to improving our systems from farm to table. Culling systems that can remove real spoilage issues at the farm and packing house. Improved logistics to move product quickly and under the right conditions to the point of sale or processing. An understanding by consumers of what is actually bad versus not pretty but okay to eat. Planning by the consumer is another important control....that is, don't buy so much or make too much of something that you get to the spot when you have to decide if it is still good because of shelf-life. We answer so many questions from people who are worried about a chicken dish they made days ago or a jar of pickles that is two months past the shelf-life. The key is to manage what you have so you never get to that point.
Then there are some who insist that the issue is the shelf-life dates used by manufacturers. Correct, these dates are mainly based on quality, not safety. However, increasing the date could mean that you get a lower quality product. Did you ever taste a shelf-stable juice product in a plastic container past the shelf-life...it may be safe, but it tastes...well, it doesn't taste...no flavor.
USDA News Release
http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/newsroom/news-releases-statements-transcripts/news-release-archives-by-year/archive/2016/nr-041816-01
USDA Tips for Reducing Food Waste and Preventing Illness
Wednesday, April 20, 2016
Small Firm Recalls Vegetable Soup Due to Improper Processing
A small Lancaster, PA firm is recalling jars of vegetable soup because it was determined they were not following regulations for processing this type of product.
Vegetable soup is normally a low acid product, (finished equilibrium pH greater than 4.6 and a water activity greater than 0.85). To make this product, a manufacturer must follow the Low Acid Canned Food Regulations (LACF) which requires that a firm have an established process and that process is filed. Generally, small firms are limited to canning high acid foods or acidified foods that have a pH of 4.6 or less.
In this case, the product was close to the pH of 4.6 so perhaps their goal was having an acidified food where the acid portion, perhaps a tomato base and some added acid, was expected to reduce the pH below 4.6. However, this was not being achieved. Another important element is that it is the particulates in the soup that must also reach an equilibrium pH of less than 4.6....not just the broth. (Hard to tell what was actually being measured from the report).
It is important for small firms to understand canning regulations. This is not the first instance of a company producing low acid foods - whether they did not know the regulations, or the process they used did not achieve the pH they wanted. This can be an issue with small firms who want to make products for sale at farmers' markets.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm496909.htm
Mary's Home Canning Recalls Mary's Home Made Vegetable Soup Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
April 15, 2016
Vegetable soup is normally a low acid product, (finished equilibrium pH greater than 4.6 and a water activity greater than 0.85). To make this product, a manufacturer must follow the Low Acid Canned Food Regulations (LACF) which requires that a firm have an established process and that process is filed. Generally, small firms are limited to canning high acid foods or acidified foods that have a pH of 4.6 or less.
In this case, the product was close to the pH of 4.6 so perhaps their goal was having an acidified food where the acid portion, perhaps a tomato base and some added acid, was expected to reduce the pH below 4.6. However, this was not being achieved. Another important element is that it is the particulates in the soup that must also reach an equilibrium pH of less than 4.6....not just the broth. (Hard to tell what was actually being measured from the report).
It is important for small firms to understand canning regulations. This is not the first instance of a company producing low acid foods - whether they did not know the regulations, or the process they used did not achieve the pH they wanted. This can be an issue with small firms who want to make products for sale at farmers' markets.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm496909.htm
Mary's Home Canning Recalls Mary's Home Made Vegetable Soup Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
April 15, 2016
Hepatitis A Outbreak Linked to Frozen Berries - Canada
An outbreak of Hepatitis A in Canada has been linked to bags of mixed frozen berries. From the label on the package, it appears that the berries are, at least in part, imported berries.
How does this occur? Most likely an infected worker handling the fruit, probably at the point of harvest or initial processing, would have contaminated the fruit. Because the fruit is often used without any further processing, there is no point for reduction of the virus.
How can it be prevented? This is a RTE product. So strategic sourcing is critical. Have the farms implemented GAP procedures, especially those controls for farm employee health and exclusion of ill employees? This can be a more difficult issue with Hepatitis A where an employee can be contagious and not yet show signs of illness.
This has not been the first issue associated with frozen fruit products, so this indicates that there is more work to do with sourcing fruit from farms with good practices.
What is the impact? Hepatitis A is highly infectious. There is a period of time, about two weeks, from when a person is exposed where a vaccination can be helpful. The challenge is getting word out to those who purchased product. Once infected, the symptoms can vary from fever, low appetite, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle aches, to jaundice. Long term liver damage can be a risk for those high risk individuals.
The Star (Canada)
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/04/19/recalled-costco-frozen-berries-linked-to-13-cases-of-hepatitis-a.html
Recalled Costco frozen berries linked to 13 cases of Hepatitis A
Store is offering vaccinations to those who may have eaten its Nature’s Touch Organic Berry Cherry Blend that was recalled Saturday by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
By: The Canadian Press, Published on Tue Apr 19 2016
How does this occur? Most likely an infected worker handling the fruit, probably at the point of harvest or initial processing, would have contaminated the fruit. Because the fruit is often used without any further processing, there is no point for reduction of the virus.
How can it be prevented? This is a RTE product. So strategic sourcing is critical. Have the farms implemented GAP procedures, especially those controls for farm employee health and exclusion of ill employees? This can be a more difficult issue with Hepatitis A where an employee can be contagious and not yet show signs of illness.
This has not been the first issue associated with frozen fruit products, so this indicates that there is more work to do with sourcing fruit from farms with good practices.
What is the impact? Hepatitis A is highly infectious. There is a period of time, about two weeks, from when a person is exposed where a vaccination can be helpful. The challenge is getting word out to those who purchased product. Once infected, the symptoms can vary from fever, low appetite, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, muscle aches, to jaundice. Long term liver damage can be a risk for those high risk individuals.
The Star (Canada)
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2016/04/19/recalled-costco-frozen-berries-linked-to-13-cases-of-hepatitis-a.html
Recalled Costco frozen berries linked to 13 cases of Hepatitis A
Store is offering vaccinations to those who may have eaten its Nature’s Touch Organic Berry Cherry Blend that was recalled Saturday by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency.
By: The Canadian Press, Published on Tue Apr 19 2016
Monday, April 11, 2016
Listeria Control - What Will the FDA Guidance Look Like
Jennifer McEntire and Clay Detlefsen have written a nice article on Listeria monocytogenes control in food operations, comparing FSIS and FDA approaches to this point in time and suggesting what is to come with FDA guidance.
As we have seen with a number of recent recalls where product is recalled after test results come back positive, these facilities do not have good controls in place. One can bet that FDA might be playing a heavier hand with facilities in light of these recall issues.
As we have seen with a number of recent recalls where product is recalled after test results come back positive, these facilities do not have good controls in place. One can bet that FDA might be playing a heavier hand with facilities in light of these recall issues.
Quality Assurance and Food Safety
The Perplexing Challenge of Lm Control
GMA Update - GMA Update
Are we heading toward a unified approach?
Starting a Food Business Begins with Understanding Food Safety
Nice article in QA&FS on starting a food business and the need to understand food safety parameters. The information presented mirrors what we have found - when people understand the food safety elements, they are better able to design their process and product.
Too many new processors develop their process and then have to redo their concept after discovering that they have created opportunities for spoilage or pathogen contamination. Understanding HACCP principles, which is really a risk analysis, helps the new processor evaluate the process and identify the needed controls. They learn about proper process flow to prevent cross contamination, processing parameters to eliminate pathogens, and sanitation to remove hazards such as allergens.
Supplier control is another important concept for the entrepreneur, especially if that person is considering having another group co-pack the product. While it is the co-packer who will be tasked with control, it helps if the entrepreneur has an understanding of what the co-packer should be doing. Ultimately, it is the entrepreneurs label that goes on the product.
For more resources on Starting a Food Business, visit this Penn State website:
http://extension.psu.edu/food/entrepreneurs/starting-a-business
Quality Assurance and Food Safety
http://www.qualityassurancemag.com/article/small-business-success/
Small Business Success
Features - Plant Management
Overcoming the Challenges of Limited Funds and Resources
April 8, 2016
Lisa Lupo
Too many new processors develop their process and then have to redo their concept after discovering that they have created opportunities for spoilage or pathogen contamination. Understanding HACCP principles, which is really a risk analysis, helps the new processor evaluate the process and identify the needed controls. They learn about proper process flow to prevent cross contamination, processing parameters to eliminate pathogens, and sanitation to remove hazards such as allergens.
Supplier control is another important concept for the entrepreneur, especially if that person is considering having another group co-pack the product. While it is the co-packer who will be tasked with control, it helps if the entrepreneur has an understanding of what the co-packer should be doing. Ultimately, it is the entrepreneurs label that goes on the product.
For more resources on Starting a Food Business, visit this Penn State website:
http://extension.psu.edu/food/entrepreneurs/starting-a-business
Quality Assurance and Food Safety
http://www.qualityassurancemag.com/article/small-business-success/
Small Business Success
Features - Plant Management
Overcoming the Challenges of Limited Funds and Resources
April 8, 2016
Lisa Lupo
Salad Items Recalled after Supplier Notification of Listeria Positive Ingredient
Reser's Fine Foods of Oregon is recalling refrigerated salad items (egg salad, potato salad, macaroni salad) of various sizes (3.5oz to 8lb tubs) and various brands (Sysco, Safeway, Walmart, and Resser's) after their supplier that the onions supplied to Resser's tested positive for Listeria.
This is one of those cases where the supplier must be shipping product before they have results back, or perhaps where another customer tested the incoming onions and found that they were positive. Regardless, the work now falls on the manufacturer to recall the product.
Unfortunately, there have been too many issues with Listeria in produce operations. Supplier control, especially when those items are used in RTE applications, must focus on how the supplier is controlling Listeria in their processing environment. Is the environment cleanable to the microbiological level? Are they monitoring the environment for Listeria?
Reser's Recall Notice
https://www.resers.com/images/uploads/news/Press_Release_FINAL.pdf
RESER’S FINE FOODS, INC. RECALLS REFRIGERATED SALADS BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE HEALTH RISK DUE TO ONION SUPPLIER RECALL
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
APRIL 10, 2016
MEDIA CONTACT: LINDA RIEDMAN 503-267-8373
Reser’s Fine Foods, Inc. of Beaverton, Oregon is recalling nineteen refrigerated salad items due to notification from one of our ingredient suppliers that Listeria monocytogenes may be present in one lot of onions that was used in the manufacture of these salads. Listeria monocytogenes is an organism which can cause serious and sometime fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people and individuals with weakened immune systems. Healthy people may suffer only short term symptoms such as high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea. Listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant woman.
This is one of those cases where the supplier must be shipping product before they have results back, or perhaps where another customer tested the incoming onions and found that they were positive. Regardless, the work now falls on the manufacturer to recall the product.
Unfortunately, there have been too many issues with Listeria in produce operations. Supplier control, especially when those items are used in RTE applications, must focus on how the supplier is controlling Listeria in their processing environment. Is the environment cleanable to the microbiological level? Are they monitoring the environment for Listeria?
Reser's Recall Notice
https://www.resers.com/images/uploads/news/Press_Release_FINAL.pdf
RESER’S FINE FOODS, INC. RECALLS REFRIGERATED SALADS BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE HEALTH RISK DUE TO ONION SUPPLIER RECALL
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
APRIL 10, 2016
MEDIA CONTACT: LINDA RIEDMAN 503-267-8373
Reser’s Fine Foods, Inc. of Beaverton, Oregon is recalling nineteen refrigerated salad items due to notification from one of our ingredient suppliers that Listeria monocytogenes may be present in one lot of onions that was used in the manufacture of these salads. Listeria monocytogenes is an organism which can cause serious and sometime fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people and individuals with weakened immune systems. Healthy people may suffer only short term symptoms such as high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea. Listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant woman.
Sunday, April 10, 2016
Sliced Apples Recalled in Texas Due to Listeria Positive Samples
A Texas food company, Fresh From Texas, is recalling products containing sliced apples after its own testing found two Listeria monocytogenes-positive samples. The product was sold through the food retailer HEB. The product was sold in bags and trays, also as part of multiple fruit trays.
No illnesses have been reported.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm494345.htm
Fresh From Texas Recalls Apple Product Because Of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
April 5, 2016
No illnesses have been reported.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm494345.htm
Fresh From Texas Recalls Apple Product Because Of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
April 5, 2016
Tuesday, April 5, 2016
Lab Error Blamed for 2012 Case of Chocolate Recalled for Salmonella
In 2012, chocolate bars from Belgium were rejected for import into the US after a Belgium laboratory reported the product as Salmonella positive. The product was destroyed. After an investigation, the Salmonella strain identified was the same strain found by the laboratory in fish meal. Cross contamination in the laboratory? That is what is believed. Unfortunately, a few years back, there were not the whole genomic sequencing tools readily available as we do today.
This puts a light on laboratories and the impact of poor practices can have on a company's product. Tight controls need to be in place to prevent cross contamination. Companies need to question results that seem unlikely. Today, further investigation can be completed using whole genome sequencing to rule out laboratory error, including excluding the laboratory's positive control sample.
BioMed Centralhttp://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-016-1969-7
Case report of Salmonella cross-contamination in a food laboratory
This puts a light on laboratories and the impact of poor practices can have on a company's product. Tight controls need to be in place to prevent cross contamination. Companies need to question results that seem unlikely. Today, further investigation can be completed using whole genome sequencing to rule out laboratory error, including excluding the laboratory's positive control sample.
BioMed Centralhttp://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13104-016-1969-7
Case report of Salmonella cross-contamination in a food laboratory
FSMA Rule for Sanitary Transport of Food - Summary
FDA issued the final rule for the sanitary transport of food. The final rule applies to shippers, receivers, loaders and carriers who transport food in the United States by motor or rail vehicle.
It is important that companies evaluate their own shipping, and if using third party shippers, that those trucking companies are in compliance. This will apply to USDA product.
Key Provisions:
It is important that companies evaluate their own shipping, and if using third party shippers, that those trucking companies are in compliance. This will apply to USDA product.
Key Provisions:
- The design and maintenance of vehicles and transportation equipment to ensure that it does not cause the food that it transports to become unsafe.
- Measures taken during transportation to ensure food safety - Including adequate
- temperature controls,
- preventing contamination of ready to eat food from touching raw food,
- protection of food from contamination by non-food items in the same load or previous load, and protection of food from cross-contact (including the unintentional incorporation of a food allergen.)
- Training of carrier personnel in sanitary transportation practices and documentation of the training when the carrier is responsible for sanitary conditions during transport. (FDA plans to have an on-line training program).
- Maintenance of records of written procedures, agreements and training (required of carriers). The required retention time for these records not exceed 12 months (depending on the type of record.
- Shippers, receivers, or carriers engaged in food transportation operations that have less than $500,000 in average annual revenue
- Transportation activities performed by a farm
- Transportation of food that is completely enclosed by a container except a food that requires temperature control for safety
- Food shipped through the US but not consumed in US.
FDA - FSMA
Fact Sheet
FSMA Final Rule on Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food
Complete Rule in PDF
The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) rule on Sanitary Transportation of Human and Animal Food is now final, advancing FDA’s efforts to protect foods from farm to table by keeping them safe from contamination during transportation. The earliest compliance dates for some firms begin one year after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register.
Monday, April 4, 2016
Roasted Red Peppers Recalled Due To Consumer Complaints on Glass Pieces
Cans of roasted red pepper strips are being recalled due to the possible presence of glass pieces. The recall comes after the firm received complaints. There have been no injuries.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm493852.htm
Roland Foods, LLC, Initiates A Voluntary Recall Of Roland® Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips Due To The Possible Presence Of Glass In The Product
For Immediate Release
April 1, 2016
Contact Consumers Consumer Hotline 800.221.4030 ext. 222
Announcement
View Product Photos
Roland Foods, LLC, of New York, NY, in cooperation with the manufacturer in Peru, is initiating a voluntary recall of specific lots of Roland® Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips due to the possible presence of glass fragments in the product, therefore posing a potential health hazard.
Roland® Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips were distributed nationwide and to Canada to food distributors, food service customers, and super market chains for further distribution or use.
The following product is subject to the voluntary recall:
Roland® Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips, NET Wt. 5 LB. 8 OZ. can
Item #: 45628
Lot #s: 427, 428, 432, 437
UPC #: 10041224456287 (carton) and 041224456280 (can)
Pack Size: 6 x 5 LB. 8 OZ. cans per shipping carton
Production Codes (code is ink jet printed on the top of the can):
G1 MSS 1 P0929 and G1 MSS 2 P0929
Carton Markings:
ITEM 45628
LOT #s: 427, 428, 432, 437
Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips
Roland®
UPC 10041224456287
No other sizes of Roland® Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips or products are affected by the voluntary recall.
No illnesses have been reported to date.
The recall was initiated after the firm received customer complaints of glass in the product. The recalling firm has notified the manufacturer of the findings in order to conduct an investigation as to what caused the problem.
Consumers can visit www.rolandfood.com
, or contact its Consumer Hotline at 1-800.221.4030 ext. 222, Monday – Friday, 9am-5pm EST, for further information about the voluntary recall and for instructions on obtaining replacement product.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm493852.htm
Roland Foods, LLC, Initiates A Voluntary Recall Of Roland® Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips Due To The Possible Presence Of Glass In The Product
For Immediate Release
April 1, 2016
Contact Consumers Consumer Hotline 800.221.4030 ext. 222
Announcement
View Product Photos
Roland Foods, LLC, of New York, NY, in cooperation with the manufacturer in Peru, is initiating a voluntary recall of specific lots of Roland® Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips due to the possible presence of glass fragments in the product, therefore posing a potential health hazard.
Roland® Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips were distributed nationwide and to Canada to food distributors, food service customers, and super market chains for further distribution or use.
The following product is subject to the voluntary recall:
Roland® Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips, NET Wt. 5 LB. 8 OZ. can
Item #: 45628
Lot #s: 427, 428, 432, 437
UPC #: 10041224456287 (carton) and 041224456280 (can)
Pack Size: 6 x 5 LB. 8 OZ. cans per shipping carton
Production Codes (code is ink jet printed on the top of the can):
G1 MSS 1 P0929 and G1 MSS 2 P0929
Carton Markings:
ITEM 45628
LOT #s: 427, 428, 432, 437
Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips
Roland®
UPC 10041224456287
No other sizes of Roland® Fire Roasted Red Pepper Strips or products are affected by the voluntary recall.
No illnesses have been reported to date.
The recall was initiated after the firm received customer complaints of glass in the product. The recalling firm has notified the manufacturer of the findings in order to conduct an investigation as to what caused the problem.
Consumers can visit www.rolandfood.com
, or contact its Consumer Hotline at 1-800.221.4030 ext. 222, Monday – Friday, 9am-5pm EST, for further information about the voluntary recall and for instructions on obtaining replacement product.Cashew Products Recalled for Potential for Small Glass Pieces
Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. is recalling for a limited amount of Emerald® 100 Calorie Pack Roasted & Salted Cashew Halves & Pieces product, due to the possible presence of small glass pieces. The glass pieces were believed to have come in on the incoming product.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm493872.htm
Snyder's-Lance Announces Voluntary Recall of a Limited Number of Emerald® Cashew Roasted & Salted Halves & Pieces Due to Potential Presence of Glass
For Immediate Release
April 1, 2016
Contact
Consumers Consumer Affairs http://www.emeraldnuts.com/contact-emerald/ 503-364-0399
Announcement
View Product Photos
Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. is initiating a voluntary recall for a limited amount of Emerald® 100 Calorie Pack Roasted & Salted Cashew Halves & Pieces product, distributed nationwide, due to the possible presence of small glass pieces. This voluntary recall covers only specific production codes of the following product:
Emerald® 100 Calorie Pack Roasted & Salted Cashew Halves & Pieces 7 Packs / 0.62oz
No injuries have been reported to date. We are recalling these products because they may contain small pieces of glass that could potentially cause injury. Although our investigation is ongoing, we believe the source of the glass to be the raw cashews received from one of our suppliers under a specific lot code.
We are taking this action out of an abundance of caution after receiving a consumer complaint.
Consumers who may have purchased the product listed above should not consume it but should contact Consumer Affairs for a full refund online at http://www.emeraldnuts.com/contact-emerald/ or by calling 503-364-0399 between 8am and 5pm Pacific Time, Monday – Friday.
The voluntary recall is limited to the production codes listed below. To locate the production code on the carton or inner package, consumers should look next to the nutrition facts panel. No other production codes, sizes or varieties of Emerald products are affected by this recall.
Information regarding Emerald product affected by this recall:
Product NameRetail Carton UPC CodeRetail Carton Best Before DateInner Package UPC CodeInner Package Production Code
Emerald 100 Calorie Packs Roasted & Salted Cashew Halves & Pieces 0 10300 33324 1 12 DEC 16
13 DEC 16
18 DEC 16
21 DEC 16 0 10300 33399 9 15346D346S
15347D346S
15352D346S
15355D346S
The quality and safety of our products are the top priority for our company. We apologize to our retail customers and consumers and sincerely regret any inconvenience created by this recall. We are working and cooperating fully with the U. S. Food & Drug Administration on this voluntary recall.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm493872.htm
Snyder's-Lance Announces Voluntary Recall of a Limited Number of Emerald® Cashew Roasted & Salted Halves & Pieces Due to Potential Presence of Glass
For Immediate Release
April 1, 2016
Contact
Consumers Consumer Affairs http://www.emeraldnuts.com/contact-emerald/ 503-364-0399
Announcement
View Product Photos
Snyder’s-Lance, Inc. is initiating a voluntary recall for a limited amount of Emerald® 100 Calorie Pack Roasted & Salted Cashew Halves & Pieces product, distributed nationwide, due to the possible presence of small glass pieces. This voluntary recall covers only specific production codes of the following product:
Emerald® 100 Calorie Pack Roasted & Salted Cashew Halves & Pieces 7 Packs / 0.62oz
No injuries have been reported to date. We are recalling these products because they may contain small pieces of glass that could potentially cause injury. Although our investigation is ongoing, we believe the source of the glass to be the raw cashews received from one of our suppliers under a specific lot code.
We are taking this action out of an abundance of caution after receiving a consumer complaint.
Consumers who may have purchased the product listed above should not consume it but should contact Consumer Affairs for a full refund online at http://www.emeraldnuts.com/contact-emerald/ or by calling 503-364-0399 between 8am and 5pm Pacific Time, Monday – Friday.
The voluntary recall is limited to the production codes listed below. To locate the production code on the carton or inner package, consumers should look next to the nutrition facts panel. No other production codes, sizes or varieties of Emerald products are affected by this recall.
Information regarding Emerald product affected by this recall:
Product NameRetail Carton UPC CodeRetail Carton Best Before DateInner Package UPC CodeInner Package Production Code
Emerald 100 Calorie Packs Roasted & Salted Cashew Halves & Pieces 0 10300 33324 1 12 DEC 16
13 DEC 16
18 DEC 16
21 DEC 16 0 10300 33399 9 15346D346S
15347D346S
15352D346S
15355D346S
The quality and safety of our products are the top priority for our company. We apologize to our retail customers and consumers and sincerely regret any inconvenience created by this recall. We are working and cooperating fully with the U. S. Food & Drug Administration on this voluntary recall.
Frozen Broccoli Recalled Due to Positive Listeria Test
Alimentos Congelados, S.A. (Pinula) is recalling bagged frozen broccoli from 11 states after the Ohio Department of Agriculture tested and found positive a sample for Listeria monocytogenes.
The Wylwood brand is an exclusive brand of Save-A-Lot, a discount grocery chain. Alimentos Congelados is a Guatemalan company.
Frozen broccoli would be blanched prior to freezing, which should eliminate Listeria. The Listeria in this case would be post-process contamination. It is not know to us whether this product was packed overseas, never the less, it would be important for the processing facility to have an active Listeria control program. This product would generally be cooked by the consumer, which if done sufficiently, would eliminate the Listeria.
If imported product, then this should put attention on supplier control and that supplier's ability to control Listeria in the post-blanching environment with attention on eliminating sources of cross-contamination, practicing proper sanitation, and conducting monitoring.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm493849.htm
Alimentos Congelados, S.A. Recalls Frozen Broccoli Cuts Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
April 1, 2016
Contact
Consumers Consumer Affairs 1-800-888-4646
Announcement
View Product Photos
Alimentos Congelados, S.A. (Pinula) is voluntarily recalling 1,800 cases of Frozen Broccoli Cuts because it has the potential to be contaminated with Listeria Monocytogenes, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Although healthy individuals may suffer only short-term symptoms such as high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea, Listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women.
The Frozen Broccoli Cuts were distributed to stores in the following states: Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina and North Carolina.
The affected Frozen Broccoli Cuts were distributed in poly bags under the following label and code:
WYLWOOD Fresh Frozen Broccoli Cuts, NET WT. 16 OZ (1 LB), UPC 5193300110, with bag code: A25335P and A15335P
The company has not received any complaints in relation to this product and is not aware of any illnesses associated with the product to date.
The recall was the result of retail package of Frozen Broccoli Cuts being tested by the State of Ohio Department of Agriculture. The Frozen Broccoli Cuts had tested positive for Listeria Monocytogenes. The company has ceased distribution of Frozen Broccoli Cuts, and is fully cooperating with regulatory agencies.
Consumers who purchased the Frozen Broccoli Cuts are urged not to consume this product and throw it away. Consumers requiring refund or with questions can contact the company at 1-800-888-4646 and ask for Consumer Affairs Monday thru Friday between 8:00AM and 5:00 PM EST.
The Wylwood brand is an exclusive brand of Save-A-Lot, a discount grocery chain. Alimentos Congelados is a Guatemalan company.
Frozen broccoli would be blanched prior to freezing, which should eliminate Listeria. The Listeria in this case would be post-process contamination. It is not know to us whether this product was packed overseas, never the less, it would be important for the processing facility to have an active Listeria control program. This product would generally be cooked by the consumer, which if done sufficiently, would eliminate the Listeria.
If imported product, then this should put attention on supplier control and that supplier's ability to control Listeria in the post-blanching environment with attention on eliminating sources of cross-contamination, practicing proper sanitation, and conducting monitoring.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm493849.htm
Alimentos Congelados, S.A. Recalls Frozen Broccoli Cuts Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
April 1, 2016
Contact
Consumers Consumer Affairs 1-800-888-4646
Announcement
View Product Photos
Alimentos Congelados, S.A. (Pinula) is voluntarily recalling 1,800 cases of Frozen Broccoli Cuts because it has the potential to be contaminated with Listeria Monocytogenes, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Although healthy individuals may suffer only short-term symptoms such as high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea, Listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women.
The Frozen Broccoli Cuts were distributed to stores in the following states: Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, South Carolina and North Carolina.
The affected Frozen Broccoli Cuts were distributed in poly bags under the following label and code:
WYLWOOD Fresh Frozen Broccoli Cuts, NET WT. 16 OZ (1 LB), UPC 5193300110, with bag code: A25335P and A15335P
The company has not received any complaints in relation to this product and is not aware of any illnesses associated with the product to date.
The recall was the result of retail package of Frozen Broccoli Cuts being tested by the State of Ohio Department of Agriculture. The Frozen Broccoli Cuts had tested positive for Listeria Monocytogenes. The company has ceased distribution of Frozen Broccoli Cuts, and is fully cooperating with regulatory agencies.
Consumers who purchased the Frozen Broccoli Cuts are urged not to consume this product and throw it away. Consumers requiring refund or with questions can contact the company at 1-800-888-4646 and ask for Consumer Affairs Monday thru Friday between 8:00AM and 5:00 PM EST.
Friday, April 1, 2016
FDA Proposes Limit for Inorganic Arsenic in Infant Cereals
FDA has proposed a limit of 100 ppb of inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereal. The cereals that had been tested (400) were all within this limit.
The FDA found that inorganic arsenic exposure in infants and pregnant women can result in a child’s decreased performance on certain developmental tests that measure learning, based on epidemiological evidence including dietary exposures.
FDA Press Release
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm493740.htm
FDA proposes limit for inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereal
Agency releases new data and scientific assessment on arsenic in rice, provides advice for pregnant women and infants
For Immediate Release
April 1, 2016
The FDA found that inorganic arsenic exposure in infants and pregnant women can result in a child’s decreased performance on certain developmental tests that measure learning, based on epidemiological evidence including dietary exposures.
FDA Press Release
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm493740.htm
FDA proposes limit for inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereal
Agency releases new data and scientific assessment on arsenic in rice, provides advice for pregnant women and infants
For Immediate Release
April 1, 2016
Report on FDA Import Refusals
A report issued by USDA Economic Research Service on FDA import refusals shows that seafood, vegetables and fruits are the items that are most often rejected at port of entry. FDA physically inspects about 1% of food, but uses a risk based approach to hopefully best utilize its limited resources to focus on real issues.
Regarding food safety issues, we look to those products that were rejected due to adulteration. A few key points gleaned from the document:
- Violations for pathogen/toxin adulteration were highest for fishery and seafood products in both 1998-2004 and 2005-13. Spices, flavors, and salts had the second largest number of pathogen/toxin violations per year in 2005-13.
- The most frequent violation in 2005-13, by far, in the pathogen/toxin adulteration category was for the presence of Salmonella. The most Salmonella violations were in fishery and seafood products (42.0 percent of total), followed by spices, flavors, and salts (33.2 percent).
- Listeria was the second-most common violation for pathogen/toxin adulteration in 2005-13. Fishery and seafood products had 59.4 percent of Listeria violations. Listeria violations in cheese and cheese products fell to 32.0 percent.
- Vegetables/vegetable products. Almost three-quarters of these chemical violations were for unsafe pesticide residues Fruit/fruit products had the second-most violations per year for chemical adulteration in 2005-13.
Another interesting quote:
As the total volume of imported food has risen, the number of shipments refused has declined relative to the volume of food imports. This relative decline may reflect improvements in compliance with U.S. laws among foreign producers and importers, or it may reflect FDA’s limited resources and capacity to inspect, detain, and refuse imported food.
USDA ERS
Patterns in FDA Food Import Refusals Highlight Most Frequently Detected Problems
by John Bovay
March 28, 2016
How Clean is Your Deli's Meat Slicer?
A study published in MMWR shows that many deli operations may not be cleaning their slicer often enough and well enough. In this study, about half of the food operations contacted did not fully clean the slicer as frequently as they should. They noted that this is more the case at independent and smaller delis. Fully clean includes disassembly of the slicer before cleaning
The issue with not cleaning the slicer is that the slicer can be a point of cross contamination for Listeria monocytogenes. If Listeria contaminates the slicer, it can then contaminate all the meats that are sliced after that. According to the US Food Code, food contact surfaces in constant use should be fully cleaned at least every 4 hours. As the time between cleaning increases, the more opportunity Listeria has to grow.
Cleaning must include disassembly. If a slicer is just wiped down, Listeria can be present in the areas that were not cleaned, such as under the guard or down around the motor (where there may be higher temperatures). Never getting to spots on the slicer where foods particles build-up could mean that the slicer itself becomes a source for Listeria in that operation, not just a point of cross contact. It is important for establishment personnel to evaluate slicers to make sure there are no niches for food build-up.
Even is a slice is cleaned successfully, it is important that operators recognize that the slicer is not the ultimate source, but still can be a point of cross contamination. Important sources include:
The issue with not cleaning the slicer is that the slicer can be a point of cross contamination for Listeria monocytogenes. If Listeria contaminates the slicer, it can then contaminate all the meats that are sliced after that. According to the US Food Code, food contact surfaces in constant use should be fully cleaned at least every 4 hours. As the time between cleaning increases, the more opportunity Listeria has to grow.
Cleaning must include disassembly. If a slicer is just wiped down, Listeria can be present in the areas that were not cleaned, such as under the guard or down around the motor (where there may be higher temperatures). Never getting to spots on the slicer where foods particles build-up could mean that the slicer itself becomes a source for Listeria in that operation, not just a point of cross contact. It is important for establishment personnel to evaluate slicers to make sure there are no niches for food build-up.
Even is a slice is cleaned successfully, it is important that operators recognize that the slicer is not the ultimate source, but still can be a point of cross contamination. Important sources include:
- Deli cases - deli cases must be cleaned and properly maintained.
- Walk-in-coolers - also must be cleaned and properly maintained.
- Deli working environment - build-up of meat in the environment can result in high levels of Listeria in the operations, which increases the chance it can make its way to food contact surfaces including the slicer.
- Floor drains
- Sinks and wash areas
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
Retail Deli Slicer Cleaning Frequency — Six Selected Sites, United States, 2012
Weekly / April 1, 2016 / 65(12);306–310
Food Bank Recalls Canned Oranges Due To Leakage
The Pittsburgh Area Food Bank is recalling canned oranges due to leakage. While the product is within the stated shelf-life, it can be noted that the manufacturer has stated a three year shelf-life, which may be an error on the manufacturer's part. Acid foods in cans do not last long, and normally, the shelf-life is two years. The reason is that the acid will react with the can lining, and over time, it will get through to the steel base and rust through. This is especially the case with tin-lined cans (additionally, if tin lined, tin concentrations will increase). As cans begin to deteriorate, you will initially see a hydrogen swell...hydrogen gas is released as the acid reacts with the can. As the can swells, the ends will pop up. But once the acid eats through the can leading to a pinhole, the pressure will be release and the can may look normal.
Food banks will normally distribute product past the state shelf-life. For low acid canned foods, one to two years is normal. In many cases, those types of foods will last even longer (although the product will break down over time...unlike fine wines, canned foods do not get better over the years). But for acid foods, 6 months should be a limit past the life of the can. And in the example here, the cans did not even make it that long.
Other potential issues that could have resulted in leakage: A bad seam - a double seam (the seam that holds the lid to the body) can be out of specification leading to too little of overlap and thus a weak seal. Damage to the double seam - cuts into the double seam or dents to the double seam can also result in leakage. Headspace evacuation - If the air in the headspace was not properly evacuated with steam, residual oxygen could hasten can deterioration.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm493605.htm
Food Bank Recalls Canned Mandarin Oranges Due to Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
March 17, 2016
FDA Submitted Final Rule on Sanitary Transport of Food
The FDA has submitted the Final rule on the Sanitary Transport of Human and Animal Food. The rule should be expected to be available for us to review next week or soon after. Nothing more can really be said until it is made public.
Friday, March 25, 2016
CDC Updates Salmonella Outbreak Info on Raw Meal Organic Shake Product
CDC provided an update on an ongoing Salmonella outbreak linked to Garden of Life Raw Meal Organic Shake and Meal Products. there are now 27 cases in 20 states.
The company issued a recall on January 29, 2016 and then expanded the recall on February 12. The issue was stated to be a ingredient contamination issue, namely organic Moringa Leaf powder (moringa oleifera, is a plant that is native to northern India and is used for health benefits).
The company issued a recall on January 29, 2016 and then expanded the recall on February 12. The issue was stated to be a ingredient contamination issue, namely organic Moringa Leaf powder (moringa oleifera, is a plant that is native to northern India and is used for health benefits).
CDC Outbreak News
Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Virchow Infections Linked to Garden of Life RAW Meal Organic Shake & Meal Products
Baby Food Pouches Recalled Due to Packaging Defect
Gerber is recalling 2 lots of baby food in pouches due to the potential for leakage because of a defect in the packaging. The leakage could result in product spoilage. It appears that the packaging defect was noticed by the company and they then went and issued the recall.
The good thing is that this is a low pH (high acid) product. While it has some vegetable products in there, there is the addition of acid fruits and citric acid. Otherwise, if it were high pH (low acid), it could be a bigger risk..particularly from organisms like Clostridium botulinum.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm492260.htm
Gerber is Voluntarily Recalling Two Batches of GERBER® Organic 2ND FOODS® Pouches Due to a Packaging Defect That May Result in Product Spoilage
The good thing is that this is a low pH (high acid) product. While it has some vegetable products in there, there is the addition of acid fruits and citric acid. Otherwise, if it were high pH (low acid), it could be a bigger risk..particularly from organisms like Clostridium botulinum.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm492260.htm
Gerber is Voluntarily Recalling Two Batches of GERBER® Organic 2ND FOODS® Pouches Due to a Packaging Defect That May Result in Product Spoilage
Monday, March 21, 2016
Chipotle Hires Food Safety Expert, Back on Some Food Safety Initiatives
Chipotle's food safety issues make for a great case study. The company has finally hired a food safety expert (should have learned this from the Jack-in-the-Box E. coli Outbreak). Additionally, they are backing off on some of the corrective actions they stated they were going to implement. Some were probably not really needed or may have had too much impact on the quality of the product. But that is what happens when poop-hits-the-fan and a whole host of consultants are brought in to fix the situation.
Market Watch
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/chipotle-taps-ksu-professor-for-food-safety-post-2016-03-15-164853242
Chipotle taps KSU professor for food-safety post
By Jesse Newman
Published: Mar 15, 2016 4:32 p.m. ET
Market Watch
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/chipotle-taps-ksu-professor-for-food-safety-post-2016-03-15-164853242
Chipotle taps KSU professor for food-safety post
By Jesse Newman
Published: Mar 15, 2016 4:32 p.m. ET
Impact of Food Safety Issues on Chipotle Bigger than Expected
The impact of food safety issues on Chipotle have been much more than expected. They estimate that 7% of customers may never return. Then there are the "costs to address food safety, increased staffing needed to serve free food and the volume of fresh produce wasted due to lower traffic and testing were all higher than expected." Chipotle shares are still off 28% from last year.
Wall Street Journal
http://blogs.wsj.com/cfo/2016/03/17/chipotle-food-safety-problems-may-cost-it-up-to-7-of-customers-cfo/
Chipotle Food-Safety Problems May Cost It Up To 7% of Customers: CFO
1:13 pm ET
Mar 17, 2016
By Maxwell Murphy
Wall Street Journal
http://blogs.wsj.com/cfo/2016/03/17/chipotle-food-safety-problems-may-cost-it-up-to-7-of-customers-cfo/
Chipotle Food-Safety Problems May Cost It Up To 7% of Customers: CFO
1:13 pm ET
Mar 17, 2016
By Maxwell Murphy
Sunday, March 20, 2016
Canned tuna recalled due to under-processing issue
Bumble Bee and Chicken of the Sea 5oz canned tuna are both being recalled due to improper processing. The specific lot codes for each brand were produced in the same facility in Georgia. The situation may have resulted in under-processing thus leading to spoilage or pathogen growth, namely Clostridium botulinum, the causative agent of botulism. The issue was discovered during routine inspection.
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm491206.htm
Tri-Union Seafoods LLC Issues Precautionary, Voluntary Recall on Select 5 oz. Canned Chunk Light Tuna in Oil and 5 oz. Canned Chuck Light Tuna in Water
For Immediate Release
March 17, 2016
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm491206.htm
Tri-Union Seafoods LLC Issues Precautionary, Voluntary Recall on Select 5 oz. Canned Chunk Light Tuna in Oil and 5 oz. Canned Chuck Light Tuna in Water
For Immediate Release
March 17, 2016
Monday, March 14, 2016
Dietary Tea Product Recalled After Ingredient Tested Positive for Salmonella
An Arizona company is recalling its dietary powdered tea product after notification was received from their ingredient supplier of organic spinach powder had tested positive for Salmonella.
No illnesses have been reported.
So why is there spinach powder in tea?
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm490472.htm
Awareness Voluntary Recalls Boost Tea Due To Possible Salmonella Contamination
For Immediate Release
March 11, 2016
Contact
Consumers - Awareness Corp. (480) 615-3530 X556
Awareness Corp. of Mesa, AZ, is recalling its 7.4 ounce container of Boost Tea because it may be contaminated with Salmonella, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Healthy persons infected with Salmonella often experience fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. In rare circumstances, infection with Salmonella can result in the organism getting into the bloodstream area and producing more severe illnesses such as arterial infections, endocarditis and arthritis.
No illnesses have been reported.
So why is there spinach powder in tea?
FDA Recall Notice
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm490472.htm
Awareness Voluntary Recalls Boost Tea Due To Possible Salmonella Contamination
For Immediate Release
March 11, 2016
Contact
Consumers - Awareness Corp. (480) 615-3530 X556
Awareness Corp. of Mesa, AZ, is recalling its 7.4 ounce container of Boost Tea because it may be contaminated with Salmonella, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Healthy persons infected with Salmonella often experience fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. In rare circumstances, infection with Salmonella can result in the organism getting into the bloodstream area and producing more severe illnesses such as arterial infections, endocarditis and arthritis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)