FoodNet is a collaboration between CDC, USDA, FDA, and 10 state health departments that tracks infections caused by eight pathogens in a surveillance area that includes 16% of the U.S. population.
Personnel at each FoodNet site routinely communicate with clinical laboratories and collect detailed information about infections.
FoodNet conducts laboratory surveys, physician surveys, and population surveys to collect information about each of these steps. This information is used to calculate estimates of the actual number of people who become ill. Other information is used to estimate the proportion of these illnesses transmitted by food.
So how important is this if it only covers 16% of the population and it is used for determining estimates? Is limited funding better spent on developing the entire reporting system? I don't know, but it would be better if there was more information on how this is expected to impact food safety one way or the other.
https://www.food-safety.com/articles/10646-cdc-slashes-foodnet-surveillance-from-eight-foodborne-pathogens-to-two
CDC Slashes FoodNet Surveillance From Eight Foodborne Pathogens to TwoBy Bailee Henderson
August 26, 2025
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has made major cuts to its Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) surveillance program, citing inadequate funding.