FDA Proposes Laboratory Accreditation Program for Food Testing - Let the Arms Race Begin

FDA is proposing the establishment of a laboratory accreditation program for those testing food.  Testing by an approved laboratory would then be required in certain circumstances including:

• Testing conducted to comply with specific FDA testing requirements applied to address an identified or suspected food safety problem (including certain tests of shell eggs, bottled water, and sprouts);
• Testing conducted to provide evidence to support the admissibility of imported food into U.S. commerce (e.g., testing conducted for a food that has been detained due to an appearance of adulteration);
• Testing conducted to support the removal of a food from an import alert through successful consecutive testing;
• Testing conducted to address an identified or suspected food safety problem and presented to FDA as part of evidence for an informal hearing before a mandatory recall order, as part of a corrective action plan submitted after an order suspending the registration of a food facility, or as part of evidence submitted for an appeal of an administrative detention order;
• Testing conducted in response to a food testing order, a new procedure proposed by this rule to address an identified or suspected food safety problem.

Basically, FDA will not approve the laboratories, but will  recognize ABs (accreditation bodies), which will, in turn, accredit laboratories to conduct food testing in these circumstances.  "The proposed laboratory accreditation program would incorporate two globally recognized and widely used voluntary consensus standards, ISO/IEC 17011:2017 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017, as foundational requirements for ABs and laboratories, respectively. ABs and laboratories would also be required to meet certain additional requirements."

This always sounds like a good idea, but like so many other similar programs, it becomes a quagmire -  people with the inside track, unevenly applied standards, a scrutinous focus on paperwork, and an overwhelming desire of all laboratories to achieve that recognition.  Although the actual testing may not bring much money to a laboratory, having that accreditation is a great marketing tool....basically a stamp of approval from FDA.  And there will be issues with whether the laboratory has overall approval or approval for a given test(s)?

https://www.fda.gov/food/cfsan-constituent-updates/fda-publishes-proposed-rule-establish-laboratory-accreditation-program-food-testing
FDA Publishes Proposed Rule to Establish Laboratory Accreditation Program for Food Testing
Constituent update
November 1, 2019The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to establish a program for the testing of food by accredited laboratories as required by the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) as part of a proposed rule published today. The laboratory accreditation program, once established, will require testing of human and animal food in certain circumstances by accredited laboratories. Accredited laboratories would be required to follow model standards and would be subject to oversight by FDA-recognized accreditation bodies to help ensure consistently reliable testing results.

Currently, the FDA requires certain food testing, including environmental testing, to be conducted to help determine safety. The testing is largely completed by private laboratories that may conform to a variety of standards and be subject to various levels of oversight. Under the new proposed program, only laboratories accredited by an Accreditation Body (AB) recognized by the FDA will be able to conduct food testing in certain circumstances, which are outlined in the proposed rule. Further, the results will be required to be sent directly to the FDA by the accredited laboratories.

The following are circumstances that would require use of a laboratory accredited under this proposed rule:
Testing conducted to comply with specific FDA testing requirements applied to address an identified or suspected food safety problem (including certain tests of shell eggs, bottled water, and sprouts);
Testing conducted to provide evidence to support the admissibility of imported food into U.S. commerce (e.g., testing conducted for a food that has been detained due to an appearance of adulteration);
Testing conducted to support the removal of a food from an import alert through successful consecutive testing;
Testing conducted to address an identified or suspected food safety problem and presented to FDA as part of evidence for an informal hearing before a mandatory recall order, as part of a corrective action plan submitted after an order suspending the registration of a food facility, or as part of evidence submitted for an appeal of an administrative detention order;
Testing conducted in response to a food testing order, a new procedure proposed by this rule to address an identified or suspected food safety problem.

Under this rule, when finalized, the FDA will recognize ABs, which will, in turn, accredit laboratories to conduct food testing in these circumstances. The proposed rule outlines the procedures and standards that ABs and laboratories would need to follow to participate in the program, as well as procedures for how the FDA would manage and oversee the program.

The proposed laboratory accreditation program would incorporate two globally recognized and widely used voluntary consensus standards, ISO/IEC 17011:2017 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017, as foundational requirements for ABs and laboratories, respectively. ABs and laboratories would also be required to meet certain additional requirements.

The proposed laboratory accreditation program is intended to improve the accuracy and reliability of certain food testing through the uniformity of standards and enhanced oversight of participating laboratories.