In cooperation with the Taylor Farms recall of diced yellow onions that may be contaminated with Salmonella, 12 Haggen stores are voluntarily recalling deli products that contain raw Taylor Farms brand diced yellow onions
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm601753.htm
Twelve Haggen Stores Voluntarily Recall Select Deli Products in Cooperation with Taylor Farms’ Onion Recall Due to Possible Salmonella Contamination
For Immediate Release
March 17, 2018
Friday, March 23, 2018
Monday, March 19, 2018
Oregon Food Bank Recalls Two Additional Items That Were Shipped with Recalled Chia Seeds
The Oregon Food Bank is recalling pumpkin seed and nutritional yeast. This product was on the same shipment as chia seed that was recalled last week. That product was recalled due to the presence of mice poop.
The reason listed for these product was 'potential Listeria'.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm601536.htm
Oregon Food Bank Voluntarily Recalls Pumpkin Seeds Because Of Possible Contamination By Listeria Species
For Immediate Release
March 17, 2018
The reason listed for these product was 'potential Listeria'.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm601536.htm
Oregon Food Bank Voluntarily Recalls Pumpkin Seeds Because Of Possible Contamination By Listeria Species
For Immediate Release
March 17, 2018
Another Recall of Raw Beef Due to Contaminated Marinade Seasoning Mix
A second raw beef recall was issued because potentially contaminated Au Jus seasoning. SMI Holdings, Inc., doing business as Stampede Meat, Inc., a Bridgeview, Ill. establishment, is recalling approximately 484,800 pounds of beef products that may be contaminated with Salmonella. The raw beef products incorporated a non-meat ingredient, Au Jus Seasoning, which tested positive for the presence of Salmonella. Standard Meats, a TX established also recalled injected raw beef.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-023-2018-release
SMI Holdings, Inc Recalls Beef Products Due to Possible Salmonella Contamination
Class I Recall
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-023-2018-release
SMI Holdings, Inc Recalls Beef Products Due to Possible Salmonella Contamination
Class I Recall
023-2018
Health Risk: High
Health Risk: High
Mar 16, 2018
Friday, March 16, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Products - Week Ending 3/16/18
Mislabeled Cinnamon Rolls - A Seattle, WA firm is recalling 106 units of Gourmet Cream Cheese Cinnamon Rolls because it may contain undeclared Egg. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that the some of the Cinnamon Streusel Coffee Cake units, which contain egg, were mislabeled as Gourmet Cream Cheese Cinnamon Rolls. The Gourmet Cream Cheese Cinnamon Rolls labels do not list Egg in the label. [Labeling mistake]
Potential Allergen Carry-over Issue in Nuts A MN is voluntarily recalling various products roasted in their facility and sold in consumer packaging that may contain undeclared peanuts and various tree nuts. The recall was initiated after the potential for allergen cross-contact was identified during an inspection by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. The issue was caused by a breakdown in the company's production scheduling processes. Basically, they had carryover from product to product for every nut specific allergen - Peanuts, Almonds, Brazil Nuts, Cashews, Filberts, Macadamia Nuts, Pecans, Pistachios. [Scheduling and allergen clean out between products]
Wrong Sauce Packet - A NY retailer is recalling their Thai Sweet Chili Sauce Cup 1.5 oz. (UPC7-66630-98023) with a best-by of 7/4/18 or 7/5/18 because the product may contain undeclared egg. The recall was initiated because an employee in one store discovered that the incorrect sauce had been packaged and labeled incorrectly. [Incorrect addition of sauce packet]
Wrong Label on Alka-Seltzer - Bayer is voluntarily recalling select Alka-Seltzer Plus® packages because the ingredients on the front sticker may not match the actual product in the carton.
Wrong Cookies in the Cookie Bag - Chris’s Cookies has recalled one lot of its Trader Joe’s Chocolate Chip Cookie 12 Oz (340g) Bags (Barcode#: 0068 0752) after a report that Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies were discovered in a Chocolate Chip Cookie Bag, and therefore the product may contain undeclared peanuts. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that a bag labeled as Trader Joe’s Chocolate Chip Cookies instead contained Chocolate Chip Peanut Butter Cookies. While there is a warning statement on the label that the product may contain traces of peanuts, “peanuts” is not listed as an ingredient. [Wrong bags?]
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm600725.htm
Schwartz Brothers Bakery Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Egg in Gourmet Cream Cheese Cinnamon Rolls
For Immediate Release
March 12, 2018
Potential Allergen Carry-over Issue in Nuts A MN is voluntarily recalling various products roasted in their facility and sold in consumer packaging that may contain undeclared peanuts and various tree nuts. The recall was initiated after the potential for allergen cross-contact was identified during an inspection by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. The issue was caused by a breakdown in the company's production scheduling processes. Basically, they had carryover from product to product for every nut specific allergen - Peanuts, Almonds, Brazil Nuts, Cashews, Filberts, Macadamia Nuts, Pecans, Pistachios. [Scheduling and allergen clean out between products]
Wrong Sauce Packet - A NY retailer is recalling their Thai Sweet Chili Sauce Cup 1.5 oz. (UPC7-66630-98023) with a best-by of 7/4/18 or 7/5/18 because the product may contain undeclared egg. The recall was initiated because an employee in one store discovered that the incorrect sauce had been packaged and labeled incorrectly. [Incorrect addition of sauce packet]
Wrong Label on Alka-Seltzer - Bayer is voluntarily recalling select Alka-Seltzer Plus® packages because the ingredients on the front sticker may not match the actual product in the carton.
Wrong Cookies in the Cookie Bag - Chris’s Cookies has recalled one lot of its Trader Joe’s Chocolate Chip Cookie 12 Oz (340g) Bags (Barcode#: 0068 0752) after a report that Peanut Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies were discovered in a Chocolate Chip Cookie Bag, and therefore the product may contain undeclared peanuts. The recall was initiated after it was discovered that a bag labeled as Trader Joe’s Chocolate Chip Cookies instead contained Chocolate Chip Peanut Butter Cookies. While there is a warning statement on the label that the product may contain traces of peanuts, “peanuts” is not listed as an ingredient. [Wrong bags?]
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm600725.htm
Schwartz Brothers Bakery Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Egg in Gourmet Cream Cheese Cinnamon Rolls
For Immediate Release
March 12, 2018
Jury Verdict in Foster Farms Salmonella Case Awards Plaintiff, Recognizes Fault on Family
A jury verdict of $6.5 million in favor of a young boy who suffered brain injury due to Salmonella infection that was a part of the 2014 Foster Farms Salmonella outbreak.
Of this total of $6.5 million, only a 30% portion was assigned to Foster Farms. "The jury attributed 30 percent of the fault to Foster Farms and 70 percent to family members for their preparation of the chicken. The net verdict for the family was $1.95 million".
While Salmonella can be naturally present on poultry, the case against Foster Farms was that they did not do a good enough job in controlling Salmonella. In the outbreak, the issue was high levels of Salmonella in the chicken parts processing area.
http://www.meatpoultry.com/articles/news_home/Food_Safety/2018/03/Court_says_Foster_Farms_respon.aspx?ID=%7B69C9A99A-E7DF-4043-AB64-9B7223E8E632%7D
Court says Foster Farms responsible in Salmonella case
March 12, 2018 - by MEAT+POULTRY Staff
Study Analyses Consumer Decisions Involving Food Waste
A research report on consumer food waste drivers. Food waste is often portrayed as an issue which can easily be corrected, but from the consumer's perspective, what decisions go into throwing out food? "Some food waste analyses seem to treat household food waste as a “mistake” or careless decision; however, consumer decisions to waste also likely reflect trade-offs and economic incentives." This study finds that "food waste is a function of consumers’ demographic characteristics, and that decisions to discard food vary with contextual factors."
In the report, some interesting points are made.
In the report, some interesting points are made.
"In the case of meal leftovers, respondents were generally less likely to waste the leftovers when the meal cost was high, when there were leftovers for a whole meal, when there were no future meal plans, and when the meal was prepared at home."
"With milk, the decision to waste was heavily impacted by food safety considerations as reflected in the smell of the product. Not surprisingly, milk that smelled slightly sour was more likely to be thrown out than milk that smelled fine—signaling individuals’ aversion to consuming a product they believe could make them or their family members ill (Graham-Rowe, Jessop, and Sparks 2014; Neff, Spiker, and Truant 2015). However, a subset of consumers opted to throw out the milk even when it smelled fine. This may be due to the expiration date information given in the vignette. In all scenarios, the milk was one day past its expiration, which may have caused some consumers to throw it out regardless of sensory properties."
"With milk, the decision to waste was heavily impacted by food safety considerations as reflected in the smell of the product. Not surprisingly, milk that smelled slightly sour was more likely to be thrown out than milk that smelled fine—signaling individuals’ aversion to consuming a product they believe could make them or their family members ill (Graham-Rowe, Jessop, and Sparks 2014; Neff, Spiker, and Truant 2015). However, a subset of consumers opted to throw out the milk even when it smelled fine. This may be due to the expiration date information given in the vignette. In all scenarios, the milk was one day past its expiration, which may have caused some consumers to throw it out regardless of sensory properties."
"[We] found that younger individuals (18–44 years) were more likely to waste food than older consumers. Interestingly, this group was more likely to waste in contexts where a decision to waste was less intuitive—when the meal was higher-priced and when the milk smelled fine."
"[We] find that consumer segments respond differently to different decision attributes. As educational campaigns are identified as a critical solution in reducing food waste (Rethink Food Waste through Economics and Data 2016), understanding the heterogeneity in waste behaviors can enable policymakers or other advocacy groups to better target educational efforts to the households most susceptible for high levels of food waste."
One prominent factor is risk aversion regarding food safety. Rightfully so. People should not be made to feel they use food that is at a point where they feel the food is spoiled. Much focus has gone into what manufacturers do to extend the life of the product, rather then teaching people to be more thoughtful in using products before they get to the point where a decision has to be made.
PhysOrg
https://phys.org/news/2018-03-food-safe-decision.html#jC
Wasting food may be safe, reasonable decision for some, study says
March 15, 2018 by Brian Wallheimer, Purdue University
One prominent factor is risk aversion regarding food safety. Rightfully so. People should not be made to feel they use food that is at a point where they feel the food is spoiled. Much focus has gone into what manufacturers do to extend the life of the product, rather then teaching people to be more thoughtful in using products before they get to the point where a decision has to be made.
PhysOrg
https://phys.org/news/2018-03-food-safe-decision.html#jC
Wasting food may be safe, reasonable decision for some, study says
March 15, 2018 by Brian Wallheimer, Purdue University
Canada - Salmonella Outbreak Associated with Raw Breaded Chicken
The Canadian Public Health Agency announced that there have been 30 cases of Salmonella Enteritidis infection and this is being linked to raw breaded chicken breasts. At this point, the brand name of the product has not been released.
CISION
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/public-health-notice---outbreak-of-salmonella-infections-linked-to-poultry-including-frozen-raw-breaded-chicken-products-677002393.html
Public Health Notice - Outbreak of Salmonella infections linked to poultry, including frozen raw breaded chicken products
News provided by Public Health Agency of Canada
Mar 15, 2018, 16:55 ET
CISION
https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/public-health-notice---outbreak-of-salmonella-infections-linked-to-poultry-including-frozen-raw-breaded-chicken-products-677002393.html
Public Health Notice - Outbreak of Salmonella infections linked to poultry, including frozen raw breaded chicken products
News provided by Public Health Agency of Canada
Mar 15, 2018, 16:55 ET
Raw Meat Recalled After Injected Spice Marinade Determined to Contain Salmonella
Standard Meat Company, a Saginaw, Texas establishment, is recalling up to 53,154 pounds of raw beef products that may be contaminated with Salmonella, "The raw beef products incorporated a non-meat ingredient, Au Jus Seasoning, that was found positive for the presence of Salmonella. The problem was discovered when Standard Meat Company was notified by their supplier, who shipped the seasoning, of a voluntary seasoning recall based on Salmonella contamination. Standard Meat Company uses this seasoning product to formulate marinade that is injected into the top sirloin steaks."
So raw beef is being recalled because the spice used had Salmonella? Seems odd since beef may naturally have Salmonella, but a recall can be justified. 1) The spice is injected into the sirloin steaks which would put Salmonella, if present in the spice, into the interior of the meat, and as we know, people tend to think they can cook these sirloin steaks on the rare side. 2) The meat is sold frozen, and this increases the likelihood that a person will under cook it, especially when they insufficiently thaw the meat or don't thaw it at all.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-022-2018-release
Standard Meat Company Recalls Beef Products Due to Possible Salmonella Contamination
Class I Recall
022-2018
Health Risk: High
Mar 15, 2018
So raw beef is being recalled because the spice used had Salmonella? Seems odd since beef may naturally have Salmonella, but a recall can be justified. 1) The spice is injected into the sirloin steaks which would put Salmonella, if present in the spice, into the interior of the meat, and as we know, people tend to think they can cook these sirloin steaks on the rare side. 2) The meat is sold frozen, and this increases the likelihood that a person will under cook it, especially when they insufficiently thaw the meat or don't thaw it at all.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-022-2018-release
Standard Meat Company Recalls Beef Products Due to Possible Salmonella Contamination
Class I Recall
022-2018
Health Risk: High
Mar 15, 2018
Jalapeno Cheddar Smoked Sausage Recalled Due to Three Complaints for Green Hard Plastic Pieces
Johnsonville, LLC, a Sheboygan Falls, Wis. establishment, is recalling approximately 109,603 pounds of smoked pork sausage products that may be contaminated with extraneous materials. The problem was discovered after the firm received three consumer complaints for pieces of hard, green plastic identified in the sausage product. The recall is limited to one date code of the “JALAPEÑO CHEDDAR Smoked Sausage”.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-021-2018-release
Johnsonville, LLC Recalls Smoked Pork Sausage Products due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class I Recall
021-2018
Health Risk: High
Mar 15, 2018
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-021-2018-release
Johnsonville, LLC Recalls Smoked Pork Sausage Products due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class I Recall
021-2018
Health Risk: High
Mar 15, 2018
Tuesday, March 13, 2018
FDA Issues Warning for Cheese Sold at Farmers' Market Due to Listeria Potential
NY Ag issued a warning about raw goat milk cheese for potential Listeria contamination. "A routine sample of the cheese, taken by an inspector from the Division of Milk Control and Dairy Services on February 20, 2018, was subsequently tested by the New York State Food Laboratory and discovered to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. On February 23, 2018, the manufacturer was notified of a preliminary positive test result and voluntarily recalled the product from all their customers. Test results were confirmed on March 2, 2018. The cheese will be destroyed by the manufacturer." To date, there have been no reported illnesses.
This is not the first case of Listeria-in-cheese issue we have seen involving a small processor. NY has had several recalls and an associated outbreak over the past year or so. These cases should not incriminate all small cheese makers, however a trend of issues can be a drag on the entire industry sector. Therefore it behooves the industry to rise above the regulations rather then bemoan them. We need to do more than applaud small business, but recognize that there is risk and with that, the need for mitigation strategies, independent of the size of company. This includes strict sanitation practices and verification including monitoring. The excuse for inaction that these are 'just a small local producers' does no good when we find a owner with the best of intentions suddenly out of business, in court, with product responsible for someone's illness.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm600681.htm
Consumer Alert: Listeria Contamination In Maiden’s Creamery Wild Meadow Raw Goat Milk Cheese
For Immediate Release
March 12, 2018
This is not the first case of Listeria-in-cheese issue we have seen involving a small processor. NY has had several recalls and an associated outbreak over the past year or so. These cases should not incriminate all small cheese makers, however a trend of issues can be a drag on the entire industry sector. Therefore it behooves the industry to rise above the regulations rather then bemoan them. We need to do more than applaud small business, but recognize that there is risk and with that, the need for mitigation strategies, independent of the size of company. This includes strict sanitation practices and verification including monitoring. The excuse for inaction that these are 'just a small local producers' does no good when we find a owner with the best of intentions suddenly out of business, in court, with product responsible for someone's illness.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm600681.htm
Consumer Alert: Listeria Contamination In Maiden’s Creamery Wild Meadow Raw Goat Milk Cheese
For Immediate Release
March 12, 2018
Oregon Food Bank Recalls Chia Seeds After Rodent Droppings Discovered in Product
Oregon Food Bank of Portland is recalling chia seeds after it was discovered that there is the presence of rodent droppings. "The issue was discovered through investigation of a customer complaint regarding foreign material. Product which was still in inventory at Oregon Food Bank was determined to contain rodent droppings. Subsequent investigation indicates the chia seeds were observed to have evidence of rodent activity by the donor, Live Local Organic of Milwaukie, Oregon. The recall was initiated after it was determined all chia seeds received in this donation might be at risk."
Nasty.
Chia seeds, used as a thickening agent and added as a nutritional benefit to food, looks an awful lot like mouse dropping. although a bit smaller. (about 2mm for Chia vs up to 5mm for MD).
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm600756.htm
Oregon Food Bank Issues Alert on Foreign Material in Chia Seeds
For Immediate Release
March 12, 2018
Nasty.
Chia seeds, used as a thickening agent and added as a nutritional benefit to food, looks an awful lot like mouse dropping. although a bit smaller. (about 2mm for Chia vs up to 5mm for MD).
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm600756.htm
Oregon Food Bank Issues Alert on Foreign Material in Chia Seeds
For Immediate Release
March 12, 2018
Friday, March 9, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Product - Week Ending March 9, 2018
Limited Production Run Mislabeled - Ciolo Foods of Lafayette, CO has voluntarily recalled it’s 7-ounce containers of “Nut-Free Basil Pesto” because they contain undeclared tree nuts (Pine Nuts and Walnuts). The recall was initiated after discovery that some of this limited run of product was mislabeled. No other lots were affected by this issue. [Production labeling issue]
Contract Manufacturer Error - IDLife, LLC of Frisco, TX is voluntarily recalling its line of Protein Bars (Lot #s PR33471, PR31771, & PR31971), Snack Bars (Lot #s SN32071 & SN30771), and Kids Bars (Lot #s A3617-1 & 03047-1), because they may contain undeclared allergens. As part of its quality control review process, IDLife discovered that the lots of Protein Bars referenced above may contain undisclosed almonds, the lots of Snack Bars referenced above may contain undisclosed peanuts, and the lots of Kids Bars may contain undisclosed almonds and coconut oil. The recall was initiated after IDLife’s quality control team discovered a problem at the Company’s contract manufacturer for its bars. Subsequent investigation indicates the problem was caused by a temporary breakdown in the contract manufacturer’s quality control procedures.
Reaction to Improperly Listed Allergen - Kodiak Cakes of Park City, UT is recalling all lots and codes of Kodiak Cakes Blueberry Chia Energy Waffles 10.72 oz that were on shelf prior to March 5, 2018 because they contain undeclared milk. The improper labeling was discovered when a consumer notified Kodiak Cakes that a family member had a reaction to the product and that “milk” was not included in the allergen statement. While the specific ingredient “whey” is included in the ingredient declaration, the presence of milk is not identified in the ingredient list or declared in the allergen “contains” statement. [Label design issue]
Label Missing Allergens - Weis Markets today announced it has expanded its recall for its store-made Weis Quality Dried Beef Party Rye dip for failing to list egg and milk allergens on its label. The issue was discovered during a routine inspection. [Label design issue]
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm600120.htm
Ciolo Foods Issues Allergy Alert for Undeclared Tree Nuts in "Ciolo Nut-Free Basil"
For Immediate Release
March 7, 2018
Chicken Salad Salmonella Outbreak Cases Increases to 170
A Salmonella outbreak associated with chicken salad first announced in February, now has 170 cases according to the CDC news release. This is an increase of 105 cases. The most recent case began on February 18, so may be unlikely there are many more cases.
CDC Outbreak News Release
https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/typhimurium-02-18/index.html
Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium Linked to Chicken Salad
CDC Outbreak News Release
https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/typhimurium-02-18/index.html
Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium Linked to Chicken Salad
Recall Expanded After FDA Finds Additional Salmonella in Supplied Material
A California pet treat manufacturer is expanding their recall for products due to Salmonella. The initial recall, posted in February, was for one one of product. "Redbarn is expanding this recall to include all products manufactured from the raw material supplier of the first recalled product. We came to this decision after being notified that the FDA tested a different lot of raw material from this supplier at Redbarn and it tested positive for Salmonella."
Supplier control is more than providing a COA that product is clean, or even tests of the product. It is a program that provides sufficient confidence in the supplier's control of safety for the purchased materials. It encompasses a number of facets depending on the risk associated with that material, including an evaluation of that suppliers food safety systems (auditing, environmental monitoring, process control, etc) When FDA finds pathogen positive product in another lot of supplier product, this indicates the downstream customer did not have adequate systems in place to evaluate their supplier's systems. Testing is part of the system, but with low contamination levels, the likelihood of discovery is low.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm600124.htm
Redbarn Pet Products Expands Voluntary Recall of Dog Chews
For Immediate Release
March 6, 2018
Supplier control is more than providing a COA that product is clean, or even tests of the product. It is a program that provides sufficient confidence in the supplier's control of safety for the purchased materials. It encompasses a number of facets depending on the risk associated with that material, including an evaluation of that suppliers food safety systems (auditing, environmental monitoring, process control, etc) When FDA finds pathogen positive product in another lot of supplier product, this indicates the downstream customer did not have adequate systems in place to evaluate their supplier's systems. Testing is part of the system, but with low contamination levels, the likelihood of discovery is low.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm600124.htm
Redbarn Pet Products Expands Voluntary Recall of Dog Chews
For Immediate Release
March 6, 2018
Tuesday, March 6, 2018
Two, Check That, Three More Raw Pet Food Recalls, Will This Become a Weekly Thing?
Updated 3/7/18 - Three more 'raw' pet food recalls were announced by FDA. This is becoming a series of recalls related to raw pet foods.
One was kitten food, produced by Blue Ridge Beef of Eatonton, GA, that contained both Salmonella and Listeria. "This recall was initiated after the FDA received a complaint of two kitten deaths, including one death which was confirmed to be caused by Salmonella septicemia. Subsequent testing by the FDA of Kitten Grind Lot#GA1102 revealed the presence of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes." This product was a fresh refrigerated chub pack. On the company website is stated: "Protecting against bacteria, all of our facilities Utilize stainless steel equipment that is cleaned and sterilized between each product run and at the end of each day". But no validated kill step.
Steve’s Real Food , a Salt Lake City, Utah establishment, is recalling one lot of 5lb Raw Frozen Dog Food Turkey Canine Recipe due to Salmonella. "This recall is being initiated after the firm was notified by the Nebraska Department of Agriculture that a retail sample was collected and tested positive for Salmonella."
"Raw Basics, LLC. of Pleasant Prairie, WI is recalling 540lb of 5lb Pork-Bison Boxes because it has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella....... This recall is being issued after our firm was notified by the Nebraska Department of Agriculture of the positive Salmonella finding."
This is becoming a series of recalls for raw pet food. This past week, there were recalls for frozen chubs and two for freeze dried pet food. Others this year: 1 and 2. One would guess that FDA or the state laboratories could sample and test any of the raw products and find a positive for Salmonella, Listeria, Campylobacter, or even E. coli. It is also likely that any of the 'raw' pet foods has the risk of infection for the pet or its owner. It just seems crazy that regulatory effort has to be expended because people demand raw pet food. But once people become ill from foodborne illness due to raw pet food, whether that be through direct contact with the food, direct contact with the sick pet, or direct contact with the sick pet's fecal matter or vomit, it likely becomes a public concern.
Will this become a weekly thing to see raw pet food recalls? Easily if sampling is done.
For those who make raw pet foods, it is time to lace it up and prepare the recall procedures.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm599261.htm
Blue Ridge Beef Recalls Kitten Grind Raw Pet Food Lot#GA1102 Because of Possible Contamination
For Immediate Release
March 1, 2018
One was kitten food, produced by Blue Ridge Beef of Eatonton, GA, that contained both Salmonella and Listeria. "This recall was initiated after the FDA received a complaint of two kitten deaths, including one death which was confirmed to be caused by Salmonella septicemia. Subsequent testing by the FDA of Kitten Grind Lot#GA1102 revealed the presence of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes." This product was a fresh refrigerated chub pack. On the company website is stated: "Protecting against bacteria, all of our facilities Utilize stainless steel equipment that is cleaned and sterilized between each product run and at the end of each day". But no validated kill step.
"Raw Basics, LLC. of Pleasant Prairie, WI is recalling 540lb of 5lb Pork-Bison Boxes because it has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella....... This recall is being issued after our firm was notified by the Nebraska Department of Agriculture of the positive Salmonella finding."
This is becoming a series of recalls for raw pet food. This past week, there were recalls for frozen chubs and two for freeze dried pet food. Others this year: 1 and 2. One would guess that FDA or the state laboratories could sample and test any of the raw products and find a positive for Salmonella, Listeria, Campylobacter, or even E. coli. It is also likely that any of the 'raw' pet foods has the risk of infection for the pet or its owner. It just seems crazy that regulatory effort has to be expended because people demand raw pet food. But once people become ill from foodborne illness due to raw pet food, whether that be through direct contact with the food, direct contact with the sick pet, or direct contact with the sick pet's fecal matter or vomit, it likely becomes a public concern.
Will this become a weekly thing to see raw pet food recalls? Easily if sampling is done.
For those who make raw pet foods, it is time to lace it up and prepare the recall procedures.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm599261.htm
Blue Ridge Beef Recalls Kitten Grind Raw Pet Food Lot#GA1102 Because of Possible Contamination
For Immediate Release
March 1, 2018
Monday, March 5, 2018
CA Establishment Recalls RTE Processed Meat Products After Positive Listeria Test by CFIA
A California establishment is recalling close to 4,000 lbs of RTE processed meat products for potential Listeria contamination after product was tested and found to be positive by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. There have been no reported illnesses.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-018-2018-release
Olli Salumeria Americana Firm Recalls Ready-To-Eat Meat Products due to Possible Listeria Contamination
Class I Recall
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-018-2018-release
Olli Salumeria Americana Firm Recalls Ready-To-Eat Meat Products due to Possible Listeria Contamination
Class I Recall
018-2018
Health Risk: High
Health Risk: High
Mar 2, 2018
Oregon Meat Processor Recalling Ground Meat for Potential E. coli Contamination
A Clackamas, Ore. establishment, Interstate Meat Distributors, Inc., is recalling approximately 14,806 pounds of ground beef and pork products that may be contaminated with E. coli O157:H7. "The problem was discovered when the firm notified FSIS Inspection Program Personnel (IPP) that the firm’s sample of beef trim was positive for E. coli O157:H7 based on results by their third party lab. "
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-019-2018-release
Interstate Meat Distributors, Inc., Recalls Ground Beef and Pork Products due to Possible E. Coli O157:H7 Contamination
Class I Recall
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-019-2018-release
Interstate Meat Distributors, Inc., Recalls Ground Beef and Pork Products due to Possible E. Coli O157:H7 Contamination
Class I Recall
019-2018
Health Risk: High
Health Risk: High
Mar 3, 2018
South Africa - Meat Product Linked to Large Listeria Outbreak, 180 Deaths
Processed meat has been identified in South Africa's large Listeria outbreak. There have been 180 fatalities and 948 reported cases. The product polony, which is essentially bologna in South Africa, was produced by Enterprise Foods, a division of Tiger Brands. Enterprise Foods is pulling their products from teh retail shelf as well as Rainbow Chicken who also had a product test positive. People have been asked to return meat to store for refund and to thoroughly clean their refrigerators.
It is amazing it took as long as it did considering the number of cases that occurred since January.
It is amazing it took as long as it did considering the number of cases that occurred since January.
According to a quote in one news report, it appears the company had been testing product. "Muzi Kheswa of Scottsville said he couldn’t understand how the listeria got past quality control for such a long time, adding: “From my knowledge, all batches of food are supposed to be tested before being put onto the market. If that was done surely a contaminated batch would be positive for listeria and not sold to the public.”
Reuters
https://af.reuters.com/article/commodities07News/idAFL5N1QM0Q3
UPDATE 1-South Africa traces deadly listeria to processed meat, issues recall
March 4, 2018 / 11:36 AM
Reuters Staf
* Outbreak killed 180 people since January 2017
* Source identified as brand of processed cold meat
* Products recalled, consumers told to avoid ready-to-eat meat (Adds RCL comment)
By James Macharia
Reuters
https://af.reuters.com/article/commodities07News/idAFL5N1QM0Q3
UPDATE 1-South Africa traces deadly listeria to processed meat, issues recall
March 4, 2018 / 11:36 AM
Reuters Staf
* Outbreak killed 180 people since January 2017
* Source identified as brand of processed cold meat
* Products recalled, consumers told to avoid ready-to-eat meat (Adds RCL comment)
By James Macharia
Friday, March 2, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Product - Week Ending March 2, 2018
Consumer Complaint For Milk Issue - a Waelder, Texas establishment is recalling approximately 4,050 pounds of chicken sausage products due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen, milk, which is not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered when the firm received a customer complaint.
Incorrect Design - The Double Cola Company is recalling approximately 200 cases of its Cherry SKI product because they are incorrectly labeled. Only the Cherry SKI products with the new design are being recalled, which were delivered to the southern Illinois, Eva
Inspectors Find Labels Missing Alergens - A Lititz, Pa. establishment is recalling approximately 1,925 pounds of turkey sausage products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens - wheat and soy, known allergens, which are not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered by FSIS inspection personnel during routine inspection activities.
Peanut Allergen Found by Government Lab - LOTTE Int’l America Corp. located in Los Angeles, CA is recalling its 1.48-ounce packages of "Kancho Choco Biscuit" manufactured by LOTTE Confectionery Co. Ltd. Korea because of findings of small amounts of peanut in the product and no peanut declaration. LOTTE Int’l America Corp discovered this fact through lab test result done by CFIA and notified manufacturer and all customers right away about this discovery. [Cross contamination issue or ingredient issue]
Gnocchi Label Misses Dairy - La Pasta Inc. of Silver Spring, Maryland is recalling the private label Potato Gnocchi manufactured for Heinen’s supermarkets because it may contain undeclared milk. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume this product. This voluntary recall was initiated due to a consumer reporting feeling ill after consuming the Heinen’s Potato Gnocchi. Company officials compared packaging with approved recipe and confirmed that product did contain MILK as part of the recipe formula but was not declared on the label. [Label creation and approval error]
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-016-2018-release
J Bar B Foods Recalls Chicken Sausage Products due to Misbranding and an Undeclared Allergen
Incorrect Design - The Double Cola Company is recalling approximately 200 cases of its Cherry SKI product because they are incorrectly labeled. Only the Cherry SKI products with the new design are being recalled, which were delivered to the southern Illinois, Eva
Inspectors Find Labels Missing Alergens - A Lititz, Pa. establishment is recalling approximately 1,925 pounds of turkey sausage products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens - wheat and soy, known allergens, which are not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered by FSIS inspection personnel during routine inspection activities.
Gnocchi Label Misses Dairy - La Pasta Inc. of Silver Spring, Maryland is recalling the private label Potato Gnocchi manufactured for Heinen’s supermarkets because it may contain undeclared milk. People who have an allergy or severe sensitivity to milk run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction if they consume this product. This voluntary recall was initiated due to a consumer reporting feeling ill after consuming the Heinen’s Potato Gnocchi. Company officials compared packaging with approved recipe and confirmed that product did contain MILK as part of the recipe formula but was not declared on the label. [Label creation and approval error]
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-016-2018-release
J Bar B Foods Recalls Chicken Sausage Products due to Misbranding and an Undeclared Allergen
MMWR - 2017 Trichinellosis Outbreak Linked to Raw Pork From Home-Raised Swine
CDC's MMWR covers a 2017 trichinellosis outbreak where ten confirmed and two probable cases of trichinellosis occurred after eating raw pork from home-raised swine. While swine were the primary source of cases pre-1950's, most cases today are related to wild game, specifically bear meat. This outbreak linked to home-raised swine
According to the report, "The caretaker of the source farm could not be reached, but the event host who owns the farm reported that the caretaker purchased the pig from a private farm at age 5 weeks, raised it in an outdoor, fenced pen, and slaughtered it with the farm owner at age 2.5 years. The farm owner stated there are several pigs being raised on the farm, and the swine are only given commercial feed and never cooked or uncooked meat, offal, or garbage. The farm owner denied any rodent infestation issues on the farm but did state that small animals such as chicks had occasionally gotten into the fenced pen and been eaten by the pigs, indicating that small mammals infected with Trichinella could have entered the pen and been consumed by the swine."
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6708a3.htm?s_cid=mm6708a3_e
Trichinellosis Outbreak Linked to Consumption of Privately Raised Raw Boar Meat — California, 2017
Weekly / March 2, 2018 / 67(8);247–249
According to the report, "The caretaker of the source farm could not be reached, but the event host who owns the farm reported that the caretaker purchased the pig from a private farm at age 5 weeks, raised it in an outdoor, fenced pen, and slaughtered it with the farm owner at age 2.5 years. The farm owner stated there are several pigs being raised on the farm, and the swine are only given commercial feed and never cooked or uncooked meat, offal, or garbage. The farm owner denied any rodent infestation issues on the farm but did state that small animals such as chicks had occasionally gotten into the fenced pen and been eaten by the pigs, indicating that small mammals infected with Trichinella could have entered the pen and been consumed by the swine."
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/mm6708a3.htm?s_cid=mm6708a3_e
Trichinellosis Outbreak Linked to Consumption of Privately Raised Raw Boar Meat — California, 2017
Weekly / March 2, 2018 / 67(8);247–249
Frozen Chubs of Dog Food Recalled for Listeria
Northwest Naturals of Portland, Oregon is recalling 5lb frozen Chicken and Salmon pet food chubs because it has the potential to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes after testing done on one chub of product found Listeria.
According to the report. "The company was notified on 2-21-2018 by FDA and the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD). MDARD bought 1 chub at a Michigan specialty pet store and tested the sample which was negative for e coli, salmonella, and positive for Listeria moncytogenes. The company tests all batches of products for all pathogens in a positive release program before releasing for shipping. The company tests over 600 batches of product per week."
According to the company's website, they process the chubs with HPP (high pressure processing), although they state that it is done for poultry. (But what about the other meat varieties?) So was the high pressure processing insufficient to eliminate the Listeria?
"Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) can affect animals eating the product. There is the possibility of risk to humans from handling product that is positive for Listeria monocytogenes especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after and if they have made contact with the product or any surfaces exposed to the product."
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm598158.htm
Updated - Northwest Naturals Voluntarily Recalls 5lb Frozen Chicken and Salmon Pet Food Chubs Because of Possible Listeria Monocytogenes Health Risk
For Immediate Release
February 27, 2018
According to the report. "The company was notified on 2-21-2018 by FDA and the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD). MDARD bought 1 chub at a Michigan specialty pet store and tested the sample which was negative for e coli, salmonella, and positive for Listeria moncytogenes. The company tests all batches of products for all pathogens in a positive release program before releasing for shipping. The company tests over 600 batches of product per week."
According to the company's website, they process the chubs with HPP (high pressure processing), although they state that it is done for poultry. (But what about the other meat varieties?) So was the high pressure processing insufficient to eliminate the Listeria?
"Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) can affect animals eating the product. There is the possibility of risk to humans from handling product that is positive for Listeria monocytogenes especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after and if they have made contact with the product or any surfaces exposed to the product."
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm598158.htm
Updated - Northwest Naturals Voluntarily Recalls 5lb Frozen Chicken and Salmon Pet Food Chubs Because of Possible Listeria Monocytogenes Health Risk
For Immediate Release
February 27, 2018
Monday, February 26, 2018
Raw, Freeze-Dried Pet Food Recalled for Salmonella
Two recalls for raw, freeze-dried pet food were posted on FDA's Recall website.
Without a validated kill step, Salmonella will survive the freeze drying process just nicely. One could imagine that the freeze dried product would appear similar to dry product, so the potential for the pet owner handling it directly is probably high, and along with that, that chance of becoming infected. And the pooch can also become infected....increasing the chances of poopage in places where you don't want it to be.
- Carnivore Meat Company of Green Bay, WI, is voluntarily recalling a limited amount, 73 cases, of “Vital Essentials Freeze-Dried Beef Nibblets Entrée for Dogs” pet food because the products have the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella.
- TruPet, LLC of Milford, OH, is voluntarily recalling a limited amount of Treat Me Crunchy Beef Delight, 2.5oz Pet treats because the products have the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella. The recall includes only the product listed below.
Without a validated kill step, Salmonella will survive the freeze drying process just nicely. One could imagine that the freeze dried product would appear similar to dry product, so the potential for the pet owner handling it directly is probably high, and along with that, that chance of becoming infected. And the pooch can also become infected....increasing the chances of poopage in places where you don't want it to be.
Besides, Champy doesn't want raw pet treats...he doesn't even know what that is. He is fine with products that have a validated process.....aged cheddar cheese, beef jerky, summer sausage, grilled pork chops, etc. Ask him...Champy, you want a snack [with a validated process]? Absolutely.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm598255.htm
Carnivore Meat Company Issues Voluntary Recall of “Vital Essentials Freeze-Dried Beef Nibblets Entrée for Dogs” Pet Food
For Immediate Release
February 24, 2018
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm598255.htm
Carnivore Meat Company Issues Voluntary Recall of “Vital Essentials Freeze-Dried Beef Nibblets Entrée for Dogs” Pet Food
For Immediate Release
February 24, 2018
Friday, February 23, 2018
FDA Release Initial Pathogen Survey Results for Herbs and Guacamole
FDA is in the process of conducting a survey of microbiological pathogens on fresh cilantro, parsley and basil, as well as processed avocado and guacamole. While FDA has only sampled less a small percentage of the samples they plan to get (less than 12% or so of total samples planned), they do have some results for samples taken as of 1/1/18.
Fresh herbs
35 domestic samples - None of the domestic samples tested positive for Salmonella, or E. coli STED
Proccessed avocado/guacamole
Fresh herbs
35 domestic samples - None of the domestic samples tested positive for Salmonella, or E. coli STED
104 import samples - 4 tested positive for Salmonella, 3 tested positive for Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, and none tested positive for E. coli 0157:H7.
(It is important to point out that most of the outbreaks associated with these items - 7 of 9 - have been due to Cyclospora. FDA indicated that they will survey for Cyclospora in the summer months when there is a higher tendency for this to be an issue.
Proccessed avocado/guacamole
58 domestic samples - 3 tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes
49 import samples - 1 tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes.
Not much to worry about when eating your chips and dip at happy hour.....
Constituent Update
https://www.fda.gov/Food/NewsEvents/ConstituentUpdates/ucm597356.htm
FDA Sampling Fresh Herbs, Guacamole and Processed Avocado
February 23, 2018
Not much to worry about when eating your chips and dip at happy hour.....
Constituent Update
https://www.fda.gov/Food/NewsEvents/ConstituentUpdates/ucm597356.htm
FDA Sampling Fresh Herbs, Guacamole and Processed Avocado
February 23, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Product - Week Ending 2/23/18
A Cheyenne, WY establishment is voluntarily recalling Tuscan Kale Pesto mislabeled with Artichoke & Garlic labels because the labels do not declare tree nuts (cashews). The recall was initiated after Seggiano USA, Inc. was notified of a mislabeled product by a sales agent who saw the product on a retail shelf. [Pesto often has nuts, usually pine nuts, in the formulation. So this would be a label creation / approval error]
Emerald® Nuts is initiating a voluntary recall for a limited amount of its 6.5oz Glazed Walnuts product, distributed nationwide, due to the potential presence of undeclared peanuts, almonds, cashews and pecans in the product. Recall was initiated after receiving consumer complaints. [Cross contact issue, likely from carryover from previous run indicating improper clean out / sanitation or mishandling error, or even dust flow movement. A good reminder that nut allergens are not the same. While people who are allergic to one may not be allergic to all. By regulation, nuts must be treated as separate allergens, and the specific nut must be on the label]
Market of Choice of Eugene, Oregon is recalling Sezam Kale Salad because it may contain undeclared EGG. This recall was initiated after it was discovered that Sezam Kale Salad dressing containing EGG but label did not reveal the presence of EGG. [This is an print-on-demand label for product sold in grocery stores, so this would be a error when inputting the information into the printer, specifically regarding the salad dressing component]
Sunneen Health Foods is voluntarily recalling mislabeled Whole Foods Market Vegan Buffalo Chicken Bites sold at 13 Whole Foods Market stores in New York and New Jersey because the products contained tree nut (pecan) allergens that were not listed on the product label. The issue was discovered at the distribution center. [label creation / approval error]
A Buda, Texas establishment, is recalling approximately 167 pounds of frozen beef patty and gravy products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens - the product contains milk which is not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered on Feb. 19, 2018 when FSIS was notified that the firm received two consumer complaints of mislabeled products. The cartons actually contain beef patties, mashed potatoes and cheese [cheese being the item actually part of the product but not on the label....so probably someone grabbed the wrong cartons.].
A Corona, N.Y. establishment, is recalling approximately 572 pounds of frozen pork and shrimp dumpling products due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen - the product contains egg which is not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered on Feb. 20, 2018 during routine FSIS label verification activities. The dumpling wrapper ingredient label includes pasteurized liquid whole eggs and egg whites in the list of ingredients; however, the finished product label does not declare egg. [label creation / approval error]
La Pasta Inc. of Silver Spring, Maryland is recalling the private label Potato Gnocchi manufactured for Heinen’s supermarkets because it may contain undeclared milk. This voluntary recall was initiated due to a consumer reporting feeling ill after consuming the Heinen’s Potato Gnocchi. Company officials compared packaging with approved recipe and confirmed that product did contain MILK as part of the recipe formula but was not declared on the label. [label creation / approval error]
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm597927.htm
Seggiano USA, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Tree Nuts
For Immediate Release
February 22, 2018
Emerald® Nuts is initiating a voluntary recall for a limited amount of its 6.5oz Glazed Walnuts product, distributed nationwide, due to the potential presence of undeclared peanuts, almonds, cashews and pecans in the product. Recall was initiated after receiving consumer complaints. [Cross contact issue, likely from carryover from previous run indicating improper clean out / sanitation or mishandling error, or even dust flow movement. A good reminder that nut allergens are not the same. While people who are allergic to one may not be allergic to all. By regulation, nuts must be treated as separate allergens, and the specific nut must be on the label]
Market of Choice of Eugene, Oregon is recalling Sezam Kale Salad because it may contain undeclared EGG. This recall was initiated after it was discovered that Sezam Kale Salad dressing containing EGG but label did not reveal the presence of EGG. [This is an print-on-demand label for product sold in grocery stores, so this would be a error when inputting the information into the printer, specifically regarding the salad dressing component]
Sunneen Health Foods is voluntarily recalling mislabeled Whole Foods Market Vegan Buffalo Chicken Bites sold at 13 Whole Foods Market stores in New York and New Jersey because the products contained tree nut (pecan) allergens that were not listed on the product label. The issue was discovered at the distribution center. [label creation / approval error]
A Buda, Texas establishment, is recalling approximately 167 pounds of frozen beef patty and gravy products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens - the product contains milk which is not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered on Feb. 19, 2018 when FSIS was notified that the firm received two consumer complaints of mislabeled products. The cartons actually contain beef patties, mashed potatoes and cheese [cheese being the item actually part of the product but not on the label....so probably someone grabbed the wrong cartons.].
A Corona, N.Y. establishment, is recalling approximately 572 pounds of frozen pork and shrimp dumpling products due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen - the product contains egg which is not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered on Feb. 20, 2018 during routine FSIS label verification activities. The dumpling wrapper ingredient label includes pasteurized liquid whole eggs and egg whites in the list of ingredients; however, the finished product label does not declare egg. [label creation / approval error]
La Pasta Inc. of Silver Spring, Maryland is recalling the private label Potato Gnocchi manufactured for Heinen’s supermarkets because it may contain undeclared milk. This voluntary recall was initiated due to a consumer reporting feeling ill after consuming the Heinen’s Potato Gnocchi. Company officials compared packaging with approved recipe and confirmed that product did contain MILK as part of the recipe formula but was not declared on the label. [label creation / approval error]
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm597927.htm
Seggiano USA, Inc. Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Tree Nuts
For Immediate Release
February 22, 2018
Wednesday, February 21, 2018
Iowa Salmonella Outbreak Associated with Chicken Salad Update - 115 Reported Cases
There are now 115 reported cases of Salmonella infection associated with chicken salad sold through Fareway grocers. The issue was first reported last week, but little details were provided. Now it is being reported that the "chicken salad was prepared by Triple T Specialty Meats in Ackley, which made the product solely for Fareway stores."
There have been no clear causes for the issue at this point.
The producer, Triple T, seems to be a legitimate operation. According to their website, the company started a butcher shop over 20 years ago and has expanded into a number of different product offerings.
Des Moines Register
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/news/
Salmonella-tainted chicken salad made by Ackley plant tied to 115 illnesses
Tony Leys, tleys@dmreg.comPublished 4:32 p.m. CT
There have been no clear causes for the issue at this point.
The producer, Triple T, seems to be a legitimate operation. According to their website, the company started a butcher shop over 20 years ago and has expanded into a number of different product offerings.
Des Moines Register
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/news/
Salmonella-tainted chicken salad made by Ackley plant tied to 115 illnesses
Tony Leys, tleys@dmreg.comPublished 4:32 p.m. CT
Feb. 20, 2018
Salmonella Outbreak Associated with the Controversial Botanical Kratom.....FDA Encourages Destruction of All Kratom Containing Supplements
The FDA and CDC along with state and local officials are investigating a multistate outbreak of Salmonella infections linked to products reportedly containing kratom. The rare strain of Salmonella has infected 28 people in 20 states with eleven of the people hospitalized.
The FDA later announced the voluntary destruction and recall of a large volume of kratom-containing dietary supplements manufactured and distributed nationwide under the brand names Botany Bay, Enhance Your Life and Divinity by Divinity Products Distribution of Grain Valley, Missouri. In cooperation with the FDA, the company has also agreed to stop selling all products containing kratom. "Based on the scientific evidence of the serious risks associated with the use of kratom, in the interest of public health, the FDA encourages all companies currently involved in the sale of products containing kratom intended for human consumption to take similar steps to take their products off the market and submit any necessary evidence, as appropriate, to the FDA to evaluate them based on the applicable regulatory pathway."
Kratom, (Mitragyna speciosa) is a plant that grows naturally in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Papua New Guinea that is used as herb to provide relief from pain, depression and anxiety. But according to FDA, "evidence shows that kratom has similar effects to narcotics like opioids, and carries similar risks of abuse, addiction and in some cases, death. Thus, it’s not surprising that often kratom is taken recreationally by users for its euphoric effects. At a time when we have hit a critical point in the opioid epidemic, the increasing use of kratom as an alternative or adjunct to opioid use is extremely concerning."
The FDA later announced the voluntary destruction and recall of a large volume of kratom-containing dietary supplements manufactured and distributed nationwide under the brand names Botany Bay, Enhance Your Life and Divinity by Divinity Products Distribution of Grain Valley, Missouri. In cooperation with the FDA, the company has also agreed to stop selling all products containing kratom. "Based on the scientific evidence of the serious risks associated with the use of kratom, in the interest of public health, the FDA encourages all companies currently involved in the sale of products containing kratom intended for human consumption to take similar steps to take their products off the market and submit any necessary evidence, as appropriate, to the FDA to evaluate them based on the applicable regulatory pathway."
Kratom, (Mitragyna speciosa) is a plant that grows naturally in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Papua New Guinea that is used as herb to provide relief from pain, depression and anxiety. But according to FDA, "evidence shows that kratom has similar effects to narcotics like opioids, and carries similar risks of abuse, addiction and in some cases, death. Thus, it’s not surprising that often kratom is taken recreationally by users for its euphoric effects. At a time when we have hit a critical point in the opioid epidemic, the increasing use of kratom as an alternative or adjunct to opioid use is extremely concerning."
According to the FDA, they aware of reports of 36 deaths associated with the use of misuse of kratom-containing products. So to what degree will people using this as a recreational mood enhancer worry about a Salmonella issue?
FDA Alert
https://www.fda.gov/Food/NewsEvents/ConstituentUpdates/ucm597415.htm
FDA Investigates Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Infections Linked to Products Reported to Contain Kratom
February 20, 2018
FDA Alert
https://www.fda.gov/Food/NewsEvents/ConstituentUpdates/ucm597415.htm
FDA Investigates Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Infections Linked to Products Reported to Contain Kratom
February 20, 2018
Tuesday, February 20, 2018
Challenges of Maintaining Gluten-Free Levels in Non-Gluten Containing Crops
A recently published study looks at the determination of gluten in gluten-free oats, and other grains, seeds, beans, pulses, and legumes. For food to be considered gluten free, the level set by US regulation is 20 ppm. There can be a problem with cross contact into other non-gluten crops especially oats. Oats are grown in overlapping regions and are seeded and harvested in the similar time frame. It is interesting to consider the difficulty in ensuring gluten-free status back to the crops and initial processing steps.
"Processors who intentionally produce gluten free grain ingredients for food manufacturers must take additional steps to ensure that their products are appropriate for gluten free consumers. These steps can include controls during growing, harvesting, transport, storage, and processing. Once these additional steps are taken, the processor must be able to demonstrate that the resulting ingredient meets the requirements for gluten free labeling according to the country of sale or other applicable regulations."
Whole grains can be a challenge for testing and setting a ppm limit. This study evaluated a visual method for determining the feasibility of the limit in oat processing facilities.
Journal of AOAC Interntational
https://www.gluten.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Oat-Study.pdf
The Use of Visual Examination for Determining the Presence of Gluten-Containing Grains in Gluten Free Oats and Other Grains, Seeds, Beans, Pulses, and Legumes
"Processors who intentionally produce gluten free grain ingredients for food manufacturers must take additional steps to ensure that their products are appropriate for gluten free consumers. These steps can include controls during growing, harvesting, transport, storage, and processing. Once these additional steps are taken, the processor must be able to demonstrate that the resulting ingredient meets the requirements for gluten free labeling according to the country of sale or other applicable regulations."
Whole grains can be a challenge for testing and setting a ppm limit. This study evaluated a visual method for determining the feasibility of the limit in oat processing facilities.
Journal of AOAC Interntational
https://www.gluten.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Oat-Study.pdf
The Use of Visual Examination for Determining the Presence of Gluten-Containing Grains in Gluten Free Oats and Other Grains, Seeds, Beans, Pulses, and Legumes
Monday, February 19, 2018
Canned Dog Foods Recalled for Potential Low Level Pentobarbital
FDA issued a health alert for pets regarding canned dog foods made by J.M. Smucker, including. Gravy Train, Kibbles ‘N Bits, Ol’ Roy, and Skippy brands, due to the potential for pentobarbital contamination. The company is withdrawing all lots of these products that were manufactured from 2016 through the present. According to the report, "The FDA’s preliminary evaluation of the testing results of Gravy Train samples indicates that the low level of pentobarbital present in the withdrawn products is unlikely to pose a health risk to pets. However, pentobarbital should never be present in pet food and products containing any amount of pentobarbital are considered to be adulterated."
"Pentobarbital is a barbiturate drug that is most commonly used in animals as a sedative, anesthetic, or for euthanasia. Pets that eat pet food containing pentobarbital can experience drowsiness, dizziness, excitement, loss of balance, nausea, nystagmus (eyes moving back and forth in a jerky manner) and inability to stand. Consuming high levels of pentobarbital can cause coma and death. However, pentobarbital present in the withdrawn products is at a low level unlikely to pose a health risk to pets."
https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/NewsEvents/ucm597135.htm
FDA Alerts Pet Owners About Potential Pentobarbital Contamination in Canned Dog Food Manufactured by The J.M. Smucker Company, Including Certain Gravy Train, Kibbles ‘N Bits, Ol’ Roy, and Skippy Products
February 16, 2018
"Pentobarbital is a barbiturate drug that is most commonly used in animals as a sedative, anesthetic, or for euthanasia. Pets that eat pet food containing pentobarbital can experience drowsiness, dizziness, excitement, loss of balance, nausea, nystagmus (eyes moving back and forth in a jerky manner) and inability to stand. Consuming high levels of pentobarbital can cause coma and death. However, pentobarbital present in the withdrawn products is at a low level unlikely to pose a health risk to pets."
https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/NewsEvents/ucm597135.htm
FDA Alerts Pet Owners About Potential Pentobarbital Contamination in Canned Dog Food Manufactured by The J.M. Smucker Company, Including Certain Gravy Train, Kibbles ‘N Bits, Ol’ Roy, and Skippy Products
February 16, 2018
RTE Chicken Patties Recalled for Foreign Matter, Rubber
Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., a Waco, Texas establishment, is recalling approximately 101,310 pounds of ready-to-eat breaded chicken patties that may be contaminated with extraneous materials, specifically rubber. According to the notice, "The problem was discovered after the firm received a customer complaint on Feb. 13, 2018. Pilgrim's Pride distributed the product to institutions, including schools. Although the product was sold through the USDA commodity program, the introduction of the foreign material was due to an equipment failure at the facility. "
That is a heck of a lot of chicken to be wasted due to a maintenance issue.
USDA Recall Notice
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-011-2018-release
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Recalls Ready-to-Eat Chicken Products due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class I Recall
USDA Recall Notice
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-011-2018-release
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation Recalls Ready-to-Eat Chicken Products due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class I Recall
011-2018
Health Risk: High
Health Risk: High
Feb 16, 2018
Friday, February 16, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Product - Week ending Feb 16, 2018
Missing Egg on Label - Saker ShopRites, Inc., a Linden, N.J. establishment, is recalling approximately 19,757 pounds of pork and chicken empanadas due to misbranding and an undeclared allergen - the products contain egg, a known allergen, which is not listed in the ingredient statement on the label. The problem was discovered by FSIS personnel during routine label verification activities.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-010-2018-release
Saker ShopRites, Inc. Recalls Empanadas due to Misbranding and an Undeclared Allergen
Class I Recall
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-010-2018-release
Saker ShopRites, Inc. Recalls Empanadas due to Misbranding and an Undeclared Allergen
Class I Recall
010-2018
Health Risk: High
Feb 14, 2018
Health Risk: High
Feb 14, 2018
Imported Foods and the FSMA Foreign Verification Program Rule (FSVP)
The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), signed into law in 2011, was designed to improve public health by strengthening the food safety system. The law provided authority to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to write and enforce regulations that focus on preventing food safety issues. The law also directs FDA to enforce food safety standards for foods imported from other countries, with the intent that these foods meet the same safety standards as those grown or processed in the U.S. FDA regulated foods that are grown, manufactured, or processed outside the U.S. are therefore covered under several FSMA regulations including the Produce Safety Rule, the Preventive Controls for Human Foods Rule, and the Preventive Controls for Animal Foods Rule. The Foreign Verification Program Rule (FSVP) requires that importers perform certain risk-based activities to verify that food imported into the United States has been produced in a manner that meets applicable U.S. safety standards.
One of the first challenges for food importers is determining if a particular food falls under FSMA or is excluded. There are many foods imported into the U.S. that may be excluded from FSMA coverage because pre-existing regulation are already in place. These include foods regulated under previously enacted FDA regulations for seafood and juice products. Foods that fall under USDA jurisdiction, specifically meat and poultry products, are excluded because USDA has established its own import regulations. There are also exclusions for imported foods that will not be consumed in the U.S., as well as foods imported solely for test purposes. A general rule to remember is that if a food that is not excluded, it will fall under one or more of the FSMA rules.
A key point for importers to understand is that all foods that are brought into the U.S., and then consumed in the US, must meet U.S. food safety standards. This means that fresh fruits and vegetables grown in another country for export to the U.S. must be grown, harvested, packed, and held under the standards established in the Produce Safety Rule. Foods (human or animal) or food ingredients imported into the U.S. for further processing by U.S. manufacturers will fall under the food safety requirements written in the Preventive Controls Rule for Human Foods or the similar rule for animals food. Imported foods that will not be processed by the importer such as those directly sold through retail entities must assume responsibility, in conjunction with their foreign supplier for the safety the product by developing a plan by to ensure that the safety of the product is properly controlled by the foreign supplier. It is the importer’s responsibility to understand the requirements of this rule and implement necessary measures to ensure that their foreign supplier has adequate food safety controls in place.
In some cases, the determination of who the importer is is not easy. Imported foods may by touched by a number of different entities as they make their way into the U.S. The key part of the regulation is to make sure that the importer is identified before the food enters the U.S. FDA requires this in order to assign responsibility for the imported product to that entity. This responsible entity must have a U.S. address where the proper documentation will be kept.
The designated FSVP importer is required, through development of a hazard analysis, to determine what potential hazards, if any, represent a potential risk for the given imported food. For those identified hazards having significant potential risk, the importer must ensure, or verify, that the foreign supplier has adequate controls to prevent or eliminate that risk. As a means of verification, importers can use one or more ways, including implementing testing requirements, conducting food safety audits, and collecting pertinent documentation. Verification must take place beforehand as part of a supplier approval process, and then monitored on an ongoing basis.
Individuals tasked with writing and implementing an a Foreign Supplier Verification Program must be qualified through training to do the task. This can be accomplished through attending a FSVP training course developed by the Food Safety and Preventive Control Alliance (FSPCA) and which is offered by Penn State. This training is not just necessary for those who import foods and therefore must write a FSVP plan. It is also important for U.S. food processors, retailers, and other food businesses who buy food from foreign sources; because in the end, they will also pay a price for a foreign supplier’s inadequate food safety program.
As you can see, the FSVP is complex and requires training to understand how the rule could affect your food operation. Visit the Penn State Extension FSMA website at extension.psu.edu/fsma for more information on the FSVP Rule and when and where Penn State will be offering training.
Links.
Registration site for the Penn State Foreign Supplier Verification Workshop
https://extension.psu.edu/foreign-supplier-verification-workshop
FSMA Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVP) for Importers of Food for Humans and Animals
https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/ucm361902.htm
One of the first challenges for food importers is determining if a particular food falls under FSMA or is excluded. There are many foods imported into the U.S. that may be excluded from FSMA coverage because pre-existing regulation are already in place. These include foods regulated under previously enacted FDA regulations for seafood and juice products. Foods that fall under USDA jurisdiction, specifically meat and poultry products, are excluded because USDA has established its own import regulations. There are also exclusions for imported foods that will not be consumed in the U.S., as well as foods imported solely for test purposes. A general rule to remember is that if a food that is not excluded, it will fall under one or more of the FSMA rules.
A key point for importers to understand is that all foods that are brought into the U.S., and then consumed in the US, must meet U.S. food safety standards. This means that fresh fruits and vegetables grown in another country for export to the U.S. must be grown, harvested, packed, and held under the standards established in the Produce Safety Rule. Foods (human or animal) or food ingredients imported into the U.S. for further processing by U.S. manufacturers will fall under the food safety requirements written in the Preventive Controls Rule for Human Foods or the similar rule for animals food. Imported foods that will not be processed by the importer such as those directly sold through retail entities must assume responsibility, in conjunction with their foreign supplier for the safety the product by developing a plan by to ensure that the safety of the product is properly controlled by the foreign supplier. It is the importer’s responsibility to understand the requirements of this rule and implement necessary measures to ensure that their foreign supplier has adequate food safety controls in place.
In some cases, the determination of who the importer is is not easy. Imported foods may by touched by a number of different entities as they make their way into the U.S. The key part of the regulation is to make sure that the importer is identified before the food enters the U.S. FDA requires this in order to assign responsibility for the imported product to that entity. This responsible entity must have a U.S. address where the proper documentation will be kept.
The designated FSVP importer is required, through development of a hazard analysis, to determine what potential hazards, if any, represent a potential risk for the given imported food. For those identified hazards having significant potential risk, the importer must ensure, or verify, that the foreign supplier has adequate controls to prevent or eliminate that risk. As a means of verification, importers can use one or more ways, including implementing testing requirements, conducting food safety audits, and collecting pertinent documentation. Verification must take place beforehand as part of a supplier approval process, and then monitored on an ongoing basis.
Individuals tasked with writing and implementing an a Foreign Supplier Verification Program must be qualified through training to do the task. This can be accomplished through attending a FSVP training course developed by the Food Safety and Preventive Control Alliance (FSPCA) and which is offered by Penn State. This training is not just necessary for those who import foods and therefore must write a FSVP plan. It is also important for U.S. food processors, retailers, and other food businesses who buy food from foreign sources; because in the end, they will also pay a price for a foreign supplier’s inadequate food safety program.
As you can see, the FSVP is complex and requires training to understand how the rule could affect your food operation. Visit the Penn State Extension FSMA website at extension.psu.edu/fsma for more information on the FSVP Rule and when and where Penn State will be offering training.
Links.
Registration site for the Penn State Foreign Supplier Verification Workshop
https://extension.psu.edu/foreign-supplier-verification-workshop
FSMA Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVP) for Importers of Food for Humans and Animals
https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/ucm361902.htm
People Have Gene to Produce Chitin Digesting Enzyme - Please Pass the Stinkbugs
A study in Molecular Biology and Evolution shows that people do have the enzyme that can break down insect casings. Primates, including humans do have the gene that breaks down chitin, the substance that forms the exoskeleton of bugs. Most of us were taught that chitin would not be broken down in our digestive systems. Not so.
An article in National Geographic from 2013, U.N. Urges Eating Insects; 8 Popular Bugs to Try, suggests these bug species:
1. Beetles
2. Butterflies and Moths
3. Bees and wasps
4. Ants
5. Grasshoppers, crickets, and locusts
6. Flies and mosquitos
7. Water boatmen and backswimmers
8. Stinkbugs
Yes, Stinkbugs....from the article "If you can get past the funky smell, these insects apparently add an apple flavor to sauces and are a valuable source of iodine. They're also known to have anesthetic and analgesic properties. Who would have thought?" Not me, that is for sure.
So what wine should we pair with our bowl of crunchy crickets.....a nice grassy sauvignon blanc perhaps? An article on the subject in Food and Wine magazine suggests pairing a Riesling with honey mustard crickets.
IFT Weekly Newsletter
http://www.ift.org/Food-Technology/Newsletters/IFT-Weekly-Newsletter/2018/February/021418.aspx
Study finds most primates, including humans, can digest insects
An article in National Geographic from 2013, U.N. Urges Eating Insects; 8 Popular Bugs to Try, suggests these bug species:
1. Beetles
2. Butterflies and Moths
3. Bees and wasps
4. Ants
5. Grasshoppers, crickets, and locusts
6. Flies and mosquitos
7. Water boatmen and backswimmers
8. Stinkbugs
Yes, Stinkbugs....from the article "If you can get past the funky smell, these insects apparently add an apple flavor to sauces and are a valuable source of iodine. They're also known to have anesthetic and analgesic properties. Who would have thought?" Not me, that is for sure.
So what wine should we pair with our bowl of crunchy crickets.....a nice grassy sauvignon blanc perhaps? An article on the subject in Food and Wine magazine suggests pairing a Riesling with honey mustard crickets.
IFT Weekly Newsletter
http://www.ift.org/Food-Technology/Newsletters/IFT-Weekly-Newsletter/2018/February/021418.aspx
Study finds most primates, including humans, can digest insects
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
Iowa Retailer Recalls Chicken Salad After Reported Cases of Salmonella Infection
An Iowa retailer is recalling chicken salad after the product was linked to several cases of Salmonella infection. The chicken salad was produced by a third party establishment.
Iowa Department of Public Health News Release
Iowa Department of Public Health News Release
https://idph.iowa.gov/News/ArtMID/646/ArticleID/158205/Consumer-Advisory-Issued-for-Chicken-Salad-Purchased-at-Fareway-21318
Consumer Advisory Issued for Chicken Salad Purchased at Fareway (2/13/18)
Author: Polly Carver-Kimm/
Tuesday, February 13, 2018/
Categories: Infectious Disease Prevention
FDA Issues Alert for Raw Pet Food Brands About Potential Pathogens
FDA issued an alert for raw pet food products under the Darwin’s Natural and ZooLogics brand labels. "The FDA is alerting pet owners to a history of four recalls of and multiple complaints associated with Darwin’s Natural and ZooLogics pet foods, manufactured by Arrow Reliance Inc., dba Darwin’s Natural Pet Products, over the period from October 17, 2016 to February 10, 2018. In each instance, the company recalled these products after being alerted to positive findings of Salmonella and/or Listeria monocytogenes in samples of their raw pet food products."
There have been a number of complaints of illness and deaths associated with the product. "As part of an ongoing investigation into complaints associated with products manufactured by Arrow Reliance/Darwin’s Natural of Tukwila, WA, the FDA has confirmed that new samples of Darwin’s Natural Pet Products raw pet foods have tested positive for Salmonella." In addition to illness, there have also been injuries associated with bone shards.
As FDA states on this Alert, "Raw pet food is more likely than other types of pet food to contain Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes. Pet owners who choose to feed raw pet food should be aware of the risks associated with these products." But it further states, "The FDA has a zero-tolerance policy for Salmonella or other pathogenic bacteria in all pet food, meaning the agency will take action, as appropriate, against any pet food found to be contaminated with the harmful bacteria."
So why aren't these processors using High Pressure Processing to eliminate pathogens? Why do we recall it knowing that pathogens can be present? Why do people buy this knowing that the harm to the dog can far outweigh any benefit? Really, if people want to feed raw meat to dogs, buy whole cuts of meat, surface sanitize and cut it yourself. While this will not eliminate the risk completely, it is less risky than buying commercially made product.
FDA Alert
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596594.htm
FDA Investigates Pattern of Contamination in Certain Raw Pet Foods Made by Arrow Reliance Inc., Including Darwin’s Natural Pet Products and ZooLogics Pet Food
For Immediate Release
February 13, 2018
There have been a number of complaints of illness and deaths associated with the product. "As part of an ongoing investigation into complaints associated with products manufactured by Arrow Reliance/Darwin’s Natural of Tukwila, WA, the FDA has confirmed that new samples of Darwin’s Natural Pet Products raw pet foods have tested positive for Salmonella." In addition to illness, there have also been injuries associated with bone shards.
As FDA states on this Alert, "Raw pet food is more likely than other types of pet food to contain Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes. Pet owners who choose to feed raw pet food should be aware of the risks associated with these products." But it further states, "The FDA has a zero-tolerance policy for Salmonella or other pathogenic bacteria in all pet food, meaning the agency will take action, as appropriate, against any pet food found to be contaminated with the harmful bacteria."
So why aren't these processors using High Pressure Processing to eliminate pathogens? Why do we recall it knowing that pathogens can be present? Why do people buy this knowing that the harm to the dog can far outweigh any benefit? Really, if people want to feed raw meat to dogs, buy whole cuts of meat, surface sanitize and cut it yourself. While this will not eliminate the risk completely, it is less risky than buying commercially made product.
FDA Alert
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596594.htm
FDA Investigates Pattern of Contamination in Certain Raw Pet Foods Made by Arrow Reliance Inc., Including Darwin’s Natural Pet Products and ZooLogics Pet Food
For Immediate Release
February 13, 2018
Online Consumer Complaint Portals - Too Much Transparency?
An interesting article in the NY Times titled Too Much Power to the People? A Food Safety Site Tests the Limits discusses the online complaint site IWasPoisoned.com and the impact it has on food companies. According the article, the site has collected about 89,000 reports since starting in 2009. The site provides an outlet for consumers to voice their issues, in this case, the blame for their illness.
The website does review complain submissions and they do provide an opportunity for those establishments which have been blamed for an illness to appeal any complaints.
While it has proved a key for pointing out linkages to foodborne illness associated with less-than-good operators such as Chipolte, there are some major drawbacks of having too much transparency.
"Restaurant executives have criticized IWasPoisoned for allowing anonymous and unverified submissions, which they say leads to false reports and irresponsible fear-mongering. Some public health officials have objected on the grounds that food poisoning victims can’t be trusted to correctly identify what made them sick."
So for one, people can publicly bash a restaurant with out substantiating the restaurants involvement. Depending on the type of agent involved in foodborne illness, the food may have been consumed hours before or days before the symptoms show up. Unfortunately, people are apt to blame the food they last ate.
People may just want to pile on without actually being sick. In some cases, people may do it because they don't like a given food establishment, or perhaps they favor a competitor.
The website does review complain submissions and they do provide an opportunity for those establishments which have been blamed for an illness to appeal any complaints.
However, the high level of transparency makes this information readily available for all, including news media outlets who are always hungry to report an outbreak of foodborne illness.
One fact is interesting in how a website like this makes money - they provide an early warning to investor and others willing to pay for leads on a given restaurant that may be involved in an outbreak scenario.
NY Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/13/business/too-much-power-to-the-people-a-food-safety-site-tests-the-limits.html
Business Day
Too Much Power to the People? A Food Safety Site Tests the Limits
The Shift
By KEVIN ROOSE FEB. 13, 2018
NY Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/13/business/too-much-power-to-the-people-a-food-safety-site-tests-the-limits.html
Business Day
Too Much Power to the People? A Food Safety Site Tests the Limits
The Shift
By KEVIN ROOSE FEB. 13, 2018
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Dog Treats Recalled After Positive Laboratory Test
A CA pet products company is recalling a single product, bully stick dog chews, after the Colorado Department of Agriculture found that a single sample collected from a retail location detected positive for Salmonella. According to the owner, every product lot before it tested before it leaves the manufacturing plant. This lot code in question was tested both at the company lab as well as by a third-party testing facility.
Hopefully the positive was analyzed to determine that it was not from the laboratory. But conducting further analysis, specifically DNA testing, will help in determining the source and whether this organism was transient or established within the facility.
Is it possible for a facility to do finished product testing and still have a positive sampling? Absolutely. Small levels of contamination may not be found by limited finished product testing. More important is having a comprehensive monitoring system that focuses on the environment.
FDA Recall Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596190.htm
Redbarn Pet Products Issues Voluntary Recall of Dog Chews
For Immediate Release
February 9, 2018
Hopefully the positive was analyzed to determine that it was not from the laboratory. But conducting further analysis, specifically DNA testing, will help in determining the source and whether this organism was transient or established within the facility.
Is it possible for a facility to do finished product testing and still have a positive sampling? Absolutely. Small levels of contamination may not be found by limited finished product testing. More important is having a comprehensive monitoring system that focuses on the environment.
FDA Recall Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596190.htm
Redbarn Pet Products Issues Voluntary Recall of Dog Chews
For Immediate Release
February 9, 2018
Study Assesses Exposure to PAA for Food Processing Employee Safety
With peracetic acid (PAA) being used more in food processing operations, a study reported in Meatingplace looked at exposure levels to employees who work in poultry facilities. In summary, the level of exposure to employees was below proposed threshold limits for health and safety, but the researchers recommended additional work is needed.
Meatingplace - Industry News - AM
Meatingplace - Industry News - AM
http://www.meatingplace.com/Industry/News/Details/78054
Study assesses poultry workers’ exposure to peracetic acid
By Tom Johnston on 2/13/2018
Study assesses poultry workers’ exposure to peracetic acid
By Tom Johnston on 2/13/2018
Monday, February 12, 2018
FDA Releases 2017 Food Code - What's New in the Regulation
FDA released the 2017 version of the Food Code. The Food Code is a model for ensuring safe food that is provided for adoption by local, state, and federal governmental jurisdictions for administration to food service, retail food stores, or food vending operations. Every 4 years, a new version is issued with updates. According to the release, there are 4 significant changes.
Item #1 - Revised requirement for the Person in Charge (PIC) to be a Certified Food Protection Manager (CFPM) (Section 2-102.12)
What’s changed – in the 2013 version, section 2-102.12 specifies that one person within the operation be a certified person. The update removes the 'one person' but puts in that the person in charge is teh certified person. The change makes the regulation less prescriptive, so instead of saying at least one person, now it says whoever has the duties of the person in change (2-103.11), that person has to be certified. This may make it easier for small multi-unit operations to comply.
Item #2 - Added a new section that addresses the use of bandages, finger cots or finger stalls (Section 2-401.13)
What’s new – This section was added into the code. While covered in the ServSafe training, covering a wound on the hand is now detailed in the regulation - the wound is covered by bandage or cot (or stall) and then covered by a glove. (A finger cot and stall are essentially the same, but a stall generally refers to a finger covering that has a support back to the wrist).
LINK to 2017 Food Code
The specific sections are covered below showing impacted sections of the regulation.
FDA Constituent Update
LINK To Announcement
FDA Releases 2017 Food Code
Item #1 - Revised requirement for the Person in Charge (PIC) to be a Certified Food Protection Manager (CFPM) (Section 2-102.12)
What’s changed – in the 2013 version, section 2-102.12 specifies that one person within the operation be a certified person. The update removes the 'one person' but puts in that the person in charge is teh certified person. The change makes the regulation less prescriptive, so instead of saying at least one person, now it says whoever has the duties of the person in change (2-103.11), that person has to be certified. This may make it easier for small multi-unit operations to comply.
Item #2 - Added a new section that addresses the use of bandages, finger cots or finger stalls (Section 2-401.13)
What’s new – This section was added into the code. While covered in the ServSafe training, covering a wound on the hand is now detailed in the regulation - the wound is covered by bandage or cot (or stall) and then covered by a glove. (A finger cot and stall are essentially the same, but a stall generally refers to a finger covering that has a support back to the wrist).
Item #3 Harmonized cooking time/temperature parameters for intact and non-intact meat and poultry in accordance with guidance from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA-FSIS) (Section 3-401.11)
What's changed - There are two significant changes here - the first is the dwell time for ground meat, injected meat, mechanically tenderized meat - it is 155ºF for 17 seconds, instead of 15 seconds. The second is for poultry and stuffed meat - the temperature is 165ºF is an instantaneous time, instead of of what is listed in the earlier versions as 15 seconds.
Item #4 Updated procedures for retail food establishment operations to continue during an extended water or electrical outage if a written emergency operation plan has been pre-approved by the Regulatory Authority, immediate corrective action taken and the Regulatory Authority has been notified upon implementation of the plan (Section 8-404.11)
What's changed - More detail was added to the regulation about continuing operation when an outage of electrical or water service is encountered. It gives the regulatory authority and the operator means of writing and approving a plan provided there is no risk.
The specific sections are covered below showing impacted sections of the regulation.
FDA Constituent Update
LINK To Announcement
FDA Releases 2017 Food Code
Friday, February 9, 2018
Recall Data from Past Five Years - What is Changing?
Each quarter, Stericycle Expert Solutions releases their Recall Index which analyzes the frequency, volume, and causes of U.S. product recalls. This week they issued a 5 year summary of making these reports. From this article, Reflections on Recalls: Five Years of the Stericycle Expert Solutions Recall Index
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reflections-on-recalls-five-years-of-the-stericycle-expert-solutions-recall-index-300594063.html
Reflections on Recalls: Five Years of the Stericycle Expert Solutions Recall Index
Q4 2017 Recall Index Reveals Zero Fines for Consumer Products, Continued Decreases in Medical Device Recalls, and Severity of Drug Recalls Continuing to Rise, Among Other Findings
"The food and beverage industry experienced the most dramatic spike in units recalled over the past five years. Food products recalled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) skyrocketed 92.7 percent since 2012, and recalled pounds regulated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which largely oversees meat production, jumped 83.4 percent in the same period. Technological improvements in food testing, combined with factory farming and growing automation in food production were major drivers of the increases. "Many have interpreted this report to make it seem like things are out of control. Not really. Increased testing, improved testing, and a risk-averse public have more to do with the number of recalls. Our systems of supply have not changed as much as our testing requirements and capabilities and with that, our threshold for the issues that are found. Because of this, our food supply is becoming more safe, not less safe.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/reflections-on-recalls-five-years-of-the-stericycle-expert-solutions-recall-index-300594063.html
Reflections on Recalls: Five Years of the Stericycle Expert Solutions Recall Index
Q4 2017 Recall Index Reveals Zero Fines for Consumer Products, Continued Decreases in Medical Device Recalls, and Severity of Drug Recalls Continuing to Rise, Among Other Findings
FDA Has Increased Number of Imported Shrimp Refusals
According to Seafood Source, the FDA has had an increase in the number of import refusals for shrimp in the month of January. The issues were due to the presence of Salmonella while others were rejected for the presence of banned antibiotics.
As stated in the article, many of these suppliers are on import alert which holds the import until the proper testing can be completed. Once a supplier is place on import alert, it can be very difficult to get off of that list.
Seafood Source
https://www.seafoodsource.com/news/food-safety-health/fdas-shrimp-import-refusals-rose-in-january
FDA’s shrimp import refusals rose in January
By Christine Blank
https://www.seafoodsource.com/news/food-safety-health/fdas-shrimp-import-refusals-rose-in-january
FDA’s shrimp import refusals rose in January
By Christine Blank
Lawsuit Against Cruise Line After Ship Has Eight Consecutive Norovirus Outbreaks
In 2016/2017, there was a norovirus outbreak on eight consecutive cruises on the Sun Princess cruise ship. A lawsuit is being filed that "Carnival was negligent in its sanitation of the vessel, leading to continued outbreaks." While the ship has had satisfactory inspection, this case points to the difficulty of eliminating an pathogen such as norovirus.
Norovirus is highly infectious, so there does not need for a lot of virus particle to be present. As a non-enveloped virus, it can remain on surfaces for weeks. Thirdly, it is resistant to normal strength sanitizers, so you have to clean and then hit with a strong sanitizer. This can be a problem when the particles get onto carpeting, bedding, and other non-easy-to-clean surfaces. Add this to the fact that these cruise ships are huge - this one has a capacity over 2000 passengers with 15 decks, 1000 cabins, and a slew of lounges, bars, and recreational areas. And then, if the article below is correct, they are turning this ship around for the next cruise in hours.
Miami Herald
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/tourism-cruises/article198720189.html
On eight cruises in a row, passengers got ‘violently ill.’ A lawsuit may be coming
By Chabeli Herrera cherrera@miamiherald.com
February 06, 2018 06:00 PM
Updated February 07, 2018 03:10 PM
Miami Herald
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/business/tourism-cruises/article198720189.html
On eight cruises in a row, passengers got ‘violently ill.’ A lawsuit may be coming
By Chabeli Herrera cherrera@miamiherald.com
February 06, 2018 06:00 PM
Updated February 07, 2018 03:10 PM
Pork Extract Broth Recalled for Improper Processing
An Okla. establishment, is recalling approximately 4,202 pounds of fully cooked pork products due to a processing deviation that may have allowed potential spore-forming pathogen growth including Clostridium botulinum and Clostridium perfringens, It is a paitan which is a soup base made from meat, bone and cartilage extract, so contains fats and collagen to form a hearty thick broth.
This product is a cooked product that is packed in plastic pouches (pillow pack) and then frozen. This is used as an ingredient. Processing is not designed to rid products of spores, so the issue would have had to have been related to the cooling to freezing. If not cooled properly, Clostridial spores, which survive the cooking, would have had an opportunity to grow.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-009-2018-release
Guymon Extracts, Inc. Recalls Fully Cooked Pork Products Due to Possible Processing Deviation
Class I Recall
009-2018
Health Risk: High
Feb 6, 2018
This product is a cooked product that is packed in plastic pouches (pillow pack) and then frozen. This is used as an ingredient. Processing is not designed to rid products of spores, so the issue would have had to have been related to the cooling to freezing. If not cooled properly, Clostridial spores, which survive the cooking, would have had an opportunity to grow.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2018/recall-009-2018-release
Guymon Extracts, Inc. Recalls Fully Cooked Pork Products Due to Possible Processing Deviation
Class I Recall
009-2018
Health Risk: High
Feb 6, 2018
This Week in Mislabeled Product - Week Ending February 9, 2018
Wasabi Almonds Packaged in an Unsalted Almond Package - Kanan Enterprises announces the voluntary recall of Southern Grove Unsalted Almond 14 oz., Best By SEP 25 2018 KN due to the presence of wheat and soy that are not listed as ingredients. The company was notified by a customer that wasabi almonds were packaged in a bag of Southern Grove Unsalted Almonds.
In-store Label Missing Allergens Associated with Mayonnaise and Sour Cream - Weis Markets today announced it had issued a recall for its store-made Weis Quality Dried Beef Party Rye dip for failing to list egg and milk allergens on its label.
In-store Label Missing Allergens Leaves Out Milk - Weis Markets today announced it had issued a recall for its pre-made Penne Pasta with Asiago Sauce and Grilled Chicken single serving meal for failing to list a milk allergen on its label. The problem was discovered during a label review.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm595459.htm
Kanan Enterprises Conducts Voluntary Recall of Southern Grove Unsalted Almond Due to Undeclared Wheat and Soy
For Immediate Release
February 2, 2018
Contact
Consumers 1-800-860-5464
In-store Label Missing Allergens Associated with Mayonnaise and Sour Cream - Weis Markets today announced it had issued a recall for its store-made Weis Quality Dried Beef Party Rye dip for failing to list egg and milk allergens on its label.
In-store Label Missing Allergens Leaves Out Milk - Weis Markets today announced it had issued a recall for its pre-made Penne Pasta with Asiago Sauce and Grilled Chicken single serving meal for failing to list a milk allergen on its label. The problem was discovered during a label review.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm595459.htm
Kanan Enterprises Conducts Voluntary Recall of Southern Grove Unsalted Almond Due to Undeclared Wheat and Soy
For Immediate Release
February 2, 2018
Contact
Consumers 1-800-860-5464
Retailer Recalls Yogurt for Potential Glass Contamination
Meijer is recalling of their Greek and Low-fat yogurt as a precautionary measure due to the potential risk of a small glass particles after customer returned a yogurt cup containing two small pieces of glass. "Upon investigation at the retailer’s manufacturing facility, there may have been a possible risk of contamination."
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596050.htm
Meijer Recalls Select Meijer Greek and Low Fat Yogurt Products
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596050.htm
Meijer Recalls Select Meijer Greek and Low Fat Yogurt Products
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
Raw Ground Turkey Pet Food Recalled for Salmonella Contamination
A Minnesota Pet Food Company, Raw for Paws, is recalling its Ground Turkey Pet Food after two reported illnesses and "testing by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) revealed the presence of Salmonella in some packages of Turkey Pet Food."
Raw ground turkey AND Salmonella...is this surprising?....wouldn't one think that there may be some Salmonella present?. Tried to determine if this product was HPP processed, but the company website is down. The company does have safe handling instructions, but of course does not include cooking.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596043.htm
Raws For Paws Recalls Turkey Pet Food Because of Possible Salmonella Health Risk
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
Raw ground turkey AND Salmonella...is this surprising?....wouldn't one think that there may be some Salmonella present?. Tried to determine if this product was HPP processed, but the company website is down. The company does have safe handling instructions, but of course does not include cooking.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596043.htm
Raws For Paws Recalls Turkey Pet Food Because of Possible Salmonella Health Risk
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
Beefy Munchies Dog Treats Recalled After Salmonella Positive Test
A California Pet Food company, Smokehouse Pet Products, Inc. "is recalling 4-oz bags of dog treats labeled as “Beefy Munchies,” because it has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella." The issue was found through routine sampling by the Colorado Department of Agriculture which resulted in a Salmonella positive sample.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596038.htm
Smokehouse Pet Products Inc Recalls Limited Lots of “Beefy Munchies” Sold Regionally Because of Possible Salmonella Contamination
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm596038.htm
Smokehouse Pet Products Inc Recalls Limited Lots of “Beefy Munchies” Sold Regionally Because of Possible Salmonella Contamination
For Immediate Release
February 8, 2018
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)