Jimbo’s Kitchen, DBA New England Cupboard is recalling Jimbo’s Bloody Mary Mix because it contains undeclared soy, wheat and sulfites. On the back label of the finished product, the ingredients list for Worcestershire Powder did not have all the sub-ingredients listed (e.g., corn syrup solids, salt, caramel color, garlic, sugar, spices, soy sauce solids (naturally fermented wheat and soybeans, salt, maltodextrin, caramel color), palm oil, tamarind, natural flavors, sulfiting agents).
How many times has Worcestershire Sauce (in this case powder) led to an allergen recall because somebody does not call out the allergens included in that ingredient. In this particular Worcestershire ingredient, there is no fish (anchovies), however, there is soy, wheat, and sulfites.
https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/jimbos-kitchen-dba-new-england-cupboard-issues-allergy-alert-jimbos-bloody-mary-mix
Jimbo’s Kitchen, DBA New England Cupboard Issues Allergy Alert on Jimbo’s Bloody Mary Mix
Summary
Company Announcement Date: August 24, 2021
FDA Publish Date: August 25, 2021
Product Type: Food & Beverages
Reason for Announcement: Undeclared Soy, Wheat, & Sulfites
Company Name: Jimbo’s
Brand Name: Jimbo’s Kitchen dba New England Cupboard
Product Description: Bloody Mary Mix
Friday, August 27, 2021
Smoked Salmon Product Recalled After FDA Testing Detects Listeria
Loki Fish Company of Seattle, Washington is recalling 4 oz. packages of Keta Salmon Lox (UPC code 92103 00111) after FDA testing detected Listeria monocytogenes in a sample(s). "The possibility of contamination was discovered during the FDA inspection at our co-packer Felix Custom Smoking, of Monroe, Washington in July 2021. Loki submitted samples of the Keta Lox to Micro-Chem Laboratories for testing. Loki has ceased production, sales, and distribution of keta lox immediately and Loki will continue the investigation as to what caused the problem."
Listeria is a risk in packaged of refrigerated RTE smoked salmon due to post process contamination. That is, after the smoking process, the filets are often sliced and then packaged. If the post process environment is not cleaned to a point where Listeria is under control, Listeria can contaminate the product, especially if there is additional handling and preparation such as slicing.
Listeria is a risk in packaged of refrigerated RTE smoked salmon due to post process contamination. That is, after the smoking process, the filets are often sliced and then packaged. If the post process environment is not cleaned to a point where Listeria is under control, Listeria can contaminate the product, especially if there is additional handling and preparation such as slicing.
This product was packed by another company under a co-packing arrangement, so it is important for the brand owner to ensure that the co-packer has tight Listeria controls.
https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/loki-fish-company-recalls-keta-salmon-lox-because-possible-health-risk
Loki Fish Company Recalls Keta Salmon Lox Because of Possible Health Risk
Summary
Company Announcement Date: August 23, 2021
FDA Publish Date: August 23, 2021
Product Type: Food & Beverages
Reason for Announcement: Listeria monocytogenes
Company Name: Loki Fish Company
Brand Name: Loki Fish Co.
Product Description: Keta Salmon Lox
https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/loki-fish-company-recalls-keta-salmon-lox-because-possible-health-risk
Loki Fish Company Recalls Keta Salmon Lox Because of Possible Health Risk
Summary
Company Announcement Date: August 23, 2021
FDA Publish Date: August 23, 2021
Product Type: Food & Beverages
Reason for Announcement: Listeria monocytogenes
Company Name: Loki Fish Company
Brand Name: Loki Fish Co.
Product Description: Keta Salmon Lox
Wednesday, August 25, 2021
CDC Investigating Two Salmonella Outbreaks That May Be Linked to Italian-Style Deli Meats
The CDC is investigating two multistate outbreaks of Salmonella infections—one involving Salmonella Typhimurium infections and one with Salmonella Infantis infections, with the likely sources of both outbreaks being Italian-style meats. As of August 24, 2021, a total of 36 people are reported as being infected with either Salmonella outbreak strain - 23 people with Salmonella Typhimurium and 13 people with Salmonella Infantis.
"CDC is advising people at higher risk for severe Salmonella illness to heat Italian-style meats to an internal temperature of 165°F or until steaming hot before eating."
Salmonella Outbreaks Linked to Italian-Style Meats
https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/italian-style-meat-08-21/details.html
Investigation Details
Posted August 24, 2021
"CDC is advising people at higher risk for severe Salmonella illness to heat Italian-style meats to an internal temperature of 165°F or until steaming hot before eating."
Salmonella Outbreaks Linked to Italian-Style Meats
https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/italian-style-meat-08-21/details.html
Investigation Details
Posted August 24, 2021
Fast Facts
Illnesses: 36
Hospitalizations: 12
Deaths: 0
States: 17
Recall: No
Investigation status: Active
What to Know About Food Products Labeled as Containing Wild Mushrooms
Research out of Utah found that products claiming to contain 'wild mushrooms' often contain cultivated mushrooms.
Researchers used "DNA barcoding techniques to test what mushroom species made up 16 food products that listed “wild mushrooms” on their labels." "They found 28 species of mushrooms across all 16 food products. Almost all products that claimed to have wild mushrooms consisted of cultivated species, including oyster, shiitake, or portabella mushrooms. Only five products had contents that were accurately described on the label, and some included species that likely have yet to be described in academic literature."
"One packet of dried wild mushrooms from the online retailer contained a species from a group of fungi that includes the “Death Cap,” a notoriously poisonous mushroom known to cause renal failure in humans..... The authors contacted the online retailer to inform them of the potential dangers of the product. As of the paper’s publication, the dried mushrooms are still for sale. " Question - why didn't the researchers contact the FDA????
Regulating the practice of harvesting wild mushrooms is not easy. Much depends on the harvester being able to identify safe edible mushrooms from those that are dangerous, and even deadly. In the end, much is left to the regulatory authority to determine.
From the US Food Code (2017)
3-201.16 Wild Mushrooms.
(A) Except as specified in ¶ (B) of this section, mushroom species picked in the wild shall not be offered for sale or service by a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT unless the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT has been APPROVED to do so.
(B) This section does not apply to:
(1) Cultivated wild mushroom species that are grown, harvested, and processed in an operation that is regulated by the FOOD regulatory agency that has jurisdiction over the operation; or
(2) Wild mushroom species if they are in packaged form and are the product of a FOOD PROCESSING PLANT that is regulated by the FOOD regulatory agency that has jurisdiction over the plant.
Researchers used "DNA barcoding techniques to test what mushroom species made up 16 food products that listed “wild mushrooms” on their labels." "They found 28 species of mushrooms across all 16 food products. Almost all products that claimed to have wild mushrooms consisted of cultivated species, including oyster, shiitake, or portabella mushrooms. Only five products had contents that were accurately described on the label, and some included species that likely have yet to be described in academic literature."
"One packet of dried wild mushrooms from the online retailer contained a species from a group of fungi that includes the “Death Cap,” a notoriously poisonous mushroom known to cause renal failure in humans..... The authors contacted the online retailer to inform them of the potential dangers of the product. As of the paper’s publication, the dried mushrooms are still for sale. " Question - why didn't the researchers contact the FDA????
Regulating the practice of harvesting wild mushrooms is not easy. Much depends on the harvester being able to identify safe edible mushrooms from those that are dangerous, and even deadly. In the end, much is left to the regulatory authority to determine.
From the US Food Code (2017)
3-201.16 Wild Mushrooms.
(A) Except as specified in ¶ (B) of this section, mushroom species picked in the wild shall not be offered for sale or service by a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT unless the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT has been APPROVED to do so.
(B) This section does not apply to:
(1) Cultivated wild mushroom species that are grown, harvested, and processed in an operation that is regulated by the FOOD regulatory agency that has jurisdiction over the operation; or
(2) Wild mushroom species if they are in packaged form and are the product of a FOOD PROCESSING PLANT that is regulated by the FOOD regulatory agency that has jurisdiction over the plant.
Chicken Salad and Dip Products Recalled After A Complaint of Foreign Piece of Hard White Plastic
Willow Tree Poultry Farm, an Attleboro, Mass. establishment, is recalling approximately 52,022 pounds of various chicken salads and dip products that may be contaminated with extraneous materials, specifically hard white plastic. The problem was discovered after the company received a consumer complaint and notified FSIS
That is a lot of product to recall, 26 tons, for a complaint of hard white plastic. To me, this may be a little over the top, unless the company recognized that there was a bigger issue underlying the complaint.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/recalls-alerts/willow-tree-poultry-farm-recalls-chicken-salad-and-dip-products-due-possible-foreign
Willow Tree Poultry Farm Recalls Chicken Salad and Dip Products Due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
WASHINGTON, Aug. 24, 2021 – Willow Tree Poultry Farm, an Attleboro, Mass. establishment, is recalling approximately 52,022 pounds of various chicken salads and dip products that may be contaminated with extraneous materials, specifically hard white plastic the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced today.
That is a lot of product to recall, 26 tons, for a complaint of hard white plastic. To me, this may be a little over the top, unless the company recognized that there was a bigger issue underlying the complaint.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/recalls-alerts/willow-tree-poultry-farm-recalls-chicken-salad-and-dip-products-due-possible-foreign
Willow Tree Poultry Farm Recalls Chicken Salad and Dip Products Due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
WASHINGTON, Aug. 24, 2021 – Willow Tree Poultry Farm, an Attleboro, Mass. establishment, is recalling approximately 52,022 pounds of various chicken salads and dip products that may be contaminated with extraneous materials, specifically hard white plastic the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced today.
Friday, August 20, 2021
25 Years of HACCP Regulation for Meat and Poultry Operations
USDA issued the Pathogen Reduction/Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (PR/HACCP) in 1995, 25 years ago this summer. While HACCP systems were in use by larger companies, a large foodborne illness outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 associated with Jack-in-the-Box restaurants served as the impetus for USDA to issue regulations requiring mandatory HACCP for all meat and poultry operations.
“Food safety is an ever-evolving process,” said FSIS Administrator Paul Kiecker, who began his Agency career as an inspector in a food processing establishment. “HACCP marked a dramatic change in food safety and how FSIS approached its mission of keeping food safe and role of inspecting processing establishments,” said Kiecker.
At that time, I was the microbiology manager for one of the more notable food laboratories / consulting companies that supported a large number of meat processors. In this role, we supported companies as they transitioned to HACCP based systems. What struck me at the time was the number of companies that were more bent on fighting the regulation rather than adopting this risk-based tool that provided a systematic way of identifying and controlling hazards. Sure there was documentation requirements, but those requirements were never as burdensome as some believed them to be...at least not if they were smart about how it was all managed. The costs of implementing these systems were often recovered through savings in having better control systems. But as we see know, the biggest advantage was a drop in foodborne illness cases. And we probably don't know the real reduction since our capability of seeing all the cases of illness at that time is nowhere near what it is today.
Still we have room for improvement, no doubt, but the industry has done a tremendous job in reducing foodborne illness levels. We need to recognize those that work hard each day carrying out their tasks to support their HACCP requirements...including sanitation, processing, quality, and laboratory.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/news-events/news-press-releases/reflecting-25-years-haccp
Reflecting on 25 Years of HACCP
JACK CONNOLLY, DIGITAL AND EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS STAFF
This year marks 25 years since FSIS issued its landmark final rule, “Pathogen Reduction/Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (PR/HACCP),” issued in the summer of 1996.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/news-events/news-press-releases/reflecting-25-years-haccp
Reflecting on 25 Years of HACCP
JACK CONNOLLY, DIGITAL AND EXECUTIVE COMMUNICATIONS STAFF
This year marks 25 years since FSIS issued its landmark final rule, “Pathogen Reduction/Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (PR/HACCP),” issued in the summer of 1996.
“Food safety is an ever-evolving process,” said FSIS Administrator Paul Kiecker, who began his Agency career as an inspector in a food processing establishment. “HACCP marked a dramatic change in food safety and how FSIS approached its mission of keeping food safe and role of inspecting processing establishments,” said Kiecker.
FDA Issues Warning Letter To Pet Food Company Associated with Over 100 Pet Deaths
FDA issued a corporate-wide Warning Letter for numerous issues identified during inspection. The "manufacturing plants revealed evidence of violations, which were shared across multiple plants and were associated with the illness or death of hundreds of pets who had eaten the company’s dry dog food. Samples of dog food were found to contain high levels of aflatoxin"
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-brief-fda-issues-corporate-wide-warning-letter-company-associated-contaminated-pet-food-hundreds
- Samples of SPORTMiX were later found to contain levels of aflatoxin as high as 558 parts per billion (ppb). The FDA considers pet food to be adulterated if it contains more than 20 ppb of aflatoxin.
- In March, Midwestern recalled several brands of pet food manufactured at its Monmouth, Illinois plant after samples tested positive for Salmonella. The FDA found that Midwestern’s food safety program appears inadequate to significantly minimize or prevent Salmonella in its pet food.
- After inspecting Midwestern’s Chickasha plant, the FDA also inspected the company’s three other manufacturing plants. These inspections revealed evidence of significant violations of the Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Food for Animals regulation
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-brief-fda-issues-corporate-wide-warning-letter-company-associated-contaminated-pet-food-hundreds
FDA In Brief: FDA Issues a Corporate-Wide Warning Letter to Company Associated with Contaminated Pet Food, Hundreds of Adverse Events
For Immediate Release:
August 17, 2021
The following quote is attributed to Steven M. Solomon, M.P.H., D.V.M., director of the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine
Monday, August 16, 2021
Buns Recalled After Co-Packer Has Posiive Environmental Samples
Hostess Brands, LLC (“Hostess Brands”) is voluntarily recalling certain Hostess® Soft White Hamburger Buns and Soft White Hot Dog Buns due to the potential for the products to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella. Hostess Brands is recalling the impacted products out of an abundance of caution after becoming aware of this issue from its co-manufacturer, Best Harvest Bakeries, through Best Harvest Bakeries’ environmental monitoring program.
Hard to tell what exactly transpired with this copacker and their environmental sampling program. Being that the recall was for both Salmonella and Listeria, one may think it was a rapid methodology that may give just a positive result? This is where it is important to understand the suppliers environmental sampling program...is it accurate with ample verification. Are third party audits digging deep enough into these testing programs?
Summary
Company Announcement Date: August 13, 2021
FDA Publish Date: August 16, 2021
Product Type: Food & Beverages
Reason for Announcement: Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella
Company Name: Hostess Brands, LLC
Brand Name: Hostess
Product Description: Hamburger and Hot Dog Buns
Tuna Salad Recalled After Mislabeling Results in Undeclared Allergen for Tuna
RMH Foods, LLC in Morton IL is voluntarily recalling 583 cases of Gordon Choice® Deli Style Tuna and Chicken Salads packed in 4lb rigid tubs because of undeclared wheat and tuna allergens. The recalled product contains tuna salad, but it has two labels. The bottom container states Deli Style Chicken Salad, while the top lid label states Deli Style Tuna Salad. The chicken salad labeling does not declare the wheat and Tuna allergens that are in the tuna salad. The product is in a white plastic 4lb tub.
The recall was initiated after discovering the incorrect bottom container had been used with the product. This error was confined to one specific product, and one specific lot. Five hundred and eighty-three (583) cases of the product were made. This recall is being made with the knowledge of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
The recall was initiated after discovering the incorrect bottom container had been used with the product. This error was confined to one specific product, and one specific lot. Five hundred and eighty-three (583) cases of the product were made. This recall is being made with the knowledge of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
This is a pretty simple error to prevent. An Allergen Preventive Control would include a regular check of both top and bottom labels. 583 cases at 4lbs per tub would certainly be a few hours to a whole shift of production where nobody was looking at these labels.
https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/rmh-foods-llc-issues-allergy-alert-undeclared-wheat-and-tuna-gordon-choicer-deli-style-tuna-and
RMH Foods, LLC Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Wheat and Tuna in Gordon Choice® Deli Style Tuna and Chicken Salads
Summary
Company Announcement Date: August 13, 2021
FDA Publish Date: August 16, 2021
Product Type: Food & Beverages
Reason for Announcement: Undeclared tuna and wheat
Company Name: RMH Foods, LLC
Brand Name: Gordon Choice
Product Description: Deli Style Tuna and Chicken Salads
https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/rmh-foods-llc-issues-allergy-alert-undeclared-wheat-and-tuna-gordon-choicer-deli-style-tuna-and
RMH Foods, LLC Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Wheat and Tuna in Gordon Choice® Deli Style Tuna and Chicken Salads
Summary
Company Announcement Date: August 13, 2021
FDA Publish Date: August 16, 2021
Product Type: Food & Beverages
Reason for Announcement: Undeclared tuna and wheat
Company Name: RMH Foods, LLC
Brand Name: Gordon Choice
Product Description: Deli Style Tuna and Chicken Salads
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)