Great American Marketing Company of Houston, Texas is recalling Ready to Eat Sandwiches, Wraps and Salads after FDA tested and found Listeria monocytogenes on the processing equipment. Recalls were released on both FDA and USDA websites since this was a dual jurisdiction facility.
These sandwiches appear to be sporting a shelf-life of at least 10 to 12 days based upon the date of recall to the last day that product was shipped. This would provide sufficient time for Listeria growth at refrigeration temperatures. (You wonder if people know they are buying / eating a 10 day old sandwich....perhaps the manufacturer is a great marketing company.)
Great American Marketing Company Recalls Ready To Eat Products Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
April 9, 2019
Sunday, April 14, 2019
Salmonella Outbreak Associated with Pre-cut Melons
CDC is investigating a Salmonella outbreak that has been linked to precut melons - watermelon, honeydew, and cantaloupe - produced by Cato Foods, LLC. To date, there have been 93 reported cases of Salmonella infection associated with this product.
Caito Foods recalled the fresh cut watermelon, fresh cut honeydew melon, fresh cut cantaloupe and fresh cut mixed fruit containing one of these melons, produced at the Caito Foods facility in Indianapolis. The products were packaged in clear, plastic clamshell containers and distributed in sixteen states including Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Caito Foods had a similar situation last summer where melon product was the source of Salmonella that caused 77 cases of illness. Facilities packing fresh cut melon product have to have tight controls on washing process. Facilities also have to work with suppliers.to ensure that bacterial pathogens are minimized through the use of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) and adhere to the FSMA Produce Rule In this case, the melons were imported, so these foreign suppliers must be working to meet US standards. With as much produce as this company is processing, based on extent of distribution, if melons coming in have sufficient contamination and the internal washing systems do not remove the contaminate, that contamination will be passed to the consumer.
FDA Recall Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm635948.htm
Caito Foods, LLC Voluntarily Recalls Fresh Cut Melon Product Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
April 12, 2019
Caito Foods recalled the fresh cut watermelon, fresh cut honeydew melon, fresh cut cantaloupe and fresh cut mixed fruit containing one of these melons, produced at the Caito Foods facility in Indianapolis. The products were packaged in clear, plastic clamshell containers and distributed in sixteen states including Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Caito Foods had a similar situation last summer where melon product was the source of Salmonella that caused 77 cases of illness. Facilities packing fresh cut melon product have to have tight controls on washing process. Facilities also have to work with suppliers.to ensure that bacterial pathogens are minimized through the use of Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) and adhere to the FSMA Produce Rule In this case, the melons were imported, so these foreign suppliers must be working to meet US standards. With as much produce as this company is processing, based on extent of distribution, if melons coming in have sufficient contamination and the internal washing systems do not remove the contaminate, that contamination will be passed to the consumer.
FDA Recall Notice
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm635948.htm
Caito Foods, LLC Voluntarily Recalls Fresh Cut Melon Product Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
April 12, 2019
CDC's Preliminary Investigation Links E. coli Outbreak to Ground Beef
CDC issued a preliminary investigative report that is linking ground beef to the ongoing E. coli outbreak. In this outbreak, there are now 109 cases with 17 hospitalizations. There have been no cases of HUS. The last linked illness case started on March 26, 2019
There were no specific supplier, retailer, or brand of ground beef identified at this point.
As we know, there are many out there who undercook ground beef or do not use a valid method to verify cooking (yeah, a thermometer).
CDC - Investigation Notice
https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2019/o103-04-19/index.html
Outbreak of E. coli O103
Illustration with a microscope and text reading Investigation Notice
Posted April 12, 2019 at 3:15 PM ET
There were no specific supplier, retailer, or brand of ground beef identified at this point.
As we know, there are many out there who undercook ground beef or do not use a valid method to verify cooking (yeah, a thermometer).
CDC - Investigation Notice
https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2019/o103-04-19/index.html
Outbreak of E. coli O103
Illustration with a microscope and text reading Investigation Notice
Posted April 12, 2019 at 3:15 PM ET
Friday, April 12, 2019
FDA Issues Final Rule on Antimicrobial Hand Sanitizers
FDA released a final rule on hand sanitizers for assurance of effectiveness and safety. Basically, they listed three benzalkonium chloride, ethyl alcohol (60 to 95 percent), and isopropyl alcohol (70 to 91.3 percent) that can be submitted for evaluation of safety and effectiveness data necessary "to make a determination regarding whether these active ingredients are generally recognized as safe and effective for use in OTC consumer antiseptic rub products." At this time, the FDA does not intend to take action to remove hand sanitizers containing these three active ingredients from the market - "less than 3% of the marketplace will be affected by the issuance of this final rule, as most OTC consumer antiseptic rubs use ethyl alcohol as the active ingredient."
"The following list includes those active ingredients addressed in the 1994 TFM for use in antiseptic hand washes or healthcare personnel hand washes and identified in the 2016 Consumer Antiseptic Rub proposed rule as having inadequate evidence of eligibility for evaluation under the OTC Drug Review for use in an OTC consumer antiseptic rub:
DA News Release
https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm635793.htm
FDA issues final rule on safety and effectiveness of consumer hand sanitizers
Action completes a series of actions on the FDA’s review of OTC antiseptic active ingredients
For Immediate Release
April 11, 2019
- Benzethonium chloride
- Chloroxylenol
- Chlorhexidine gluconate [2]
- Cloflucarban
- Fluorosalan
- Hexachlorophene
- Hexylresorcinol
- Iodine complex (ammonium ether sulfate and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate)
- Iodine complex (phosphate ester of alkylaryloxy polyethylene glycol)
- Methylbenzethonium chloride
- Nonylphenoxypoly (ethyleneoxy) ethanoliodine
- Phenol (equal to or less than 1.5 percent or greater than 1.5 percent)
- Poloxamer iodine complex
- Povidone-iodine 5 to 10 percent
- Secondary amyltricresols
- Sodium oxychlorosene
- Tribromsalan
- Triclocarban
- Triclosan
- Triple dye
- Undecoylium chloride iodine complex"
DA News Release
https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm635793.htm
FDA issues final rule on safety and effectiveness of consumer hand sanitizers
Action completes a series of actions on the FDA’s review of OTC antiseptic active ingredients
For Immediate Release
April 11, 2019
Tuesday, April 9, 2019
USDA Posts Guide to Food Product Date Coding
USDA posted a guide for food code dating. With a push to curb food waste, uniformity in how products are coded will help consumers.
The guide can be found here
(https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/19013cb7-8a4d-474c-8bd7-bda76b9defb3/Food-Product-Dating.pdf ) and is copied below.
A few key points:
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/19013cb7-8a4d-474c-8bd7-bda76b9defb3/Food-Product-Dating.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
Food Product Dating
"Best if Used By" is a type of date you might find on a meat, poultry, or egg product label. Are dates required on these food products? Does it mean the product will be unsafe to use after that date? Here is some background information answering these and other questions about product dating.
The guide can be found here
(https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/19013cb7-8a4d-474c-8bd7-bda76b9defb3/Food-Product-Dating.pdf ) and is copied below.
A few key points:
- Code dating is not required by federal regulations except for infant formula. (the USDA does require a "pack date" for poultry products and thermally processed, commercially sterile products to help identify product lots and facilitate trace-back activities in the event of an outbreak of foodborne illness)
- FSIS recommends that food manufacturers and retailers that apply product dating use a “Best if Used By” date
- Best By dates are based on quality not safety.
USDA FSIS
Food Product Dating
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/19013cb7-8a4d-474c-8bd7-bda76b9defb3/Food-Product-Dating.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
Food Product Dating
"Best if Used By" is a type of date you might find on a meat, poultry, or egg product label. Are dates required on these food products? Does it mean the product will be unsafe to use after that date? Here is some background information answering these and other questions about product dating.
Ground Beef Recalled After Two Complaints of Hard Plastic
JBS Plainwell, Inc., a Plainwell, Mich. establishment, is recalling approximately 43,292 pounds of ground beef products that may be contaminated with extraneous materials, specifically, pieces of hard plastic. The problem was discovered when the establishment received two complaints of green hard plastic in the ground beef products. FSIS was notified on April 5, 2019.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2019/recall-043-2019-release
JBS Plainwell, Inc. Recalls Ground Beef Products Due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class II
Recall 043-2019
Health Risk:Low
Apr 8, 2019
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2019/recall-043-2019-release
JBS Plainwell, Inc. Recalls Ground Beef Products Due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class II
Recall 043-2019
Health Risk:Low
Apr 8, 2019
Monday, April 8, 2019
Are Gluten-free Restaurant Foods Free of Gluten?
A study out of Columbia shows that gluten-free served in restaurants may contain traces of gluten. According to FDA regulations, for a food to be considered gluten-free, it must have less than 20ppm of gluten. "The research showed 32 percent of tests revealed detectable gluten in dishes that were supposed to be gluten-free."
Okay, but how reliable is this study? The results were uploaded by users (diners) onto a portable device that 'may' be capable of detecting gluten below the 20ppm level. "And most importantly, these results were voluntarily uploaded by users, who may be more likely to share results that show gluten contamination.”
So really, we don't know what the true percentage of restaurants that are in error of calling their food gluten-free, or if the food is technically gluten-free according to the regulation.
https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/study-measures-gluten-gluten-free-labeled-restaurant-food
Chronic Disease, Food Policy and Obesity Apr. 05 2019
Study Measures Gluten in Gluten-Free Labeled Restaurant Food
Okay, but how reliable is this study? The results were uploaded by users (diners) onto a portable device that 'may' be capable of detecting gluten below the 20ppm level. "And most importantly, these results were voluntarily uploaded by users, who may be more likely to share results that show gluten contamination.”
So really, we don't know what the true percentage of restaurants that are in error of calling their food gluten-free, or if the food is technically gluten-free according to the regulation.
https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/public-health-now/news/study-measures-gluten-gluten-free-labeled-restaurant-food
Chronic Disease, Food Policy and Obesity Apr. 05 2019
Study Measures Gluten in Gluten-Free Labeled Restaurant Food
USDA FSIS Calls Out Washington Post on Misleading Article on Pork Processing
On the USDA webpage, USDA FSIS posted a rebuttal to an article published in the Washington Post on April 3rd titled" Pork industry soon will have more power over meat inspections".
The main stream media loves to spin new initiatives to make it seem like the government and industry seem like they are in cahoots to make the food supply less safe. But the reality is that our pork supply is safer and Salmonella, while a concern in all raw meats, has not been involved in major outbreaks. It was good to see that USDA responded to this article to provide balance.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/newsroom/news-releases-statements-transcripts/news-release-archives-by-year/archive/2019/nr-040819-01
USDA’s FSIS Condemns The Washington Post for False Reporting on a Critical Public Health Issue
April 8, 2019
The main stream media loves to spin new initiatives to make it seem like the government and industry seem like they are in cahoots to make the food supply less safe. But the reality is that our pork supply is safer and Salmonella, while a concern in all raw meats, has not been involved in major outbreaks. It was good to see that USDA responded to this article to provide balance.
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/newsroom/news-releases-statements-transcripts/news-release-archives-by-year/archive/2019/nr-040819-01
USDA’s FSIS Condemns The Washington Post for False Reporting on a Critical Public Health Issue
April 8, 2019
Study Determines via WGS that Product Contamination Issue Actually a Laboratory Cross Contamination Issue
A study in the International Journal of Food microbiology shows that a 2013 Salmonella contamination case, where Salmonella was found in finished chocolate, was determined to be a laboratory cross contamination issue. Using whole genome sequencing (WGS), researchers matched the product contaminate with an organism from the laboratory.
WGS of contamination cases should become standard practice for commercial laboratories where their findings of a positive sample will result in large value recalls. Laboratories should have their positive control strains tested as other positive samples recently found. Additionally, commercial laboratories should already have an aggressive environmental monitoring program.
International Journal of Food Microbiology
International Journal of Food Microbiology
Volume 298, 2 June 2019, Pages 39-43
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160518307785
Whole genome sequencing used in an industrial context reveals a Salmonella laboratory cross-contamination
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168160518307785
Whole genome sequencing used in an industrial context reveals a Salmonella laboratory cross-contamination
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)