Beef Ravioli Labeled as Chicken with Rice Conagra Brands, Inc., a Milton, Pa. establishment, is recalling approximately 2,871 pounds of chicken and rice products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens - the products may contain milk and wheat, known allergens, which are not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered by the firm after receiving consumer complaints that bowls of microwave beef ravioli were mislabeled as “chicken with rice & vegetables.”
https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2019/recall-025-2019-release
Conagra Brands, Inc. Recalls Chicken and Rice Products Due To Misbranding and Undeclared Allergens
Class I Recall
025-2019
Health Risk:High
Mar 9, 2019
Monday, March 11, 2019
Grocery Stores Report Recall of Flour Due to Potential Salmonella Contamination
According to news reports, two grocery chains are recalling Pillsbury flour in 5lb bags for potential Salmonella contamination. The chains, Publix and Winn Dixie are both in the Southeast US.
FDA has not yet posted a recall on their website, so there is limited information.
Salmonella can be found in flour and becomes an issue when items are undercooked or not cooked (like raw cookie dough) or there is cross contamination in the kitchen when the contaminated flour gets onto ready-to-eat food items.
http://www.fox13news.com/consumer/publix-winn-dixie-recalls-pillsbury-flour-due-to-salmonella-concern
Publix, Winn-Dixie recalls Pillsbury flour due to salmonella concern
By FOX 13 News staff
Posted Mar 11 2019 05:56AM EDT
Updated Mar 11 2019 07:16AM EDT
FDA has not yet posted a recall on their website, so there is limited information.
Salmonella can be found in flour and becomes an issue when items are undercooked or not cooked (like raw cookie dough) or there is cross contamination in the kitchen when the contaminated flour gets onto ready-to-eat food items.
http://www.fox13news.com/consumer/publix-winn-dixie-recalls-pillsbury-flour-due-to-salmonella-concern
Publix, Winn-Dixie recalls Pillsbury flour due to salmonella concern
By FOX 13 News staff
Posted Mar 11 2019 05:56AM EDT
Updated Mar 11 2019 07:16AM EDT
Saturday, March 9, 2019
One Lot of Organic Bean Sprouts Recalled for Listeria
A Florida establishment is voluntarily recalling Organic Bean Sprouts because it has the potential to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes, This recall was issued after the Florida Department of Agriculture pulled a sample from a store shelf and found Listeria (we assume). Product was shipped to Whole Foods Markets in Florida and Freedom Fresh (a Miami distributor) on February 18, 2019 and had a sell by date of February 28, 2019, so unlikely to be in Marketplace.
Like many other recalls involving Listeria where only the tested positive lot is recalled, these recalls are often expanded as it is discovered that the facility did not have adequate controls in place. For ensuring public health, recalls of these natures should initially begin with a broad recall unless the company can show that they have had adequate controls in place. Hard to say in this case, unless over this recall is expanded over the next week.
Fullei Fresh Recalls Organic Bean Sprouts Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
March 8, 2019
Like many other recalls involving Listeria where only the tested positive lot is recalled, these recalls are often expanded as it is discovered that the facility did not have adequate controls in place. For ensuring public health, recalls of these natures should initially begin with a broad recall unless the company can show that they have had adequate controls in place. Hard to say in this case, unless over this recall is expanded over the next week.
Fullei Fresh Recalls Organic Bean Sprouts Because of Possible Health Risk
For Immediate Release
March 8, 2019
Thursday, March 7, 2019
FDA Release Guidance on Food Defense - Mitigation Strategies to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration
The FDA published a draft guidance for food defense titled Mitigation Strategies to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration: Guidance for Industry in support of the Prevention of Intentional Adulteration rule. The draft guidance provides ways to meet the requirements in the rule specifically conducting the vulnerability assessment and putting mitigation strategies in place for ‘actionable process steps’ or APS. These APS are defined as “a point, step, or procedure in a food process where a significant vulnerability exists and at which mitigation strategies can be applied and are essential to significantly minimize or prevent the significant vulnerability”.
To summarize the 159 page document - a Food Defense Plan is essentially conducting a HACCP type of analysis where the goal is to find steps in the process where significant vulnerability exists and to put in measures, or the mitigation strategies’ to reduce the vulnerabilities. These vulnerable points are points where there is access to product where the product can then be contaminated.
There is flexibility in how one conducts a vulnerability assessment, but the guidance provides some basic ways. The elements that must be considered include 1) the potential public health impact (e.g., severity and scale) if a contaminant were added, 2) the degree of physical access to the product; and 3) the ability of an attacker to successfully contaminate the product. The analysis must consider an attack by an insider, a person working in the company. The written assessment must document why each step was considered, or not considered, an APS.
For steps designated as an APS, mitigation strategies are put in place. These strategies may limit access to the step, or may reduce the likelihood that someone can contaminate product at that step. Like critical controls points, each mitigation strategy must have monitoring, verification, and corrective action.
While many may ask about facility wide measures – items such as exterior fencing, employee access to the facility and such – these are not included within the plan unless they can be tailored to impact a specific Actionable Process Step. Sure, they are important, but many have these in place already for other purposes and in reality, they are harder for regulators to regulate.
To summarize the 159 page document - a Food Defense Plan is essentially conducting a HACCP type of analysis where the goal is to find steps in the process where significant vulnerability exists and to put in measures, or the mitigation strategies’ to reduce the vulnerabilities. These vulnerable points are points where there is access to product where the product can then be contaminated.
There is flexibility in how one conducts a vulnerability assessment, but the guidance provides some basic ways. The elements that must be considered include 1) the potential public health impact (e.g., severity and scale) if a contaminant were added, 2) the degree of physical access to the product; and 3) the ability of an attacker to successfully contaminate the product. The analysis must consider an attack by an insider, a person working in the company. The written assessment must document why each step was considered, or not considered, an APS.
For steps designated as an APS, mitigation strategies are put in place. These strategies may limit access to the step, or may reduce the likelihood that someone can contaminate product at that step. Like critical controls points, each mitigation strategy must have monitoring, verification, and corrective action.
While many may ask about facility wide measures – items such as exterior fencing, employee access to the facility and such – these are not included within the plan unless they can be tailored to impact a specific Actionable Process Step. Sure, they are important, but many have these in place already for other purposes and in reality, they are harder for regulators to regulate.
Tuesday, March 5, 2019
USDA Issuing Guidelines to Increase Attention to Foreign Material Complaints
Over the past few years, food companies, specifically meat and poultry processors, have issued a large number of recalls related to foreign objects. Now USDA is issuing guidelines for food companies to respond more aggressively with foreign material complaints. The USDA wants "food makers to start internal investigations when they receive customer complaints and to notify the government within 24 hours if contaminated products are in the marketplace".
Are foreign material issues an increasing issue? I would argue that it is not. Certainly the visibility of these issues is new. Within the past few years, the Reportable Food Registry and Consumer Complaint portals were introduced and the use has increased. So while in the past, consumer complaints for foreign materials were received by companies and handled internally without much federal intervention. Recalls were issued for serious foreign material issues. What has changed isn't as much there are more foreign material issues, but USDA is paying close attention. And much of this started as consumers were able to complain directly to USDA, and with that, inspectors began paying more attention to foreign material issues. As issues were seen within the complaint records, more recalls were issued.
Is a more aggressive response prudent? Not being involved directly in these investigations, it is difficult to know exactly. From the recall notices, it appears that many recalls are issued after one complaint. But what did the investigation show? It is important that complaints are well investigated before wasting resources on a recall. I have seen where complaints were made by consumers in order to get a replacement product (free product). There were other cases where the consumer improperly cut the package with a part of that package unknowingly falling into the product only to be viewed by the consumer as a foreign object. People have assumed the food was a source of a foreign object when that food was used in a recipe.
Perhaps some of us come from a different era that when we found a piece of plastic in a food item, we accepted that as 'something that can happen', and threw the piece of plastic out. Not saying that is right and that food companies should do a better job, but if no injury than no foul.
We are already seeing people pay less heed to recalls. As we add more and more recalls to the weekly list, it is bound to increase the consumer ambivalence. So at the very least, time should be allowed for an investigation and companies should be allowed input on the determination of whether the recall is necessitated. In the end, they will pay for the real issues.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/new-food-safety-guidelines-expected-after-spike-meat-poultry-recalls-n979161
New food safety guidelines expected after spike in meat and poultry recalls
More food prepared by machines contributes to more parts breaking off and contaminating food, consumer advocates say.
March 4, 2019, 5:53 PM EST
By Reuters
Are foreign material issues an increasing issue? I would argue that it is not. Certainly the visibility of these issues is new. Within the past few years, the Reportable Food Registry and Consumer Complaint portals were introduced and the use has increased. So while in the past, consumer complaints for foreign materials were received by companies and handled internally without much federal intervention. Recalls were issued for serious foreign material issues. What has changed isn't as much there are more foreign material issues, but USDA is paying close attention. And much of this started as consumers were able to complain directly to USDA, and with that, inspectors began paying more attention to foreign material issues. As issues were seen within the complaint records, more recalls were issued.
Is a more aggressive response prudent? Not being involved directly in these investigations, it is difficult to know exactly. From the recall notices, it appears that many recalls are issued after one complaint. But what did the investigation show? It is important that complaints are well investigated before wasting resources on a recall. I have seen where complaints were made by consumers in order to get a replacement product (free product). There were other cases where the consumer improperly cut the package with a part of that package unknowingly falling into the product only to be viewed by the consumer as a foreign object. People have assumed the food was a source of a foreign object when that food was used in a recipe.
Perhaps some of us come from a different era that when we found a piece of plastic in a food item, we accepted that as 'something that can happen', and threw the piece of plastic out. Not saying that is right and that food companies should do a better job, but if no injury than no foul.
We are already seeing people pay less heed to recalls. As we add more and more recalls to the weekly list, it is bound to increase the consumer ambivalence. So at the very least, time should be allowed for an investigation and companies should be allowed input on the determination of whether the recall is necessitated. In the end, they will pay for the real issues.
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/new-food-safety-guidelines-expected-after-spike-meat-poultry-recalls-n979161
New food safety guidelines expected after spike in meat and poultry recalls
More food prepared by machines contributes to more parts breaking off and contaminating food, consumer advocates say.
March 4, 2019, 5:53 PM EST
By Reuters
Washington State Firm Recalls Ground Beef Chubs After Complaint of Hard Plastic
WASHINGTON, March 2, 2019 – Washington Beef, LLC, a Toppenish, Wash. establishment, is recalling approximately 30,260 pounds of ground beef chubs products that may be contaminated with extraneous materials, specifically hard plastic and metal. The problem was discovered by a consumer complaint to the company on February 28, 2019. There have been no confirmed reports of adverse reactions due to consumption of these products.
https://origin-www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2019/recall-024-2019-release
Washington Beef, LLC Recalls Ground Beef Products due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class I Recall
024-2019
Health Risk:High
Mar 2, 2019
https://origin-www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/recalls-and-public-health-alerts/recall-case-archive/archive/2019/recall-024-2019-release
Washington Beef, LLC Recalls Ground Beef Products due to Possible Foreign Matter Contamination
Class I Recall
024-2019
Health Risk:High
Mar 2, 2019
Thursday, February 28, 2019
Salmonella Outbreak Associated with Tahini Appears to Be Over
As of February 27, 2019, FDA and CDC are saying that the multistate outbreak of Salmonella Concord illnesses linked to tahini imported from an Israeli manufacturer, Achdut Ltd., located in Ari’el, Israel appears to be over. In all, there were 8 cases of salmonellosis.
February 8 Update
https://pennstatefoodsafety.blogspot.com/2019/02/fda-investigating-multistate-salmonella.html
FDA Investigated a Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Concord Linked to Tahini Produced by Achdut Ltd.
Update: February 27, 2019
Case Counts
Total Illnesses: 8
Hospitalizations: 0
Deaths: 0
Last illness onset: April 21, 2018 to January 3, 2019
States with Cases: HI (1), MA (1), MI (1), NY (5)
February 8 Update
https://pennstatefoodsafety.blogspot.com/2019/02/fda-investigating-multistate-salmonella.html
FDA Investigated a Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Concord Linked to Tahini Produced by Achdut Ltd.
Update: February 27, 2019
Case Counts
Total Illnesses: 8
Hospitalizations: 0
Deaths: 0
Last illness onset: April 21, 2018 to January 3, 2019
States with Cases: HI (1), MA (1), MI (1), NY (5)
This Week in Mislabeled Products for Week Ending March 2, 2019
Sulfites Missing from Label - Joy Gourmet Foods Inc. of Maspeth, NY is recalling its Joy Brand Chutneys and Pastes products because they contain undeclared sulfites. The recall was initiated after a routine inspection by a United States of America Food and Drug Administration(FDA) Food Inspector, which revealed that the sulfites containing product was distributed in packages that did not declare their presence. [Label design issue - failure to recognize sulfites, used to protect against fruit oxidation/discoloration, need to be on the label...may have been using more a processing aid).
Ingredients Listed for Wrong Salad Dressing - Russ Davis Wholesale – Crazy-Fresh, an Eagan, Minn. establishment, is recalling approximately 702 pounds of chicken Caesar salad products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens, the product contains milk and anchovies, known allergens, which are not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered on February 24, 2019, when FSIS was notified that the establishment discovered the misbranding of product while performing a label review. [Clearly a design issue...this one gets chalked up as a marketing department error or the nutritionist]
Cashews in Marinara Sauce - B&G Foods announced today it is voluntarily recalling 1,280 cases of a single date code of 40 oz. Victoria Marinara Sauce, with a “best by” date of 03/06/2022, after learning that the product may contain cashew allergens that are not declared on the product’s ingredient statement. B&G Foods discovered this issue when it received one consumer complaint alleging a cashew allergic reaction. B&G Foods initiated the recall of this product based on the results of its investigation and testing that indicated the possible presence of cashew allergens in up to 1,280 cases of this product with this particular “best by” date. [Looks to be an improper line clean-out]
Ingredients Listed for Wrong Salad Dressing - Russ Davis Wholesale – Crazy-Fresh, an Eagan, Minn. establishment, is recalling approximately 702 pounds of chicken Caesar salad products due to misbranding and undeclared allergens, the product contains milk and anchovies, known allergens, which are not declared on the product label. The problem was discovered on February 24, 2019, when FSIS was notified that the establishment discovered the misbranding of product while performing a label review. [Clearly a design issue...this one gets chalked up as a marketing department error or the nutritionist]
Cashews in Marinara Sauce - B&G Foods announced today it is voluntarily recalling 1,280 cases of a single date code of 40 oz. Victoria Marinara Sauce, with a “best by” date of 03/06/2022, after learning that the product may contain cashew allergens that are not declared on the product’s ingredient statement. B&G Foods discovered this issue when it received one consumer complaint alleging a cashew allergic reaction. B&G Foods initiated the recall of this product based on the results of its investigation and testing that indicated the possible presence of cashew allergens in up to 1,280 cases of this product with this particular “best by” date. [Looks to be an improper line clean-out]
Wrong Bag for Pretzels - Utz Quality Foods, LLC., is voluntarily recalling a specific expiration date code of Bachman® 10 oz Twist Pretzel packages due to undeclared milk. This recall was initiated after reviewing production records which identified a small number of packages were mislabeled.
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm632223.htm
Joy Gourmet Foods LLC Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Sulfites
For Immediate Release
February 27, 2019
https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm632223.htm
Joy Gourmet Foods LLC Issues Allergy Alert on Undeclared Sulfites
For Immediate Release
February 27, 2019
Wednesday, February 27, 2019
FDA Issues Warning Letters to Two Egg Facilities - NY and AL
FDA issued Warning Letters to two different egg production facilities with a focus on inadequate controls for Salmonella enteriditis. For one of the facilities, the investigation came after a Salmonella outbreak.
Our handling and cooking of eggs has become dependent on egg farmers controlling Salmonella in their flocks. We generally eat eggs with minimal cooking (over easy, poached, or we go Rocky), but there is a risk. For facilities with good controls in place, the Salmonella risk is minimal, but for those farms that don't have good controls, Salmonella can be present in the eggs.
Gravel Ridge Farms, Alabama - Because of a Salmonella outbreak associated with eggs in September, FDA conducted an inspection of egg facility in Alabama. The issues were:
Our handling and cooking of eggs has become dependent on egg farmers controlling Salmonella in their flocks. We generally eat eggs with minimal cooking (over easy, poached, or we go Rocky), but there is a risk. For facilities with good controls in place, the Salmonella risk is minimal, but for those farms that don't have good controls, Salmonella can be present in the eggs.
Gravel Ridge Farms, Alabama - Because of a Salmonella outbreak associated with eggs in September, FDA conducted an inspection of egg facility in Alabama. The issues were:
- There was not control program for Salmonella Enteritidis (SE).
- Inadequate cleaning to prevent cross contamination.
- There were no biosecurity measures in place
- There was no pest control program
- They did not clean the facility to remove pest harborage sites.
In the Notice it was noted that the facility was shut down by owners with no plans on reopening.
FDA issued a warning letter to Pitcher Road Farm of Ovid, NY, 14521 after an inspection that took place from August 1 through August 2, 2018. The farm had failed to implement thier SE plan including not testing the environment for SE or implementing measures for preventing cross contamination.
Cincinnati District Office
6751 Steger Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45237
Telephone: (513) 679-2700
FAX: (513) 679-2772
February 12, 2019
WARNING LETTER 566836
FDA issued a warning letter to Pitcher Road Farm of Ovid, NY, 14521 after an inspection that took place from August 1 through August 2, 2018. The farm had failed to implement thier SE plan including not testing the environment for SE or implementing measures for preventing cross contamination.
Cincinnati District Office
6751 Steger Drive
Cincinnati, OH 45237
Telephone: (513) 679-2700
FAX: (513) 679-2772
February 12, 2019
WARNING LETTER 566836
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)