Florida Supermarket Closes Operations as State Finds Listeria Throughout Operation

A Florida grocery store closed its business after a reinspection by the State of Florida found Listeria throughout the operation.

"Samples collected on Sept. 9 found evidence of listeria bacteria on various surfaces around the store, leading inspectors to issue 15 stop-sale and stop-use orders. Inspectors last tested food samples from the Margate store on Aug. 6. Six samples were collected and no listeria was found. No illnesses have been reported."

Before it shut down, the store tried to sell of its product at fire sale prices.  Unfortunately, this included product that may have been subject to Listeria contamination.  This caused the State to issue an order to cease all operations.  Some of this product came from quarantined area.

It is a rare occurrence where a retail store is shut down by the State due to Listeria positive samples...it is also rare that a state department monitors Listeria in a retail operation to begin with.  In this case, the initial sampling occurred in the first quarter of the year with Listeria being found.  The retail established dumped product and resumed operations.  In September, the store was respected and Listeria was found again.  Easy to guess that if the State had sampled a month after the initial sampling, they would have found it.

South Florida Sun Sentinel
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/fl-bz-penn-dutch-immediate-shut-down-20190919-itojdrhlpndtni7xs2366k2bwi-story.html
State shuts down Penn Dutch in Margate for ‘endangering public health’ over listeria
By Doreen Christensen
South Florida Sun Sentinel |
Sep 19, 2019 | 8:22 PM

Results of Sampling Retail Foods for Listeria

USDA led a multiyear study to look at Listeria in foods at retail.

• Six broad groups were tested - seafood, produce, dairy, meat, eggs, and combination foods) 
• Samples were collected weekly at large national chain supermarkets and independent grocery stores between December 2010 and March 2013.
• 27,389 total samples were taken with 
• 116 samples tested positive by the BAX PCR system for L. monocytogenes, and the pathogen was isolated and confirmed for 102 samples (0.3%)
• 571 samples that tested positive for Listeria-like organisms

A few takeaways

• Screening samples used a 25 gram sample. If a larger sample size was used, would the percent positive be higher?
• Sampling ended over 4 years ago.  If sampling and testing were conduced today, would we expect lower numbers?
• Cut raw vegetables were the highest at 1%., but the scariest is the pre-made salads - seafood salad and deli-type salads (and pre-made sandwiches) since those would be consumed without any preparation and the numbers/gram were generally lower.
• While the percentage of cheese samples that were positive are low, there where some high numbers on those that tested positive.

Journal of Food Protection
http://jfoodprotection.org/doi/abs/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-420?code=fopr-site
Survey for Listeria monocytogenes in and on Ready-to-Eat Foods from Retail Establishments in the United States (2010 through 2013): Assessing Potential Changes of Pathogen Prevalence and Levels in a Decade
John B. Luchansky,1 Yuhuan Chen,2* Anna C. S. Porto-Fett,1 Régis Pouillot,2 Bradley A. Shoyer,1 Rachel Johnson-DeRycke,3† Denise R. Eblen,3† Karin Hoelzer,2‡ William K. Shaw Jr.,3 Jane M. van Doren,2 Michelle Catlin,3 Jeehyun Lee,4§ Rohan Tikekar,4§ Daniel Gallagher,5 James A. Lindsay,1 The Listeria Market Basket Survey Multi-Institutional Team,‖ and Sherri Dennis2

Target Store Pulls Hampton Creek Food Products

Target stores removed Hampton Creek products from their stores.  These products are under the 'Just' brand and include Just Mayo, Just Mustard, and Just Chocolate Chip.  There is no official word yet on the actions were taken, but will stop selling the products ' pending a full review.'

Bloomberg News
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-22/target-begins-removing-hampton-creek-s-products-from-stores
Target Begins Removing Hampton Creek's Products From Stores
By Olivia Zaleski
‎June‎ ‎22‎, ‎2017‎ ‎5‎:‎24‎ ‎PM Updated on ‎June‎ ‎22‎, ‎2017‎ ‎9‎:‎24‎ ‎PM

 - Target received information alleging possible health concerns
 - The allegations included claims about mislabeled products

Enforcement of Rule for Ground Meat Logs Starts Oct. 1

 On October 1, USDA FSIS will begin enforcement of the rule requiring establishments and retail stores that grind raw beef for sale in commerce to maintain a log of the lot information on which raw materials were used to produce that ground meat.  Specifically:

1. The establishment numbers of the establishments supplying the materials used to prepare each lot of raw ground beef product; 
2. All supplier lot numbers and production dates; 
3. The names of the supplied materials, including beef components and any materials carried over from one production lot to the next; 
4. The date and time each lot of raw ground beef product is produced, and 
5. The date and time when grinding equipment and other related food-contact surfaces are cleaned and sanitized. 

  

FSIS Notice

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/931c84b3-cc2e-4a10-9108-806bfab661b0/75-16.pdf?MOD=AJPERES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC FSIS NOTICE 75-16 9/28/16 

NOTE: DO NOT IMPLEMENT THIS NOTICE UNTIL OCTOBER 1, 2016. 

The Rise of the Grocerant and Addressing Food Safety Issues

An article in the Wall Street Journal addresses the food safety issues for grocers that are moving into more sophisticated prepared meals to-go.  These hybrid operations, dubbed 'grocerants' by some, are both grocery store and restaurant.  As consumers demand more of these fresh ready-to-eat or ready-to-heat offerings, store operations will  have to address the food safety challenges that comes with these types of processes.

According to the graphic in the article, sushi and soups are currently the type two types of foods.  But there is an increase in operations making more complex meals.
Here are some of the challenges:

Supermarket's Communication on Food Recalls Varies

A report published by CSPI shows that supermarket chain procedures for handling recall communications varies from chain to chain.  By regulation, stores are supposed to post information in a conspicuous spot for 14 days after the recall.  Not everyone is doing it the way they are supposed to be doing it according to this report.

Center for Science in the Public Interest
https://cspinet.org/news/supermarkets-do-uneven-job-notifying-consumers-recalls-20160824#.V72z-5n5eqs.twitter
Supermarkets Do Uneven Job Notifying Consumers of Recalls

What Wine Do You Serve with Roasted Raccoon?

A California grocery store was selling frozen raccoon, fur on, until they were visited by the LA Health Department.  A customer had spotted the frozen furry critter with tongue hanging out, and reported it.  The supermarket is said to have been selling frozen raccoons for years.

At 9.99/lb, a five pound raccoon, field dressed and frozen, will probably yield about  2lbs or so of meat.  In the end, pretty expensive, unless of course, you can 'fix' yourself a coon tail hat.

Is it legal?  Game animals have to be farm raised and slaughtered under inspection to be sold commercially.

So what type of wine would you serve....well, you came to the spot.  Denise Gardner, Wine Extension Extraordinaire, suggests a nice Beaujolais, a light bodied red with a fair amount of acidity.  This will pair nicely to the gaminess of the cooked varmint.  Not the nouveau style of the wine however.


CBS Los Angeles
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2015/02/10/la-health-department-takes-action-after-local-supermarket-sells-raccoons-as-food/
LA Health Officials Take Action After Local Supermarket Sells Raccoons As Food
February 10, 2015 11:11 PM

TEMPLE CITY (CBSLA.com) — The Health Department has taken action after a local supermarket’s frozen foods section featured an unusual item.

Inspectors from the LA County Health Department visited the Metro Supermarket in Temple City on Tuesday, after being informed that the market was selling raccoons as food.

Mining Tweets for Targeting Restaurant Inspections

A number of cities have begun analyzing Twitter or other web-based public review/grading systems such as Yelp as a way to target restaurant inspections.  Basically, they have computer systems which search through tweets and/or reviews looking for specific indicators, collect the data and spit out restaurant names that meet the criteria warranting inspection.

 In the Chicago initiative, using data from March 23, 2013 and November 10, 2014, they flagged 3,594 tweets as potential food poisoning cases. Of these tweets, they determined 419, roughly 12 percent, as likely cases.   While not clearly stated if it is in the same time frame, they conducted 133 inspections and found that 40% of them had serious violations, or 53 establishments.
I guess I am supposed to think this is cool, but it just seems so backwards.  Using resources to scour through people's comments that they post in a few seconds, it just seems a bit, passive. And knowing that foodborne illness can occur in any length of time, from minutes to days after eating a food, what is the chance that someone is going to know which food made them sick.  Also considering that the occasional belly ache is often attributed to some food they ate, and that rarely does one attribute the illness to food they made at home, will inspectors be chasing after establishments that don't deserve to be scrutinized. Clearly, 60% of those inspected did not have significant issues.

Using those same resources, and having a designated line for complaints, would they have not found those 53 establishments, or even better, using those resources to fix issues in establishments before those issues led to someone becoming ill.  

The financial costs of establishing and maintaining these systems were not provided in the HPR piece attached here, so it is hard to say if they are getting bang for the buck. If the cost is minimal, then it is no big deal, especially if they are using this to augment their current inspection system.   But I am inclined to think that more of a direct approach to ensuring safety...regular on site inspections and requirements for establishments to have trained manager/employees. 



Harvard Political Review
http://harvardpolitics.com/united-states/food-safety-numbers/
Food Safety in Numbers
By Advik Shreekumar

On March 23, 2013, the civic organization Smart Chicago launched an ambitious program to enhance the city’s food safety efforts: Foodborne Chicago. Using a mix of statistical techniques and computer science, Foodborne searches Twitter for complaints of food poisoning, then follows up with users and generates formal investigations. Chicago is not alone in these efforts; San Francisco, Boston, and New York City are all in the process of implementing similar initiatives to better enforce their health codes.

Foodborne Chicago and its sibling programs are bold attempts to modernize governance, harnessing the massive streams of information on social media sites. However, while these initiatives have the potential to dramatically improve public health, they also grant additional power to the companies holding the data. This, in turn, will challenge traditional notions of privacy and property.

Reaching Consumers with Product Safety Information - A Challenge for FSMA Regulation

On March 26th, FDA issued advanced notice of their proposed Implementation of the Food and Drug Administration Food Safety Modernization Act Amendments to the Reportable Food Registry Provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act(link). In summary, FDA is looking for a way to communicate food safety product notices (recalls) to consumers. The objectives are for companies to provide standardized information to FDA, FDA to develop a one-page recall notice regarding that food safety issue with a reportable food, and then that notice will then be distributed by the retail outlets, or grocery chains, to the consumers.

 

Sounds easy enough, however, there are many challenges in establishing a protocol that will work. Chiefly among them is the fact that consumers are not an easy group to reach with recall this type of information. So how do retailers do this to a point where it is not costly? And from a practical standpoint, will this mandated system have an impact compared to what currently happens today?

 

This has implications for the manufacturers, but more so for the grocery chains.

 

Here is a ‘quick’ summary, much taken directly from the seven page document published in the Federal Register.

Risk Assessment of Listeria in Retail Delicantessens

FDA released the Draft Interagency Risk Assessment – Listeria monocytogenes in Retail Delicatessens Technical Report. (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/FoodScienceResearch/RiskSafetyAssessment/UCM351328.pdf). The goal of this report is to further the understanding of the risk of Listeria monocytogenes that is associated with the retail deli case. Listeria monocytogenes can grow on meat and cheese items that are sold in retail deli establishments. As we know, Listeria can grow at refrigeration temperatures and deli meat products have been involved in past outbreak. Therefore it is important for retail establishments to understand how to best limit the risk of Listeria in their retail cases where there are products with exposure during handling and storage, such as cut luncheon meats.

FDA and USDA evaluated various practices in retail deli operations and came up with some best practices to mitigate the risk of Listeria.

While this is a beast of a report at 179 pages, there are some good takeaways. Here some of the highlights, in more common language. Below this, the conclusion from the report and the USDA news release are also included.

1. Start with products that have minimal Listeria risk. While selling products that have anti-Listeria agents helps, this is not always possible. But procuring items that have been produced in establishments with good Listeria control programs is important. It is also important to properly handle those products are handled from the time they are made through the time they are brought into the retail deli establishment. Even small amounts of Listeria introduced can have a huge impact over time.
2. Keep deli retail case temperatures low, certainly below 41 degree F. While Listeria can grow at refrigeration temperatures, it does grow slowly. So the lower below the temperature of 41F, the better.
3. Clean and sanitize the retail deli units regularly, especially the niches within the cooler….like the drain.
4. Prevent cross contamination from other sources. Clean the slicers and the utensils regularly. Ensure that employees are washing hands and wearing gloves.
5. Remember that items that do not allow the growth of Listeria can be sources of contamination. For example, most fresh produce items which does not support the growth of Listeria can still be the source of contamination for meat items that will support growth. So put controls in place for handling and storage of those types of items.
6. If pre-slicing, pre-slice on a clean slicer. ( I am not a fan of pre-slice meat, I prefer sliced to order).

 

Conclusions from the report.

 

This QRA represents the first large-scale effort to model L. monocytogenes cross contamination at retail. The risk assessment model contributes to our understanding of L. monocytogenes transmission, survival, and growth in the retail environment and was used to evaluate how retail practices may impact the predicted risk of listeriosis. The approach used was to evaluate the public health effect of various mitigations under six different baseline conditions that may characterize a retail deli and the RTE food its serves.

Fear the Grocery Carts?

Here is a study just released in Food Protection Trends. The study shows that grocery carts are a bit unsanitary as indicated by the presence of bacterial indicators (APC, coliforms, generic E. coli). While the study is a bit soft in the methodology (should have actually checked for pathogens, should have used better methods for testing), it does show that shopping carts are not the cleanest things in the world, and there is the possibility that carts can be a source of contamination, primarily children riding in those carts (putting their fingers on the cart seat and then sticking those same fingers in their mouth).  

But before we all go crazy worrying about grocery carts, it is important to point out this is just one of many risks that we all face each day. How about that grass where the kid is crawling….might that be a place where birds, dogs, or cats may have pooped? The refrigerator where juices from raw meats may have dripped…did it get on the apples?. That grocery store conveyor, where the packs of raw meat may have dripped…could those drops contaminated your other food packages?. How about those reusable grocery bags that never get washed after being used to carry raw meat? Where did you put your hands while eating lunch on a park bench where earlier, a group of the pigeons deposited their load as they flew by? Certainly it is important that we take precautionary measures such as washing our hands, cooking our food, and washing our grocery bags, but for each study that comes out that demonstrating the somewhat obvious, we cannot let the potential of contacting a contaminated surface become the bane of our lives. As they say, the key to a healthy immune system is a constant challenge.


Bacterial Contamination of Shopping Carts and Approaches to Control

Charles P. Gerba* and Sheri Maxwell
Dept. of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Food Protection Trends, Vol. 32, No. 12, Pages 747–749

Summary

Placing children in grocery shopping carts has been implicated recently as a source of infection with Salmonella and Campylobacter in young children. This study was conducted to assess the occurrence total bacteria, coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli on grocery shopping cart handles and seats. A total of 85 shopping carts in parking lots of grocery stores were tested in five major metropolitan areas across the United States. The total numbers of heterotrophic bacteria were as great as 1.1 × 107 on the handle and seat. Coliforms were detected on 72% (62) of the carts. E. coli was identified on 18 of 35 carts (51%) on which coliform identifi­cation was conducted. The results of this study suggest the need for improved sanitation of shopping cards/baskets to reduce exposure to pathogens and potential transmission of microbial infections among shoppers.